Jay Couey admits no-virus people are right about fake "virus isolation", fake "sequencing" and no SARS-COV-2
yet clings to 4 imaginary endemic "coronaviruses"
Greetings and best wishes,
A document authored by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich was recently posted online, outlining a “covid” legal strategy.
In this article, Reiner referenced Dr. Mike Yeadon (who has moved on from the covid “virus” hypothesis altogether) and a presentation which Reiner considered “brilliant” and “scientific”, from a man who acts as science advisor to RFK Jr. and Children’s Health Defense, Jay Couey.
Reiner also included a summary of alleged covid-19 facts, based on Jay’s presentation. In this summary, the “SARS-COV-2” narrative has been dropped entirely, admitting that there was no such thing.
But, the summary does involve 4 imaginary endemic coronaviruses that are supposedly everywhere and detected by the tests that don’t test for a virus (as David Icke has so accurately called them).
The password for accessing Jay’s presentation is: oa7=JU48. I watched it, and found that at the outset Jay admitted that he was only presenting a “hypothesis” about 4 (imaginary) viruses (not science).
Jay also admitted that no-virus people are "largely correct" and "not wrong" in our objections regarding fake “virus isolation” and fake “virus sequencing” / metagenomics. And he admitted that all-cause mortality patterns fit the no-virus reality. (But for some reason this realization is “frustrating” for Jay. It seems he would be happier if there were more of a “need” for a “virus”. Maybe this has something to do with his boss?)
"It's frustrating because this is what gives the no virus people so much ground to stand on..."
"First of all, I assume that the protocols killed about everybody. It's hard for me to need any virus at all. When you do the real math, and you say, take away all the explainable deaths first, very little left for a real virus to have done. And I think people like Denis Rancourt and others have really come to that conclusion with the math.”
Yet at the same time, Jay asserted that the narrative of no-virus and that the protocols caused all the deaths (which isn't actually what most no-virus people say) is "dangerous" because it somehow enables the whole thing to happen all over again.
Maybe Jay has been working a little too hard like Del Bigtree, because this of course makes no sense. The no-virus reality is that there was no reason for anyone to have been tested or taken any sort of “measures”, 2020 should have been life-as-usual, and the phrase "covid-19" ought not even exist. Because there was no science showing a virus, or a new disease, or contagion. This is the exact opposite of enabling the whole thing to happen again.
Stranger still, Jay spoke of “influenza viruses”, “adenoviruses”, “clones of viruses” and "synthetic viruses” as though these things really exist. He made claims about “4 endemic coronaviruses” that supposedly exist but lack pandemic-potential, as well as “SARS virus”, “SARS-COV-2” (claiming “its” genome has been found intact via nanopore sequencing - which he also stated several months ago to Eric Coppolino but never followed through with the promised evidence).
"On this background we have been enriching and growing and finding and doing whatever with Coronaviruses, and they've been released over and over again, and increasing in the background that nobody's cared about. It is on this background that the pandemic occurred."
Jay even claimed that PCR tests are "hot" for “endemic/seeded coronaviruses”, calling them "crazy specific".
I certainly don't want to misinform anyone, so I wrote repeatedly to Jay and Reiner asking Jay to please share or cite the evidence he relies on for these many claims about “viruses”. Dr. Mike Yeadon, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Mary Holland were copied, in order to keep everyone in the loop.
Despite several attempts between April 15 and April 27, Jay has never responded:
A “respectful” exit?
Analytical chemist Saeed Qureshi reviewed Jay’s presentation and commented:
“I could not believe what he was saying. He is completely (100%) in agreement that the pandemic and all related paraphernalia (virus, COVID-19, spread, mortality, PCR, etc., have been false or used falsely)…
“… he implies or accepts that there is no virus. Still, he cannot and will not say it because it will ruin his credibility and career, like everyone else in the area and the subjects of virology and immunology. However, without saying it, he has accepted it very clearly.
“From the beginning, I have been saying clearly and loudly that there is no \/irus, no ***demic, and nocine. Immunologists, virologists, and medical experts are realizing this now.
“He is saying it in a way to have a “respectful” exit. Typical virology style – describe things in a confusing and convoluted way. He knows the flaws and lies about the virus/virology and getting out of it. I doubt he will continue on the “virus track,” the way he described the “science” in the presentation.”
Dr. Sam Bailey has a related new video, not to be missed:
Reiner Fuellmich's 'Coronaviruses' -- Dr Sam Bailey
For truth, sanity and freedom,
by: Christine: unincorporated woman
Slightly off topic, but I saw the best no virus talking point yesterday. Apparently, people who were vaccinated last year for Monkeypox in Chicago are having something of a relapse epidemic. So Monkeypox uses the oldest of old school of vaccines: live Vaccinia/Cow Pox. One brand, ACAM2000, is very old school, and is still cut into your arm, the other brand, Janeos, is injected, like flu/MMR/coof etc. The records of the last 600 years (remember, Jenner started the switch to Vaccinia/vaccination in 1790s, but direct Smallpox inoculation is over a millenia old and began in Europe in ernest in late 1500s/early 1600s), these records, clearly showed many did not buy the innoculation/vaccination theater and from the start said it does not prevent infection, but actually spured outbreaks, and caused the disease. Well, now we see the centuries derided naysayers appear correct. If the God of vaccine theater, Vaccinia, is a dud, they have nothing. Vaccinia is the key stone, and it is just plaster of paris. If you can pull people like Couey off of mRNA and make him explain why Vaccinia is a real thing but also a trick, maybe he will fully wake up. As long as people can talk about new, faulty vaccines, they have squiggle room. This takes the convo back to first principles, all vaccines are nonsense, many are not harmless, and they can't work because there is no there there.
To Christine and her CAPABLE readers:
I am placing this message here at the top of your comments section so it actually gets VIEWED and by the greatest number of people. The "drama" of the last few days is an example of what can happen when an anonymous online IDIOT decides he's a freakin' KNOW-IT-ALL and he knows more about historical events or movements than an OBVIOUS veteran who WAS ACTUALLY FREAKIN' THERE! I took great pains to offer the documentation that we made concerning much of what transpired in our dear old, NOW-DESTROYED "AIDS" dissident movement which we posted at the following link:
ONE GOOD THING that has arisen out of all of these misinterpretations and misunderstandings is that the persistent IGNORANCE of one of Christine's commenters here has permitted me the opportunity to explain and RE-EXPLAIN for you readers what actually happened in and to our old "AIDS" dissident movement. As anyone can see who is NOT burdened by reading comprehension deficiencies and who takes the time to read the above link, there are NUMEROUS allegations we made (along with proof from e-mails from --and actions taken by- Duesberg and his "THUGS") that there WERE INDEED many acts of suppression and censorship perpetrated by the Duesberg faction against Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos and her "Perth Group" of dissenting "AIDS" researchers.
These included e-mails from Celia Farber in CELIA'S own words which Celia CHOSE to use in MANY e-mails that she CHOSE to send (many of which I STILL HAVE). The confusion around Celia's role may stem from the fact that she proved to be a very useful idiot for the Duesberg Cabal, but I get the feeling that Farber was not always involved in the "Cabal's" plans. Celia was more of an incessant cheerleader --and she still is to this day-- for her hero and "Daddy figure" Peter Duesberg. Celia's e-mails were directed both privately to smaller groups of individual supporters of the Perth Group (sometimes but not always including yours truly) as well as more publicly to VERY LARGE lists of e-mail recipients.
Much of this "civil war" was carried out semi-privately starting in 2008 via a large and varying (over time) list of e-mail recipients of HIGHER LEVER members of the "AIDS" dissident movement. I was considered --at least for these purposes-- one such "higher level" "AIDS" dissident who was "privileged" to be placed on the ever-changing recipients' list much of the time. Some exceptions were some private replies that were sent by Celia and others, many of which I have also received from third party recipients since then. There were several even more private e-mail threads, many "sub-discussions", that took place among even smaller groups of recipients. We certainly had many private discussions of our own that were also carried out via e-mail by a small group of us Perth Group supporters, including yours truly.
For a few months in 2009, the discussions and fights were also occurring on an old "Yahoo Groups" group, before DAVID CROWE threatened legal action (as he was WONT to do back then) against the owner of the Yahoo Group, and the owner then deleted ALL of our discussions! (See: http://www.tig.org.za/Paradigm%20posts.htm for some snippets from some of those deleted discussions).
At any rate, Celia Farber is absolutely LYING--(or suffering from early onset memory loss??)-- when she now claims that no one was ever trying to stop Eleni or the Perth Group or suppress the Perth Group's efforts! We have taken the time to document the histories of BOTH the original "Rethinking AIDS" group of which I WAS a small contributor (I copy-edited the old newsletters from the OLD, original "RA" group) AS WELL AS all the more unsavory history of the NEW, Rethinking AIDS "2.0" group that Duesberg and his cabal decided they needed to revive circa 2005 (with a lot of assistance from the always willing, dutiful and EAGER DAVID CROWE!).
Those histories are still available at the following link:
http://www.tig.org.za/History_of_Rethinking_AIDS_1.htm (follow all the way through from PART 1 to PART 6)
The opportunities for our old "AIDS" dissident movement in South Africa vis-a-vis President Mbkei's AIDS Advisory Panel were the greatest, most significant opportunities that ANY medical dissident movement EVER HAD! The history of what transpired and what did NOT transpire in South Africa is also documented at the histories #s1 through 6, available at the link above, and there are even more analyses at the following links:
I may comment later about the old exchanges in Continuum Magazine that took place between Duesberg and the Perth Group which Christine has referenced below. That "drama" that occurred in 1996-97 may need some clarification, too. However, that "event" was not only much older but, in my view, it was also actually much less injurious to the Perth Group and the "AIDS" dissident movement at large than the debacle that took place in South Africa in the early 2000s and all the subsequent Machiavellian acts of deceit that were perpetrated by the Duesberg cabal later on once they resuscitated the RA "2.0" group circa the mid 2000s.
BIG THANKS to those who actually LISTEN and those who aren't afraid to have their heroes questioned!