I've banned the obnoxious psycho-babbler "James True". Life is too short. Anyone interested in his claims can go read his evidence-free comments directed at me under Craig Hutchinson's evidence-free smear article on the heroic Baileys.
A new virus called Donkeypox is sending a chill up the spines of conservatives across the country. Alternative media pundits say the disease is much more credible and dangerous than Monkeypox.
Have you every read the isolation process? even a highschooler could see the problems with the official isolation process ... perhaps you need a refresher on this non-sense they call virus isolation
So let's say we have a sample that we want to test for a specific so-called “virus” and we want to isolate[1] this so-called virus. In order to do this we need some type of live medium, such as an organ. They then intentionally create an environment they are looking for by introducing various things that increase the number of exosomes in the medium, by adding fetal bovine serum (FBS) which contains a large number of exosomes[2]. They then add in toxic antibiotics and amphotericin[3] which has specific toxicity to the organ they are working with in the test. This would then cause the live medium they are working with to pump out more exosomes to pull out the toxic matter that was created by adding in these toxins. Once the FBS is added it contaminates the original sample to the point that they can’t separate it from the FBS[4] [5] or distinguish between the two.
Exosomes are essentially garbage collectors of dead cellular matter which have been affected by the environmental toxins[6] , aging[7], and/or lifestyle, but they also carry out many other tasks like regulating skin[8], endocannabinoid lipid transport[9] [10], managing inflammation[11], cell signaling[12] [13], immune system[14] and more[15] [16]. There is research that shows scientists can’t separate so-called viruses from exosomes because they are so much alike in density.[17] [18] They have to create the environment to produce what they are looking for in the isolation experiments. If they did a control without the antibiotics and FBS, they likely wouldn’t get the same results, because the results they are looking for require them to include toxins to get a massive dump of exosomes pulling out toxins, so they then conclude that the sample is what is causing the problem.
Scientists are looking at exosomes and calling them viruses, by looking at the detox mechanisms and the ‘bystander effect’ which is mentioned in a number of radiation studies[19] [20] [21] [22] and making the assumptions that these exosomes are something viral without actually confirming person to person transmission. Many attempts over the last 100+ years have been made to prove “con”-tagion but there is no clear research which meets Koch’s Postulates that can prove such concepts. Where is the control to see if all these FBS & toxins they are adding are creating an environment that is causing the problem with the live medium?
Another example is women living together or being around each other can in some cases sync periods due to something called the alpha uterus. This is a form of detox, but we would never consider menstruation a contagion right? There have also been reports of women's menstrual migraine and cramps syncing to other women. So just because humans may detox at that same time doesn’t mean that something was physically transferred in order to cause a detox response, as both individuals are in the same environment. Or what about couvade syndrome, where men start to experience symptoms like their pregnant partner?
I'm not aware of organs being used, rather they take a sample of fluid (i.e. lung fluid, boogers), tissue or excrement from the patient and add it to a cell line. Also, I'm not aware that "exosomes" have been purified and studied either, and some consider the particles to be cellular debris.
But you seem to understand the basic problems. They can't find the alleged particles directly in the bodily fluid/tissue, and only spot them after the unnatural, unscientific cell culture process. So they are part of the outcome (dependent variable), not the independent variable. Plus they haven't been purified, sequenced, characterized and shown to cause any illness, let alone hijack cell, blah blah.
Thats why its so crazy the FDA tried to block the sale of NAC during the height of the scamdemic ...
The importance of NAC (N-acetyl-cysteine) in detox, overdose, and disease. NAC assists in exosome production.
“A potential restorative activity of NAC therapy is the inhibition of age-associated protein oxidation, misfolding, and aggregation by preventing sensitive-cysteine oxidative impairment related to aging. The 3D structures of proteins can suffer conformational changes when they accumulate oxidative damage [383]. The shift from a-helix to b-sheet is typical of amyloid and other protein accumulations. Structural modifications probably occur in proteins with redundant amino acid arrangements, such as polyglutamine in HD. Chaperones assist proteins in reaching their functional structure in physiological situations. However, in aging, the delicate equilibrium among protein synthesis, folding, and clearance can diminish, culminating in the aggregation of misfolded proteins. The assemblage of misfolded proteins contributes to the pathogenesis of age-associated neurodegenerative diseases, such as AD, PD, and HD, which NAC treatment can presumably repair. Cysteine-bearing compounds, such as GSH, NAC, and N-acetyl-cysteine amide (NACA) may preclude exosome production from oxidative and pro-inflammatory triggers through scavenging and preventing thiol-reactive substrates [195,196]. NAC can correct exosome induction, arrangements, and actions to comparable levels of unexposed cells instead of completely inhibiting exosome signaling. Hence, NAC prevents oxidative shifts in exosome signaling without interrupting their physiological roles [195,196].”
Right, but have the particles actually been purified and studied scientifically? I've not looked deeply into it myself, but I believe Mike Stone and some others don't believe the particles labelled "exosomes" have been studied properly to know what they are or what they do either. I could be wrong.
They cant isolate further than exosomes, thats what they are looking at as exosomes pull out the cellular debris and toxins. Even HIV is classified as exosome by researchers researching HIV.
“the virus [HIV] is fully an exosome in every sense of the word“
-Dr. James Hildreth, M.D
President and Chief Executive Officer of MeHarry Medical College
You are taking to the wrong agency. I’d you want to know about the signs, symptoms etc of any disease, you should be talking to CDC and/or NIH. FDA is a food product and drug product safety and efficacy agency.
First of all, my FOIA order was not an attempt to gather info about the signs, symptoms etc of any purported disease.
Secondly, a valid assessment of the accuracy of "tests" and the efficacy of quackcines and other products relating to an alleged "virus" requires a valid gold standard. Without a valid gold standard it's impossible to conduct valid assessments. Yet this is what the FDA falsely claims to be doing - conducting assessments in relation to a purported thing that in fact they can't even show exists (and that no one else can either). FDA agents hold themselves out as having expertise and knowledge on matters of which they actually know nothing and cannot know anything because there is no foundation to the "virus" narrative to begin with. You're free to give them a pass on such fraud and delusion and declare it "wrong" to put them to the test and thereby enable further fraud and delusion if you wish. I choose not to.
Thirdly, immediately after I finished describing my communications with Sarah, I provided a link to "Many more failed FOI responses relating to the fake/false/fraudulent “monkeypox virus”". If you click on the link you will find exactly that, including responses from the CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, NIAID, New Zealand‘s crown research institute, the Institute of Environmental Science and Research, NZ Ministry of Health, Health Canada and Public Health Agency of Canada, Sweden’s Public Health Authority Folkhälsomyndigheten, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, etc.
I’m a microbiologist and have look at the studies. FDA evaluates safety and effectiveness through review of supplied documentation. Results of double blind randomized trials. I doubt you have the technical ability to understand these based on what I’ve read from what you’ve shared here. Maybe you should try studying a bit and become truly educated on the science before you start spouting off your opinions as fact. You should be ashamed.
Your background is irrelevant and of zero interest to me, as is your ad hominem approach. I'm quite aware of the evidence passed off by virologists, having looking at many studies over the past 4.5 years. It's pseudoscience by definition. Virologists always rely on indirect evidence and circular reasoning.
The trials do not involve direct evidence of any "virus", nor are the "tests" they rely on validated. And they can't be validated because the alleged "virus" was never shown to exist in the first place. If I'm wrong, cite a valid scientific study. Appeals to authority and attempts to shame me will be a waste of your time.
Thanks Christine! I will forward to “my representatives” here in CA, and will share with other people in positions of “authority. These important confessions will be on record. No logic isn’t Sarah’s thing…clearly she is stupid or corrupted by the pharmafia, maybe both.
Sarcasm is a symptom of internal self-hatred. If you can’t be honest with your own throat chakra why are you corrupting people’s ears? Look at how much work you are putting into ignoring me. All of this is a mirror for you. Of course I am wrong and horrible. But that has nothing to do with you and your relationship with your body. You need to work on your ego. Stop hating it. Reconsider yourself and stop being so mean to people you just met.
James, we had much back and forth already under Craig Hutchinson's evidence-free smear piece on the Baileys and JBS. I challenged you many times to cite valid scientific evidence of the "rabies virus" you claim exists and all I got from you was links to your substack... which is not a valid scientific study. I'm not going to tolerate your off-topic psychobabble here. I will simply block you if you continue because I wasted enough time with you already.
Media is a contagion. So is insisting contagion doesn’t exist. Both of these are virus. All of your dna is informed by transposons. Transposons are protein shells with genetic information. These are the fortune cookies of the body. The only difference between contagion and resonance is the desire to call someone “wrong.” https://jamestrue.substack.com/p/the-paradox-of-medicine
No one here cares about your claims unless you can cite valid scientific evidence to back them up, as I've already explained to you. Everyone can go read your obnoxious and evidence-free comments directed at me under Craig Hutchinson's evidence-free smear article.
That’s odd Jeff, can you tell me more because my article is trending right now and has been picked up by a couple of sources. I even went live about it tonight and people were pretty clear on what it says and what it’s about. Lots of feedback.
Maybe you are slow, or depressed, or just lying to yourself?
Sorry to have to say this, but…. Just to be clear (for the trolls and the virus-denier community), MPox or Monkeypox is a virus. Viruses are actually a thing. They exist. And I am guilty of being a virologist. I have isolated, grown, and studied viruses that infect animals and bacteria. Monkeypox is a DNA virus. Monkeypox virus has been isolated, cultured, and imaged.
At the top of this essay, I have included electron micrograph images of MPox (or Monkeypox) viruses. If you pop open a monkeypox lesion from an infected person’s body and rub the fluid on your skin, you will get infected and develop monkeypox disease. If you insist on shouting at me that viruses don’t exist, I invite you to perform this experiment on yourself. And, being only human myself, the immortal words of Elon Musk come to my mind (GFY). Enough said.
Oh geez, I almost gave you an angry response, then noticed you were quoting the Mal-one. Only paid subscribers can point out his illogic and lack of valid scientific evidence. Maybe I'll send him an email.
I've banned the obnoxious psycho-babbler "James True". Life is too short. Anyone interested in his claims can go read his evidence-free comments directed at me under Craig Hutchinson's evidence-free smear article on the heroic Baileys.
Have you heard about 'Donkeypox' yet?
A new virus called Donkeypox is sending a chill up the spines of conservatives across the country. Alternative media pundits say the disease is much more credible and dangerous than Monkeypox.
https://www.newworldhumor.com/p/donkeypox-virus-strikes-fear-in-conservatives
Who's gonna stop these evil doers?
from SLAY news :
https://slaynews.com/news/fda-admits-zero-scientific-evidence-monkeypox-virus-exists/
happy to see your work being recognized, Christine
Sweet, thank you for letting me know Malca :) It would be so amazing if this info would go mainstream soon!
Have you every read the isolation process? even a highschooler could see the problems with the official isolation process ... perhaps you need a refresher on this non-sense they call virus isolation
So let's say we have a sample that we want to test for a specific so-called “virus” and we want to isolate[1] this so-called virus. In order to do this we need some type of live medium, such as an organ. They then intentionally create an environment they are looking for by introducing various things that increase the number of exosomes in the medium, by adding fetal bovine serum (FBS) which contains a large number of exosomes[2]. They then add in toxic antibiotics and amphotericin[3] which has specific toxicity to the organ they are working with in the test. This would then cause the live medium they are working with to pump out more exosomes to pull out the toxic matter that was created by adding in these toxins. Once the FBS is added it contaminates the original sample to the point that they can’t separate it from the FBS[4] [5] or distinguish between the two.
Exosomes are essentially garbage collectors of dead cellular matter which have been affected by the environmental toxins[6] , aging[7], and/or lifestyle, but they also carry out many other tasks like regulating skin[8], endocannabinoid lipid transport[9] [10], managing inflammation[11], cell signaling[12] [13], immune system[14] and more[15] [16]. There is research that shows scientists can’t separate so-called viruses from exosomes because they are so much alike in density.[17] [18] They have to create the environment to produce what they are looking for in the isolation experiments. If they did a control without the antibiotics and FBS, they likely wouldn’t get the same results, because the results they are looking for require them to include toxins to get a massive dump of exosomes pulling out toxins, so they then conclude that the sample is what is causing the problem.
Scientists are looking at exosomes and calling them viruses, by looking at the detox mechanisms and the ‘bystander effect’ which is mentioned in a number of radiation studies[19] [20] [21] [22] and making the assumptions that these exosomes are something viral without actually confirming person to person transmission. Many attempts over the last 100+ years have been made to prove “con”-tagion but there is no clear research which meets Koch’s Postulates that can prove such concepts. Where is the control to see if all these FBS & toxins they are adding are creating an environment that is causing the problem with the live medium?
Another example is women living together or being around each other can in some cases sync periods due to something called the alpha uterus. This is a form of detox, but we would never consider menstruation a contagion right? There have also been reports of women's menstrual migraine and cramps syncing to other women. So just because humans may detox at that same time doesn’t mean that something was physically transferred in order to cause a detox response, as both individuals are in the same environment. Or what about couvade syndrome, where men start to experience symptoms like their pregnant partner?
Open letter by many Medical Professionals
https://drsambailey.com/resources/settling-the-virus-debate/
(Follow-up) https://drsambailey.com/resources/videos/viruses-unplugged/virus-debate/
A Farewell To Virology (Expert Edition)
https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition
[1] wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/6/20-0516_article
[2] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7952636/
[3] “miltefosine and amphotericin B; drugs that are far from ideal due to host toxicity,” -
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32628683/
[4] https://inflammation.life/dr_cowan_fbs.jpg
[5] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977539/
[6] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5837599/
[7] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8393989/
[8] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254055/
[9] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25568329/
[10] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30758141/
[11] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30758141/
[12] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28983919
[13] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25272880
[14] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9885214/
[15] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9961790/
[16] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36834471/
[17] (2020) “However, to date, a reliable method that can actually guarantee a complete separation does not exist.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7291340
[18] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4881422/
[19] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4829325/
[20] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9029583/
[21] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5344502/
[22] https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/bystander-effect#
My Comment was replying to @Tony, but the sign-in process must have removed it as a sub comment ...
I was wondering why you were lecturing me lol :) Cheers.
Do you have any input from what i wrote above? do you know if there is any additional isolation steps that I missed?
I'm not aware of organs being used, rather they take a sample of fluid (i.e. lung fluid, boogers), tissue or excrement from the patient and add it to a cell line. Also, I'm not aware that "exosomes" have been purified and studied either, and some consider the particles to be cellular debris.
But you seem to understand the basic problems. They can't find the alleged particles directly in the bodily fluid/tissue, and only spot them after the unnatural, unscientific cell culture process. So they are part of the outcome (dependent variable), not the independent variable. Plus they haven't been purified, sequenced, characterized and shown to cause any illness, let alone hijack cell, blah blah.
Thats why its so crazy the FDA tried to block the sale of NAC during the height of the scamdemic ...
The importance of NAC (N-acetyl-cysteine) in detox, overdose, and disease. NAC assists in exosome production.
“A potential restorative activity of NAC therapy is the inhibition of age-associated protein oxidation, misfolding, and aggregation by preventing sensitive-cysteine oxidative impairment related to aging. The 3D structures of proteins can suffer conformational changes when they accumulate oxidative damage [383]. The shift from a-helix to b-sheet is typical of amyloid and other protein accumulations. Structural modifications probably occur in proteins with redundant amino acid arrangements, such as polyglutamine in HD. Chaperones assist proteins in reaching their functional structure in physiological situations. However, in aging, the delicate equilibrium among protein synthesis, folding, and clearance can diminish, culminating in the aggregation of misfolded proteins. The assemblage of misfolded proteins contributes to the pathogenesis of age-associated neurodegenerative diseases, such as AD, PD, and HD, which NAC treatment can presumably repair. Cysteine-bearing compounds, such as GSH, NAC, and N-acetyl-cysteine amide (NACA) may preclude exosome production from oxidative and pro-inflammatory triggers through scavenging and preventing thiol-reactive substrates [195,196]. NAC can correct exosome induction, arrangements, and actions to comparable levels of unexposed cells instead of completely inhibiting exosome signaling. Hence, NAC prevents oxidative shifts in exosome signaling without interrupting their physiological roles [195,196].”
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/11/2/416
Many research quotes on exosomes here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jyHyTEsfP_cfEn0vEqtfi6WZsD4izSxEBCE9eKhTnIE/edit#heading=h.l67uon8dcola
Right, but have the particles actually been purified and studied scientifically? I've not looked deeply into it myself, but I believe Mike Stone and some others don't believe the particles labelled "exosomes" have been studied properly to know what they are or what they do either. I could be wrong.
They cant isolate further than exosomes, thats what they are looking at as exosomes pull out the cellular debris and toxins. Even HIV is classified as exosome by researchers researching HIV.
“the virus [HIV] is fully an exosome in every sense of the word“
-Dr. James Hildreth, M.D
President and Chief Executive Officer of MeHarry Medical College
Former Professor at John Hopkins
HIV Researcher
Journal of Cell Biology
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC2248418/pdf/jcb1620960.pdf
hi Christine, I messaged you... i shared with you my book
A Massachusetts is town enforcing curfew due to 1 person supposedly getting equine encephalitis virus from mosquito bite.
What are the chances no health agency has proof of the existence of EEE virus on file?
https://x.com/BGatesIsaPyscho/status/1827631451535225274
Hi Brent, that's insane. I've not been able to FOI hundreds of institutions for every alleged virus, but do have the CDC on record:
CDC FOIA confession: no scientific evidence of any encephalitis "virus"
https://christinemasseyfois.substack.com/p/cdc-foia-confession-no-scientific
Of course, it’s a very bad joke
You are taking to the wrong agency. I’d you want to know about the signs, symptoms etc of any disease, you should be talking to CDC and/or NIH. FDA is a food product and drug product safety and efficacy agency.
First of all, my FOIA order was not an attempt to gather info about the signs, symptoms etc of any purported disease.
Secondly, a valid assessment of the accuracy of "tests" and the efficacy of quackcines and other products relating to an alleged "virus" requires a valid gold standard. Without a valid gold standard it's impossible to conduct valid assessments. Yet this is what the FDA falsely claims to be doing - conducting assessments in relation to a purported thing that in fact they can't even show exists (and that no one else can either). FDA agents hold themselves out as having expertise and knowledge on matters of which they actually know nothing and cannot know anything because there is no foundation to the "virus" narrative to begin with. You're free to give them a pass on such fraud and delusion and declare it "wrong" to put them to the test and thereby enable further fraud and delusion if you wish. I choose not to.
Thirdly, immediately after I finished describing my communications with Sarah, I provided a link to "Many more failed FOI responses relating to the fake/false/fraudulent “monkeypox virus”". If you click on the link you will find exactly that, including responses from the CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, NIAID, New Zealand‘s crown research institute, the Institute of Environmental Science and Research, NZ Ministry of Health, Health Canada and Public Health Agency of Canada, Sweden’s Public Health Authority Folkhälsomyndigheten, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, etc.
I’m a microbiologist and have look at the studies. FDA evaluates safety and effectiveness through review of supplied documentation. Results of double blind randomized trials. I doubt you have the technical ability to understand these based on what I’ve read from what you’ve shared here. Maybe you should try studying a bit and become truly educated on the science before you start spouting off your opinions as fact. You should be ashamed.
Your background is irrelevant and of zero interest to me, as is your ad hominem approach. I'm quite aware of the evidence passed off by virologists, having looking at many studies over the past 4.5 years. It's pseudoscience by definition. Virologists always rely on indirect evidence and circular reasoning.
The trials do not involve direct evidence of any "virus", nor are the "tests" they rely on validated. And they can't be validated because the alleged "virus" was never shown to exist in the first place. If I'm wrong, cite a valid scientific study. Appeals to authority and attempts to shame me will be a waste of your time.
Zero evidence about monkeypox. 100% evidence about moneypox
Thanks Christine! I will forward to “my representatives” here in CA, and will share with other people in positions of “authority. These important confessions will be on record. No logic isn’t Sarah’s thing…clearly she is stupid or corrupted by the pharmafia, maybe both.
Thank you so much Jeff!
Have you asked the CDC the same??
Yes and many other institutions. See the link I provided in the article to other "monkeypox virus" FOIs, or go to my previous article.
Thank you.
Sarcasm is a symptom of internal self-hatred. If you can’t be honest with your own throat chakra why are you corrupting people’s ears? Look at how much work you are putting into ignoring me. All of this is a mirror for you. Of course I am wrong and horrible. But that has nothing to do with you and your relationship with your body. You need to work on your ego. Stop hating it. Reconsider yourself and stop being so mean to people you just met.
James, we had much back and forth already under Craig Hutchinson's evidence-free smear piece on the Baileys and JBS. I challenged you many times to cite valid scientific evidence of the "rabies virus" you claim exists and all I got from you was links to your substack... which is not a valid scientific study. I'm not going to tolerate your off-topic psychobabble here. I will simply block you if you continue because I wasted enough time with you already.
You’re bored because you don’t read Christine. You don’t read because you don’t respect yourself.
You're so scientific, thanks!
It's just boredom from your ongoing inability to cite valid scientific evidence and citing your blog instead.
Media is a contagion. So is insisting contagion doesn’t exist. Both of these are virus. All of your dna is informed by transposons. Transposons are protein shells with genetic information. These are the fortune cookies of the body. The only difference between contagion and resonance is the desire to call someone “wrong.” https://jamestrue.substack.com/p/the-paradox-of-medicine
No one here cares about your claims unless you can cite valid scientific evidence to back them up, as I've already explained to you. Everyone can go read your obnoxious and evidence-free comments directed at me under Craig Hutchinson's evidence-free smear article.
Dude you sound very delusional to me. Get help.
That’s odd Jeff, can you tell me more because my article is trending right now and has been picked up by a couple of sources. I even went live about it tonight and people were pretty clear on what it says and what it’s about. Lots of feedback.
Maybe you are slow, or depressed, or just lying to yourself?
Yawn. Funny how there's zero scientific evidence of contagion of illness and much evidence against it.
Mr Malone disagrees with you:
https://substack.com/@abuseproductions810557/note/c-66078902
No kidding. But he has no valid scientific evidence, so who cares?
He wrote:
Sorry to have to say this, but…. Just to be clear (for the trolls and the virus-denier community), MPox or Monkeypox is a virus. Viruses are actually a thing. They exist. And I am guilty of being a virologist. I have isolated, grown, and studied viruses that infect animals and bacteria. Monkeypox is a DNA virus. Monkeypox virus has been isolated, cultured, and imaged.
At the top of this essay, I have included electron micrograph images of MPox (or Monkeypox) viruses. If you pop open a monkeypox lesion from an infected person’s body and rub the fluid on your skin, you will get infected and develop monkeypox disease. If you insist on shouting at me that viruses don’t exist, I invite you to perform this experiment on yourself. And, being only human myself, the immortal words of Elon Musk come to my mind (GFY). Enough said.
Perhaps the fda, cdc, and all the other “health authorities” who cannot find a shred of science should reach out to Malone for help.
Oh geez, I almost gave you an angry response, then noticed you were quoting the Mal-one. Only paid subscribers can point out his illogic and lack of valid scientific evidence. Maybe I'll send him an email.
His appeal to authority, lack of proof, and short answer are a fail for me.