Brilliant stack per usual, Christine, w/all these invaluable, additional resources that have continued to debunk the non-existent "boogey-man Cov19 virus"as well as the "consensus" on ALL so-called viruses.
You are simply one of the best investigators out there & we are deeply appreciative of your hard work.
<3
And btw - I posted your article link here over on MCrispinMiller's stack just now w/my comment >
I think Joshua Quick was right when he said that there's an assembly error in the first version of Wuhan-Hu-1 and that they fixed the 3' tail in the third version by doing RACE. In the first version of Wuhan-Hu-1 at GenBank, they accidentally included a 618-base segment of human DNA at the 3' end, where the first 20 of the 618 bases are actually part of the real genome of SARS 2. In the second version they removed the last 598 bases from the 3' end, but they ended up missing a part of the real tail of SARS 2 which was added in the third version. Another assembly error was that in the first and second versions, they accidentally included a wrong 27-base segment at the 5' end, where the last 24 bases of the segment are identical to a segment near the 3' end of Wuhan-Hu-1. I have found similar assembly errors in other SARS-like viruses, like RfGB02, SoD, Sin3408, Rs7907, Rs7931, and Ra7909. I described it in more detail in this HTML file, where I also addressed some of the other questions that Quick was asked: https://output.jsbin.com/suwuxoy.
Thanks for your help and efforts. Be sure to have a week off or a month, now and again. I subscribed just to attempt a moderate support of your past work. Which for me, was enough. So now I hope you can live into the macobe humor of our foibled human and institutional tendancies.
Somehow I hope we can live into the cure of placebo and no-ceebo effects and affects. And we can deprogram the "in silico virus" back out of our human fears and froughts.
Carl Smythe has a new twitter account (last one was suspended).
He is extraordinarily rude. There are dozens of reasons why you might not be able to find the response, or maybe never got one from U of Sheffield. He just jumps to the conclusion that you are lying. How rude.
I tried engaging with him for a while, but it's all ad hom, so I blocked him.
Brilliant stack per usual, Christine, w/all these invaluable, additional resources that have continued to debunk the non-existent "boogey-man Cov19 virus"as well as the "consensus" on ALL so-called viruses.
You are simply one of the best investigators out there & we are deeply appreciative of your hard work.
<3
And btw - I posted your article link here over on MCrispinMiller's stack just now w/my comment >
https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/p/as-german-study-finds-that-vaccination/comment/16617347
I think Joshua Quick was right when he said that there's an assembly error in the first version of Wuhan-Hu-1 and that they fixed the 3' tail in the third version by doing RACE. In the first version of Wuhan-Hu-1 at GenBank, they accidentally included a 618-base segment of human DNA at the 3' end, where the first 20 of the 618 bases are actually part of the real genome of SARS 2. In the second version they removed the last 598 bases from the 3' end, but they ended up missing a part of the real tail of SARS 2 which was added in the third version. Another assembly error was that in the first and second versions, they accidentally included a wrong 27-base segment at the 5' end, where the last 24 bases of the segment are identical to a segment near the 3' end of Wuhan-Hu-1. I have found similar assembly errors in other SARS-like viruses, like RfGB02, SoD, Sin3408, Rs7907, Rs7931, and Ra7909. I described it in more detail in this HTML file, where I also addressed some of the other questions that Quick was asked: https://output.jsbin.com/suwuxoy.
whew. Looks like i have some reading ahead of me. Thanks for all this.
What happened to Kevin Corbett kn the meantime? His recent Substack post is just a rant about “divisiveness,” and he deletes critical comments.
Thanks for your help and efforts. Be sure to have a week off or a month, now and again. I subscribed just to attempt a moderate support of your past work. Which for me, was enough. So now I hope you can live into the macobe humor of our foibled human and institutional tendancies.
Somehow I hope we can live into the cure of placebo and no-ceebo effects and affects. And we can deprogram the "in silico virus" back out of our human fears and froughts.
I love Tom Cowan.
Great post, per usual!!! xo Thanks, CM. ^_^
in vitro, veritas...
;)
👊🏻
Just Quick's quick admission by itself is ...HUGE! Thanks, Christine, i am so sharing this!!
Carl Smythe has a new twitter account (last one was suspended).
He is extraordinarily rude. There are dozens of reasons why you might not be able to find the response, or maybe never got one from U of Sheffield. He just jumps to the conclusion that you are lying. How rude.
I tried engaging with him for a while, but it's all ad hom, so I blocked him.
https://twitter.com/search?q=CarlSmythe%20OR%20CarlSmytheCells%20podcastbill%20OR%20williamahuston%20massey%20OR%20christine&src=typed_query&f=live
.
If You Are Vaccinated
It Is Too Bad That You
Hate Speech.
Because As We Have Been Saying
All Along
“Boy Does That Vaccine Hate You”
.
evil who is shedding wef
Great article Christine, and thanks for all your work in this time of lies and murder.
to Joshua Quick and Carl Smythe, I am happy to call you two, liars, crooks and frauds. If you want to sue me, please, please, do so.
Contact me via my substack - :Carl-david: