A small victory for NEXT LEVEL - a big one for the people ❗️
In short: Our spokesman Marvin Haberland won the process as expected, in which the court dropped the case and assumed the costs.
The subtleties in it are the great victory:
a) We went into this process without a lawyer
No lawyer wanted to defend us by supporting our strategy. So we didn't have any legal fees. So it works without it.
b) Our strategy is direct and clear
It aims to clarify the lack of scientific knowledge in virology in court, as Paragraph 1 of the Infection Protection Act requires it.
c) We have shown that the measures based on an imaginary virus are not justifiable and unsustainable.
d) As has been shown, no complicated strategies are required, no 400-page indictments. Only the basis must be attacked.
e) The possible avalanche effect
If many people followed our reasoning, either all fines would probably be stopped, or someone would go to the next instance, where the scientific nature would then have to be clarified.
f) Our strategy and expertise, as well as the non-rebuttable motions of evidence, were well known to all involved, both the judicial apparatus and the many staff who we contacted throughout to make it clear that we look forward to the trial. Perhaps this was also one of the reasons why our process was constantly being postponed and unclear statements were made by the employees.
Particularly important:
If the court, the state and others knew something that would allow them to make a legal example of us with regard to our requests for evidence, they certainly would have done so. So they obviously used the simplest "escape option" and simply stopped the process.
A notice:
We get our chance, we don't give up. Virology will get huge problems, we are sure.
We would like to thank all supporters who have the courage to do the right thing. YOU ARE WORLD CLASS ❤️🙏🏻
🎥 Here for the interview after the trial (incl. survey of the trial observers)
Supported by almost 100 spectators, Marvin's trial at the Hamburg District Court took place on April 26 in Hamburg, which was supposed to bring down the whole virology. See what we experienced here.
Dear Christine, from a legal perspective, the arguments available in Germany are NOT available in the United States. Note, under American jurisprudence, "facts" are accepted or rejected by triers of fact (a jury or a judge - and many states require defendants to pay for juries and court time, regardless of the outcome). If an American were charged with being in public or not wearing a mask, a defense that the lockdown was based on a declaration of presence of fairy dust, and that fairy dust does NOT exist, is irrelevant.
I think that the ONLY way to challenge is to demand a Declaratory Judgment that compels local cops to SHOW that a person is contagious or at risk of being infected.
I have asked Aaron Siri - multiple times - but no reply. (surprise). Best
I doubt this is going to get anywhere. Even if it does, it's going to be ignored by the media and buried because this issue is not just about virology but it is about a more profound lie at the root of so-called science - scientism. Remember that if viruses don't exist then they didn't evolve. This would make people question the validity of the theory of evolution and the origins of life. The greatest lie is about making sure that people don't ask the ultimate question in the end: if virology is a lie, maybe other sciences are a lie too, like evolutionary theory, cosmology like the Copernican Principle.
Remember, the first thing that evolutionary scientists jumped on was that the "novel" SARS COV2 must have evolved because that's what evolution does, it invents new life forms. Not one of the evolutionary experts would admit now how wrong they were. So, they had no choice but to switch their theory to a lab leak because the third possibility is not even allowed to be entertained...because when one lie is exposed the domino effect may not stop...
'The collective silence' is like a colossus. The Big Lie that towers above us all. King Convid! Yet it's a vacuous hollow that will be toppled and swept away by a tsunami of truthful scientific scrutiny and empowered common sense.
When i clicked on the URL for the interview, i got a very strange response, was told my browser couldn't open this, i would have to do it so via a different website, because the video was embedded on another page. I did get to Odyssey, got this URL which you can go to directly. An hour and 23 minutes, The Case Against Virology.
Virology on Trial near Hamburg, Germany Tomorrow!!
Update: the case against Marvin was dropped!
A quick and very satisfying update from NEXT LEVEL - Wissen neu gedacht on Telegram (https://t.me/NextLevelOriginal)!
Auto-translation:
A small victory for NEXT LEVEL - a big one for the people ❗️
In short: Our spokesman Marvin Haberland won the process as expected, in which the court dropped the case and assumed the costs.
The subtleties in it are the great victory:
a) We went into this process without a lawyer
No lawyer wanted to defend us by supporting our strategy. So we didn't have any legal fees. So it works without it.
b) Our strategy is direct and clear
It aims to clarify the lack of scientific knowledge in virology in court, as Paragraph 1 of the Infection Protection Act requires it.
c) We have shown that the measures based on an imaginary virus are not justifiable and unsustainable.
d) As has been shown, no complicated strategies are required, no 400-page indictments. Only the basis must be attacked.
e) The possible avalanche effect
If many people followed our reasoning, either all fines would probably be stopped, or someone would go to the next instance, where the scientific nature would then have to be clarified.
f) Our strategy and expertise, as well as the non-rebuttable motions of evidence, were well known to all involved, both the judicial apparatus and the many staff who we contacted throughout to make it clear that we look forward to the trial. Perhaps this was also one of the reasons why our process was constantly being postponed and unclear statements were made by the employees.
Particularly important:
If the court, the state and others knew something that would allow them to make a legal example of us with regard to our requests for evidence, they certainly would have done so. So they obviously used the simplest "escape option" and simply stopped the process.
A notice:
We get our chance, we don't give up. Virology will get huge problems, we are sure.
We would like to thank all supporters who have the courage to do the right thing. YOU ARE WORLD CLASS ❤️🙏🏻
🎥 Here for the interview after the trial (incl. survey of the trial observers)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xChZorQ8cxU
Virus in court - Marvin's court hearing
Supported by almost 100 spectators, Marvin's trial at the Hamburg District Court took place on April 26 in Hamburg, which was supposed to bring down the whole virology. See what we experienced here.
👉 Thanks to Jens for the documentation
(https://t.me/GFTV_HH/15564)➖➖➖➖➖
💬 Telegram contact person:
@KnowledgeNew Thought
👉 Subscribe to the channel (https://t.me/+45_jiwHo-NQ3ZDIy)
*****
Congratulations and thank you to Marvin and NEXT LEVEL!!
https://christinemasseyfois.substack.com/p/victory-in-court-virology-indefensible
Dear Christine, from a legal perspective, the arguments available in Germany are NOT available in the United States. Note, under American jurisprudence, "facts" are accepted or rejected by triers of fact (a jury or a judge - and many states require defendants to pay for juries and court time, regardless of the outcome). If an American were charged with being in public or not wearing a mask, a defense that the lockdown was based on a declaration of presence of fairy dust, and that fairy dust does NOT exist, is irrelevant.
I think that the ONLY way to challenge is to demand a Declaratory Judgment that compels local cops to SHOW that a person is contagious or at risk of being infected.
I have asked Aaron Siri - multiple times - but no reply. (surprise). Best
I doubt this is going to get anywhere. Even if it does, it's going to be ignored by the media and buried because this issue is not just about virology but it is about a more profound lie at the root of so-called science - scientism. Remember that if viruses don't exist then they didn't evolve. This would make people question the validity of the theory of evolution and the origins of life. The greatest lie is about making sure that people don't ask the ultimate question in the end: if virology is a lie, maybe other sciences are a lie too, like evolutionary theory, cosmology like the Copernican Principle.
Remember, the first thing that evolutionary scientists jumped on was that the "novel" SARS COV2 must have evolved because that's what evolution does, it invents new life forms. Not one of the evolutionary experts would admit now how wrong they were. So, they had no choice but to switch their theory to a lab leak because the third possibility is not even allowed to be entertained...because when one lie is exposed the domino effect may not stop...
'The collective silence' is like a colossus. The Big Lie that towers above us all. King Convid! Yet it's a vacuous hollow that will be toppled and swept away by a tsunami of truthful scientific scrutiny and empowered common sense.
Thank you Christine for bringing this to our attention. This is going to be interesting!
God Bless you and your endeavors.
Should be interesting....
Lots of good info plus Kate's interview with Marvin and an English transcript of the first 25 minutes on Truth Comes to Light dot com in case the link I'm going to include isn't accepted. https://truthcomestolight.com/marvin-haberland-katie-sugak-on-the-court-case-against-virology-april-26-2023-in-hamburg-germany/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Hi all
Best wishes and blessings for the court case. Thinking and praying for all involved. Good luck
to all.
When i clicked on the URL for the interview, i got a very strange response, was told my browser couldn't open this, i would have to do it so via a different website, because the video was embedded on another page. I did get to Odyssey, got this URL which you can go to directly. An hour and 23 minutes, The Case Against Virology.
https://odysee.com/$/embed/@katie.su:7/thecourtcaseagainstvirology:0?r=6oXqknZEoT1GDb19SgQyVEkNKtP5WvtT
I remember Marvin Haberland from a conversation with Tom Cowan and another with Sam Bailey
https://www.bitchute.com/video/LDr95jG08oa0/
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/Marvin-vs-Virology-COVID-Taken-To-Court:3
What, AGAIN?