Bird flu hoax alert: US Animal & Plant Health Inspection Service fails official evidence challenge
another FOIA failure, consistent with the pseudoscientific literature
Greetings and Best Wishes,
My July 21, 2024 FOIA order filed with the U.S. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Department of Agriculture finally came to completion in March of this year. It resulted in a grand total of zero responsive records being provided or cited by the “experts” there.
My order was for:
All studies in the possession/custody/control of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Department of Agriculture, authored by anyone, anywhere:
1. - that scientifically prove/provide evidence of the existence of any alleged "avian influenza virus" (showing that the alleged particles exist, invade and replicate in "host" cells and cause the illness/symptoms that they are alleged to cause), or
2. - that (at least) describe the purification of particles that are alleged to be "avian influenza virus" directly from bodily fluid/tissue/excrement of so-called "hosts", with purification confirmed via EM imaging, or
3. - wherein the purported "genome" of any alleged "avian influenza virus" was found intact in the bodily fluid/tissue/excrement of a "host" (as opposed to fabricated in silico, aka a computer model), or
4. - that scientifically demonstrate contagion of the illness / symptoms that are allegedly caused by purported "avian influenza viruses".
As usual, I asked that if any records matched the above description and were currently available elsewhere, I be provided citations so that I could identify and access them. I also stated that “If a timeframe is necessary, please use January 1, 1950 until the date of the search”.
I have previously reported that 1 month later, on August 22, 2024, Yvonne Marquez acting as Government Information Specialist indicated to me that they were working on the order and that “Any responsive documents that have been found will then be forwarded to me for review and possible release”. I published my response to Yvonne, and later updated the report with my January 2025 follow up attempt.
Update:
On March 17, 2025, 8 months after filing the FOIA order, I received a letter labelled #2024-APHIS-06103-F and “digitally signed by WALLACE KURALT for: Tonya G. Woods, Director, Freedom of Information & Privacy Act, Legislative and Public Affairs” (pg 14/15).
According to Tonya (emphasis added):
“…it is our determination that your request lacks sufficient specificity as to the program personnel required for this search, any specific program areas to search for responsive records, or date range for records in order to conduct a search for records responsive to your request.
… in order to attempt to best assist you, please note that VS program subject matter experts have provided two (2) documents, totaling twenty-nine (29) pages of records, appearing to be potentially responsive to your request…
Accordingly, due to the flaws in your original request rendering a reasonable search untenable, we are closing this request with this response and release…”
So, the timeframe that I had provided was ignored and 2 additional excuses were provided for supposedly not performing a search (which other institutions have conducted - see their official failures here).
Despite implying that a search hadn’t been conducted, Tonya, acting as Director, somehow provided 2 documents “appearing to be potentially responsive” 😂.
The first document (pg 16 - 32) is titled “Isolation of Avian Influenza and Avian Paramyxoviruses Viruses in Chicken Embryos from Avian Species”. Notice the oxymoronic reference to “isolation in chicken embryos”… and the emphasis that the alleged avian viruses and chicken embryos were from avian species.
This document is a protocol (describing pseudoscientific methodologies endorsed by the so-called “World Organization for Animal Health”), not a study. Thus, it cannot contain scientific evidence of an alleged virus or contagion.
This “isolation” protocol does not describe steps that could possibly result in scientific evidence of a virus or contagion or even evidence of a purported “genome”.
It does not require any potential viruses (particles) to be found and isolated per the normal definition of the word (aka purified), let alone sequenced and characterized for identification purposes or studied with valid controlled experiments to test for causation of a contagious illness.
(Purified particles would be required, before one could even attempt valid sequencing, characterization and scientific experiments.)
Instead, simply put, this protocol requires unpurified, unidentified material from the bodily fluid or tissue of chickens to be injected, along with antibiotics, through egg shells into embryos and for the eggs to be sealed with cement or quick-drying glue, then for the embryos to be monitored for death, and then for amnio-allantoic fluid to be removed and tested for a never-shown-to-exist virus, using a test that doesn’t test for a virus. Because “science”.
Here are the names of some of the people involved in this madness:
The 2nd document (pg 33 - 44) provided by Tonya G. Woods acting as Director is titled “Intravenous Pathogenicity Assessments for Avian Influenza Virus in Chickens”.
It is another protocol (for more pseudoscientific methodologies encouraged by the “World Organization for Animal Health”) and therefore does not contain scientific evidence of anything.
You can see based on the title that the authors frame intravenuous injections of so-called (viral) “isolate” as a valid way of testing whether a presumed virus causes illness in chickens, when it obviously is not. Chickens do not go around administering intravenuous injections of a fake “isolate” into each other. This procedure has nothing to do with how imaginary viruses are claimed to spread in nature. It lacks a valid exposure route, as well as a valid independent variable (purified particles, taken from “hosts”).
Here are the names of some of the people involved in this madness:
I finally responded to Tonya’s letter yesterday (pg 45 - 48); a partial screenshot is further below.
Many more official “bird flu” confessions and failures are HERE. And HERE is an important questionnaire for farmers to keep on hand and give to any “government” agents that want to inspect their animals.
Life in prison.
(Note: this information has been sent to ~200 people who work for “the state”, lamestream media, etc. at Canada, Isle of Man, England and the U.S., so that they cannot claim later that they did not know. It will also be sent to people who act in the Canadian “justice” system… that has falsely prosecuted people in relation to “germs”.)
If you would like to support my efforts, please see the Paypal button that is near the bottom of my homepage.
Addendum
Here is the World Organization for Animal Health’s “Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals, thirteenth edition 2024”.
Here is Chapter 3.3.4. of the manual, “Avian influenza (including infection with high pathogenicity avian influenza viruses) (version adopted in May 2021)”. The screenshot below is from page 5.
Recommended Germ/Contagion Reading/Viewing
How Lyme Disease was Weaponized - Dr Sam Bailey
WHO and the Pandemic Agreement - Kate Sugak
Another look at the Avian Bird Flu + Are Ostriches the solution to COVID? - Dr. Tom Cowan
The Mirror Cytopathic Effect - Mike Stone, viroLIEgy
Reflections of a Failed Pseudoscientific Hypothesis
RDCK Board, BC, gets warned of bird flu hoax confessions & potential criminal liability if they accept culled carcasses - Christine Massey, May 2025
English translation of a Dutch article by Sanne Burger:
Viruses don’t cause disease, because they don’t exist
Dan Dicks, long-time investigative journalist “in” Canada, is being lauded for his “real journalism” in covering the British Columbia ostrich farm angle of the “avian influenza” virus/contagion/antibodies hoax:
This Is Universal Ostrich Inc. – A Deep Dive With Press For Truth, featuring Dr. Andrew Kaufman and Christine Massey
Has a Virus Ever Actually Been Shown to Exist? - Dr. Tom Cowan with Jeremy Nell aka Jerm Warfare
Flu or cold is not caused by a virus (click icons at top right to translate)
Official FOI Confessions/Evidence Confirm that Virology is Pseudoscience
My notarized affidavit regarding the hundreds of freedom of information responses (FOIs) confirming the fraud and delusion of virology, with German and Greek translations:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/affidavit-re-foi-and-fraud-and-delusion-of-virology
Also at tinyurl.com/virus-affidavit
Freedom of Information Responses reveal that health/science institutions around the world (225 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 (the alleged convid virus) isolation/purification, anywhere, ever:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/
Excel file listing 225 institutions:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Institution-list-for-website.xlsx
FOI responses re other imaginary “viruses” (HIV, avian influenza, HPV, influenza, measles, etc., etc., etc.):
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-have-no-record-of-any-virus-having-been-isolated-purified-virology-isnt-a-science/
FOIs re secretive and unscientifically "mock infected" cells (aka invalid controls) and computer-model "viral genomes":
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/do-virologists-perform-valid-control-experiments-is-virology-a-science/
3000+ pages of "virus" FOIs in 8 compilation pdfs:
https://tinyurl.com/IsolationFOIs
Failed freedom of Information responses re contagion:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/freedom-of-information-responses-re-contagion/
Do health and science institutions have studies proving that bacteria CAUSE disease?
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/do-health-authorities-have-studies-proving-that-bacteria-cause-disease-lets-find-out-via-freedom-of-information/
Because "they" (HIV, influenza virus, HPV, measles virus, etc., etc., etc.) have never been shown to exist, clearly don't exist and virology isn't a science.
For truth, freedom and sanity,
Christine
A frustrated customer storms into the “The Lively Virus Shop,” gripping a vial labelled “Lively ‘Virus’ Sample.” The shop is a chaotic jungle of test tubes, petri dishes, and wildly uncalibrated lab equipment. A dusty, crooked sign above the counter reads: “We ‘Isolate’ the Liveliest ‘Viruses’ - So you Don’t Have To!” Next to it, a disclaimer in tiny print adds: “Definitions may vary. Refunds, however, are a known impossibility.”
Customer: [Slams vial onto the counter, rings the bell furiously] ‘Ello, I wish to register a complaint!
‘Virologist:’ [Enters cheerfully, lab coat covered in mysterious stains] Ah, yes sir! Welcome to “The Lively Virus Shop,” How can I assist you today?
Customer: Look, mate, I purchased this so-called ‘Lively Isolated' Parrot-Flu 'Virus’ from you not half an hour ago, and when I took it back to my lab… well, it’s dead!
‘Virologist:’ [Gasps theatrically, clutching chest] Dead? Oh no, no, no, sir! It’s not dead! It’s just dormant!
Customer: [Leaning in, fuming] Dormant?! The only thing it’s infecting is my patience! I’ve cultured it in Vero cells, flooded it with growth medium, and still - not a single cytopathic effect!
‘Virologist:’ [Smiling smugly, nodding] Ah, well, that’s where you’re mistaken, sir. It’s just… pining for Trypsin.
Customer: [Livid] Pining for Trypsin? What kind of nonsense is that? Look, I know a dead virus when I see one, and THIS, my friend, is stone-cold ‘virologically’ deceased!
‘Virologist:’ [Nods sagely] No, no, no, sir, it’s not dead - it’s just resting. Remarkable strain, ‘Parrot-Flu 'Virus,’ innit? Beautiful viral coat.
Customer: [Sarcastic, arms crossed] The viral coat doesn’t enter it! It’s completely non-infectious!
‘Virologist:’ [Pointing at the vial] Non-infectious? Oh no, no, no! It’s probably just having a nap after all those PCR amplifications. Happens all the time.
Customer: [Exploding, hands thrown up] NAPPING?! Look, mate, this virus wouldn’t bud if I injected it as part of blood serum directly into the brains of rabbits. It’s deader than Pasteur’s credibility!
‘Virologist:’ [Offended, crossing arms] Oh, come now! Don’t confuse ‘Parrot-Flu 'Virus,’ with the methods used for ‘West Nile River Virus.’ Different procedures, sir! You’ve simply got to be more patient – give it time to regenerate its spikes! Have you tried… [Winks cheekily] adding more Trypsin? Brings out the infectivity and spikes a treat!!
Customer: [Outraged, glaring] MORE Trypsin?! Mate, I’ve dumped that, and every toxic chemical known to science into this sample, and its still DOA! You sold me a dead virus!
‘Virologist:’ [Casually shakes the vial] There, see? It’s… gathering its strength!
Customer: [Furious, pointing] NO, IT ISN’T! You just shook the vial!
‘Virologist:’ [Feigning innocence] I did no such thing!
Customer: Yes, you did!
‘Virologist:’ [Casually shrugs] Alright, sir, let’s troubleshoot. Perhaps the problem lies in your cell culture conditions. Did you drown the cells in antibiotics to ensure it’s free of bacteria?
Customer: [Snaps, exasperated] Free of bacteria? The bacteria are fine, mate! It’s the 'virus' that’s gone to meet its maker! This 'virus' is no more! It has ceased to be! It has expired and gone to that big petri dish in the sky!
‘Virologist:’ [Still in denial, dismissive wave] Nonsense! It’s merely awaiting optimal conditions to display a proper cytopathic effect. Try running the PCR at 50 cycles - that should perk it up a bit!
Customer: [Furious, incredulous] PERK IT UP?! PERK IT UP?! Look, the PCR didn’t detect a single nucleotide! This 'virus' has shuffled off its proteinaceous coil, run down the replication curtain, and joined the bleedin’ quorum invisible! THIS IS AN EX-VIRUS!
‘Virologist:’ [Calmly, with a slight shrug] Well, if you’re that sure, I suppose I could offer you a… replacement sample…
Customer: [Sarcastic, arms crossed] Oh, wonderful. And will this one actually show some sign of life, or will it be as dead as the last one?
‘Virologist:’ [Grinning proudly] Oh no, no, no – this one’s a live one! Just isolated it this morning … from a computer model!
Customer: [Stares in disbelief] A… COMPUTER MODEL?!
‘Virologist:’ [Nods enthusiastically] The algorithms do all the work! No messy lab procedures, no awkward controls – just pure, state-of-the-art digital viroLIEgy!
Customer: [Storming out, shouting] That’s it, I’m done! You and your digital viruses can keep your bogus isolation! I’m off to find a real virus!
‘Virologist:’ [Calling after him, cheerfully] Well, if you find one, let me know! We could use it for the next Scamdemic!
Christine’s "Flight of the FOIA" asks the hawkward questions that’ve ruffled more feathers than a rooster doing laps in a hen spa. The squawked responses from the useful tools at innumerable Hellth agencies reveal their so-called ’evidence’ for birdy flu is nothing more than recycled chicken scratch—no eggscuse, just pure, unadulterated chicken shit.
The verdict? These turkeys, caught red-combed in a fowl play hoax, are flapping straight to a long coop sentence at Guano-tanamo Bay—where the only thing they'll be spreading is bird droppings and regret.
And if any of these birdbrains so much as peep about a prison break, they’d better watch the skies. Christine, ever hawkish for truth, will stoop with deadly precision, talons poised. She’ll have these quacks caged back up at beak-neck speed, faster than you can say "avian flu con job."
She is most talon-ted at sniffing out scientific nest fraud, clipping the wings of psyop parrots, and making the pigeons of propaganda sing like canaries on a truth perch.
So fret not, dear flock—the truth is no longer under feathered wraps. With Christine on the perch, no lie shall hatch unchallenged, no fake virus crow shall go uncawed, and no self-declared ‘science’ peacock shall strut unplucked.
Christine’s bird’s-eye view is fierce, her beak is sharp, and the chickens of corruption? They're finally coming home… to roast.