"Public health" and food inspection actors in Canada will be gearing up their H5N1 hoax this week.
They have been fraudulently testing lactating cows for the imaginary "H5N1" (with a test that couldn't confirm the presence of a "virus" even if it had been shown to exist) and expect to start releasing the results and revving up the propaganda.
Video of a May 9th roundtable discussion featuring Theresa Tam, Bonnie Henry, Kieran Moore, etc:
Bizarrely, Theresa Tam invited me - presumably by accident - to the round table discussion with pseudoscientists and medical officers, etc from PHAC and Ontario, BC and Quebec. I got to sit in with no one questioning who I was or why I was there - lol.
Please keep your wits about you when attending conferences and taking air flights where beverages and foods are served to persons individually (not buffet style).
Let's not forget that Dr. Rashid Buttar was poisoned.
Such incidences do not happen by accident when the Globalists have their blacklisted targets... as is the case where STRIPE targeted your Substack account.
Wow, I just watched that whole conference call and not one empirically scientific statement or piece of information shared on anyone's behalf. All of them happily speaking speculative rhetoric in order to take home a healthy paycheck and to feel like they're so fucking important. They're all quite literally sociopaths.
Christine I admire your work but I must object to your blocking anyone. Blocking is censoring. Do you like to be censored? I'm sure you don't. But when you do something to others that you don't like, it means you are not using the Golden Rule which is do unto others. But it has serious consequences - it shows you consent to censorship and therefore censorship will continue to run amok. What goes around comes around. Please reinstate him. Don't spend any time on him, just scroll by but shutting down someone's voice is a superior attitude, the attitude that has us in this mess we're in. Please don't block me for objecting, simply respond or don't respond. I hope you understand the seriousness of censorship. If you do it, it means you consent to it. That is how it is read by dark forces. We must not be like them, we must be of light.
It's no coincidence that many bird deaths are occurring where cell towers are popping up. Influenza is an electromagnetic illness, and always has been, even before cell towers:
Please be aware of fake Telegram channels using my name and photograph. Only the genuine channel has a short video of me spelling out the name of the genuine channel.
Mike I can't express how much I admire what you do. You really stick your neck out. Thank you so much. But why are you not censuring Christine for blocking? Why must people block? It truly bothers me no end, because it gives the oligarchs more ammunition when we do it. We must always be on the side of free expression and even make it contemptible to censor. There are practically no cases to do it, at least not unilaterally. This subject gets little attention but we really need to talk about it because it is crucial for our progress. We need to stand together when we see it happen, that's another way we will keep ourselves strong. I love Christine's work too but if one truly cares about truth and freedom, we must create a front that absolutely abhors censorship. Best regards Mike.
Hi Dr. Yeadon. Substack gives the blocker the choice of automatically deleting all the comments from the blocked person, or leaving them. I always leave them so that people can see why I blocked someone (so that I'm not accused of blocking anyone who disagrees with me).
Substack has been good so far in terms of not censoring. Although I disabled the option for donations b/c their $$ partner Stripe began withholding payments unless I provide "government issued ID".
Christine, I'm not surprised. You may want to check out this report, regarding STRIPE and "Carnage's" ties to it. All other Cdns should get informed as well. The tentacles are everywhere! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ey2BgX0R1iw
I would like to review STRIPE's particular written policies/reasons for unlawfully withholding payments from your Substack account to see if we can formulate an administrative remedy and settlement between you and STRIPE for your benefit.
Please feel free to consider emailing me the details (emails, texts, and policies) from STRIPE regarding STRIPE unlawfully withholding payments from your Substack account.
Again, don't shoot the messenger. This is what another Ai ChatGPT says, about your claims. No — the claims in that Substack are not true. They rely on a misunderstanding of how virology works and a misuse of Freedom-of-Information (FOI) responses. The conclusion that “H5N1 doesn’t exist” or that “no virus has ever been isolated” is scientifically incorrect.
Below is a clear breakdown of what’s going on.
1. Viruses (including H5N1) absolutely exist and are extensively documented
The H5N1 avian influenza virus has been studied for decades. Scientists have:
Isolated the virus
Sequenced its genome
Visualized it with electron microscopy
Infected cell cultures and animals experimentally
Tracked mutations and outbreaks globally
Examples of major research institutions documenting H5N1 include:
World Health Organization
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Canadian Food Inspection Agency
World Organisation for Animal Health
The genome of H5N1 is publicly available in international databases like GenBank and GISAID, with thousands of sequences submitted by labs worldwide.
2. The FOI argument she uses is misleading
Christine Massey’s argument depends on a common FOI trick.
She requests something extremely specific, for example:
“Provide records showing purification of a virus directly from a patient sample without cell culture.”
If an agency replies “we have no records matching that exact request”, she claims it proves the virus doesn’t exist.
But in reality:
FOI officers only search internal records of that specific agency
They do not search global scientific literature
Many agencies don’t store primary research papers
So “no records held by that agency” does NOT mean the research doesn’t exist.
It only means that agency doesn’t keep those files internally.
3. The claim that viruses are never isolated is false
Virus isolation is routine in virology.
Typical method:
Sample collected from infected animal/human
Virus particles separated and grown in cell culture
Virus identified using:
genetic sequencing
electron microscopy
antibody tests
Virus genome analyzed and published
This process is called virus isolation, even though conspiracy blogs claim it isn’t.
4. H5N1 has been physically imaged
Scientists have directly imaged influenza viruses using electron microscopy.
They show:
the envelope
the hemagglutinin spikes
the viral particles
This is basic virology taught in undergraduate biology.
5. H5N1 causes disease in controlled experiments
In laboratory studies:
Chickens, ferrets, and other animals infected with H5N1 develop characteristic disease.
The virus can then be recovered from the infected animals.
This fulfills modern infectious-disease standards (updated versions of Koch’s postulates).
6. The experts she cites are fringe figures
Many people cited in the Substack promote “terrain theory” or virus denial, including:
Stefan Lanka
Tom Cowan
Andrew Kaufman
Their claims are rejected by the mainstream scientific community because they conflict with massive experimental evidence.
7. Her claim that “no viral genome exists” is demonstrably wrong
The genome of H5N1 influenza has been sequenced thousands of times.
Example structure:
segmented RNA genome
~13,500 nucleotides
8 gene segments
These sequences are publicly available and used to track mutations and outbreaks globally.
8. Why these claims spread
Virus-denial arguments usually rely on:
misunderstanding of lab terminology
misinterpretation of FOI responses
distrust of institutions
cherry-picking fringe scientists
But the evidence base for viruses is enormous — spanning molecular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and microscopy.
✅ Bottom line
H5N1 definitely exists.
It has been isolated, sequenced, photographed, and experimentally studied.
The FOI claims in that Substack do not demonstrate the opposite.
They mainly show that FOI requests were written in a way that agencies couldn’t answer with their internal records.
Scott, some of us have higher standards than believing what "AI" tells us. "AI", as I would think you must know by now, is well-known to lie and repeat its lies over and over again even after admitting it was caught in a lie. And tons of people have backed AIs into a corner and had them admit there is no scientific evidence for any alleged virus. Then the "AI" simply reverts back to its lies in the next session. Rely on "AI" at your peril.
Your quote above says nothing that we've not heard a thousand times before.
#1 is simply a regurgitation of the unsubstantiated dogma.
#2 "If an agency replies “we have no records matching that exact request”, she claims it proves the virus doesn’t exist." - False, I have never made that claim. The FOIs show that the very institutions claiming expertise and knowledge have zero evidence on hand to demonstrate their claims. Every single institution out of 225 institutions in 40 different countries has failed when challenged. And we have challenged institutions on dozes of alleged viruses, not just SARS-COV-2.
The FOIs align with what is already know from the virology literature itself - that virologists to do adhere to basic logic or the scientific method and never have a valid independent variable to even study.
#3 "Sample collected from infected animal/human; Virus particles separated and grown in cell culture". Scott, this is exactly what my FOIs asked for - records of imagined viruses being found in bodily fluid/tissue and separated aka isolated/purified. There are no such records, and the CDC and other institutions explicitly confessed that this is NEVER done in virology. Hence virologists CANNOT have scientific evidence because they don't even have purified particles taken from their alleged locations to sequence, characterize and study with valid controlled experiments.
The fake "isolation" that is actually done by virologists does not identify any particle, far from it. We have been showing people what virologists actually do for the last 6 years, there is a mountain of easy-to-follow content for lay people. Please take advantage of it, because this is very time consuming for me to have to respond to your long "AI" pastings. Their "genomes" are nothing more than computer models and they simply point at particles in EM images and declare that they are viruses with zero valid evidence to demonstrate their claim. We call this the "point and declare method". It's as stupid as me pointing at you and insisting that you're a serial killer.
#4, 5 - see above.
#6 Why are you even wasting my time with an ad hominin logical fallacy?
#7 See above. Nothing more than computer models.
#8 There is no misunderstanding of lab terminology, or misinterpretation of FOI responses (at least on my part, although there is much misrepresentation of them by virus-pushers). Distrust of institutions exists for good reason and is not evidence of viruses lol. There is no cherry-picking going on. Go ahead and prove me wrong if you can by citing a valid scientific study, Scott. I will not waste more time responding to cut and paste from AI.
Christine, dismissing critiques as 'AI lies' or 'dogma' is an ad hominem deflection—it sidesteps the evidence rather than engaging it. My points come from peer-reviewed virology (e.g., H5N1 isolations in recent Emerging Infectious Diseases papers, full genomes in GenBank), not just AI output. Your FOIs use criteria that virology never claimed to meet (direct purification without culture), so 'no records' isn't proof of non-existence—it's a mismatch in definitions. If those thousands of studies fail your standards, cite why specifically (e.g., a flaw in a method section). Science invites scrutiny; happy to discuss any paper you name. Cheers...
Scott, you didn't cite a single study, you simple cut and pasted. And I did not simply dismiss "AI's" critique, I addressed it, as I and others have addressed the exact same critiques countless times over the last 6 years.
No kidding I used criteria that virologists do not use - that is the whole point and not a secret. According to logic and the scientific method, the imagined particle must actually be found and purified in order to show that it has the imagined "genome" and proteins and that it causes illness, etc. Yet that is never done. And no kidding there is a mismatch in definitions. Virologists have misled people through their absurd use of the word "isolation" when in fact they isolated nothing and instead mixed complex substances together to create an irrelevant and wildly unnatural concoction, as I already pointed out to you. And I switched to focusing on the word "purification" long ago, in order to avoid these waste-of-time conversations about the word "isolation". If you had been reading my FOIs, you'd know this.
Once again, I have never claimed that 'no records' is proof of non-existence, so it's unclear why you are insinuating again that that is my position. Maybe you are repeating "AI" arguments again.
Not sure why are you are asking me to cite specifically the problems when I already did that last night and have done that ad nauseum for the past 6 years. I've written, tweeted, posted on FB and done many interviews which are posted on my website near the bottom of the SARS-COV-2 FOIs page. Please go review before coming back here with comments and questions that have already been addressed over and over and over again.
Once again: I challenge you to cite a study that you believe shows the existence of a virus. The burden of proof is on those claiming that viruses do exist.
Don't kill the messenger. This is Grok's response to your entire substack.
No, there is no truth to Christine Massey's claims that "avian influenza virus" H5N1 (or any virus) does not exist.** Her Substack post and related FOI (Freedom of Information) responses represent a longstanding fringe interpretation promoted by "terrain theory" or virus-denial communities (including figures like Dr. Sam Bailey, Dr. Tom Cowan, Mike Stone at viroLIEgy, and Stefan Lanka). These claims misrepresent both the FOI results and the established methods of virology.
The FOI Responses Are Real—but Misinterpreted
Massey and collaborators have filed hundreds of narrowly worded FOI requests worldwide asking for records of "purification" (e.g., via filtration, ultracentrifugation, and chromatography) of any alleged virus directly from a diseased host's bodily fluids or tissue, without adding any other genetic material or using cell culture/eggs. Agencies like the CDC, PHAC (Public Health Agency of Canada), CFIA (Canadian Food Inspection Agency), USDA, FDA, and others routinely reply: "A search of our records failed to reveal any documents pertaining to your request."
This is exactly what she quotes (e.g., CDC responses from 2021 and 2022 for influenza and avian influenza). However:
- Virology does not isolate viruses the way bacteria are isolated (pure colonies on agar plates). Viruses are obligate intracellular parasites—they only replicate inside living host cells. The standard, validated process is:
1. Take a sample from a sick host.
2. Inoculate it onto susceptible cells (e.g., MDCK cells for flu) or embryonated chicken eggs.
3. Observe cytopathic effects (cell damage) or hemagglutination.
4. Purify virions from the culture supernatant via centrifugation/density gradients.
5. Confirm via electron microscopy, genetic sequencing, and animal challenge studies (Rivers' postulates for viruses, the adapted version of Koch's).
- Massey's requests explicitly **exclude** this process (no cell culture, no added material), so agencies correctly report "no records." This does **not** mean the virus is unproven or a hoax—it means her criteria are scientifically impossible and irrelevant to how virology actually works. The CDC has explicitly noted in similar contexts that the requested purification "is outside of what is possible in virology."
This tactic has been used for SARS-CoV-2, measles, HIV, monkeypox, and now H5N1. It does not "prove" virology is pseudoscience; it is a rhetorical loop. Mainstream rebuttals describe it as FOIA abuse with impossible demands.
Actual Scientific Evidence That H5N1 Exists
H5N1 (highly pathogenic avian influenza A) has been isolated, purified, sequenced, imaged, and shown to cause disease **thousands of times** since its first isolation in the 1990s. Here is a small sample of the peer-reviewed evidence (publicly available in databases like PubMed, GenBank, GISAID):
- Multiple studies document direct isolation of H5N1 from diseased birds, mammals, and humans, followed by full characterization (e.g., 2010 study isolating H5N1 from donkeys; 2019 Vietnam surveillance isolating multiple clades from poultry).
- Recent U.S. outbreaks (2024–2025 dairy cattle clade 2.3.4.4b): Virus isolated from milk, cats (via raw milk ingestion), and humans. Example: 2025 CDC/Emerging Infectious Diseases paper isolated infectious H5N1 from cat urine after raw-milk exposure; whole-genome sequencing matched farm strains.
- Inactivation, detection, and sequencing studies (2024–2025) confirm infectious virus in milk, urine, tissue, and even flies on affected farms; genomes deposited in NCBI/GenBank and GISAID (e.g., CDC sequenced human cases in 2024–2025 with full phylogenetic analysis matching cattle/poultry strains).
Public databases contain tens of thousands of H5N1 full-genome sequences from real samples. Outbreaks have killed millions of birds, affected dairy herds, caused rare but confirmed human cases (mild or severe), and triggered culling/quarantine—real events tracked by USDA, CDC, WHO, and CFIA. Animal challenge studies, electron microscopy of virions, and vaccine development (based on the same virus) all confirm pathogenicity and contagion in birds/mammals.
Why the "Hoax" Narrative Fails
- Contagion and tests: PCR, sequencing, and serology are validated against the isolated virus (not "circular"). Transmission is documented in labs and farms.
- No purified virus needed? Critics demand bacterial-style purity as the "gold standard," but that has never been virology's requirement. Controlled experiments (mock-infected vs. virus-infected cultures) and independent replication by labs worldwide meet scientific standards.
- Recommended resources in the post: These are all from the same small denialist circle (Cowan, Bailey, Yeadon, Rappoport, Lanka). Dr. Yeadon's claim that "birds cannot get colds or flu" is false—avian influenza is a well-documented bird disease. Lanka's measles "prize" was a legal technicality, not scientific disproof.
- Real-world consequences: Ignoring H5N1 has led to massive poultry losses and risks to livestock/farmers. The 2024–2025 U.S. dairy outbreak involved confirmed viral isolation and sequencing—not imagination.
Massey's FOIs and "affidavit" compile real bureaucratic replies to loaded questions, but they do not override the global body of virological evidence. Virology is a legitimate science; H5N1 is a real virus with real impacts. The "no virus exists" position is not supported by any mainstream scientific institution or peer-reviewed literature. Farmers or anyone facing testing should follow official veterinary/public-health guidance—there is no valid scientific basis for dismissing avian influenza as a hoax.
[The samples are often contaminated with "genetic" material and proteins before the virologists even get to step 2, by storing the samples in UTM/VTM aka universal/viral transport medium containing cow serum, chemicals, etc. Totally nonsensical, unscientific thing to do.
2. Inoculate it onto susceptible cells (e.g., MDCK cells for flu) or embryonated chicken eggs.
[Correct, they add the bodily fluid/tissue, NOT purified particles, to a cell line, typically monkey kidney cells or chicken eggs. They typically also add cow serum, a nutrient mix and antibiotics and antifungals. At this point you should already be able to see the idiocy of this "experiment", Scott. They are not using purified particles that they suspect of being a virus, so they CANNOT obtain evidence of a virus doing anything in these experiments. They haven't even shown that the claimed particles exist, yet they jump ahead to trying to demonstrate that the imagined viruses causes the cells to break down. Pure stupidity. Furthermore, they typically don't even bother with any fake controls, and they CANNOT have proper controls anyways because they don't even have the imagined particles. A proper control would mean doing the exact same thing to another set of cells, minus the virus... but they do not have the imagined virus, so they cannot do this. Furthermore, this procedure CANNOT tell you anything about what goes on in a living body. It's a contrived, totally unnatural and irrelevant lab concoction - bodily fluid mixed with a cell line (usually monkey cells) plus cow serum, drugs (often ones that are specifically toxic to the monkey kidney cells lol), etc. A complete waste of time that cannot demonstrate causation of any illness or even that the imagined virus causes the cells to break down. Furthermore, they typically reduce the nutrition to the cells to a fraction of what they normally get in order to say healthy.]
3. Observe cytopathic effects (cell damage) or hemagglutination.
[So they poisoned and starved the cell line, and if/when it breaks down after several days, they declare that the imagined virus did it and that it has been "isolated". This is the height of idiocy. Nothing has been isolated and nothing has been logically/scientifically demonstrated except that virologists are idiots and that starving/poisoning a cell line might cause it to break down.]
4. Purify virions from the culture supernatant via centrifugation/density gradients.
[Referring to "virions" here is reification fallacy. No virus has been demonstrated, far from it. And virologists very very rarely would purify particles from this irrelevant human/monkey/cow/bacteria/fungi concoction that they have created. And they have never gone on to actually sequence and characterize any potential virus from this concoction, or show that it causes any illness whatsoever. If you claim that they do, CITE A STUDY. And even if they did, which they never have, they would still not have shown that it was present in the bodily fluid/tissue. They have accomplished absolutely nothing of value. Anyone applying a modicum of logic and see that this is not scientific or logical and does not demonstrate the existence of a virus.]
No point in continuing...
If you actually want to learn instead of copying and pasting what "AI" tells you, there is tons of material for you here:
Apologies Christine Foi-lady, it takes a few minutes to do some research on your website and write a response, darlin....
Public note regarding Christine Massey’s latest posts about me.
I warned her to stop the ad hominem attacks… yet here we are again. Apparently being fact-checked or challenged isn’t something she handles well.
For context: Christine Massey does not hold recognized credentials in microbiology, yet regularly claims to be exposing “pseudoscience” in virology.
At the same time, she has circulated documents like the one attached where she declares she is a "living woman” and not a legal person, demands courts produce a “living flesh-and-blood woman named REGINA,” and even issues a "$100,000,000 per hour “fee schedule” to judges and government officials.
Yes… really.
This is straight out of the freeman-on-the-land / sovereign-citizen playbook, which courts have repeatedly rejected as nonsense.
The debate pattern is also predictable:
• File FOI requests using criteria no lab actually uses.
• Claim “no records” proves viruses don’t exist.
• Demand studies from critics.
• Immediately declare every study and lab method “pseudoscience.”
• Attack anyone who points out the problems.
That’s not scientific debate. That’s moving the goalposts while getting upset anyone noticed.
If your argument requires dismissing every piece of evidence in advance and attacking anyone who questions you… that’s not science. That’s just a belief system.
Awwweee....you sound so "offended", did your feelings get hurt, honey?
Christine keeps insisting I’ve made “virus claims.” I haven’t. She keeps repeating it anyway so she has something to argue with. That alone should tell people a lot about how this “debate” works. Its kinda like Covid messaging....repeat, repeat, repeat...
But let’s use Christine’s 'own words'.
She says she is a “living woman and not a legal fiction.”
She demands courts produce a “living flesh-and-blood woman named REGINA.”
She issues a $100,000,000 per hour fee schedule to judges and officials.
Yes… those are her claims to a fucking court, no less. 🤣🤣🤣
Meanwhile, Christine Massey does not hold recognized credentials in microbiology, yet insists the entire field of virology is fake and that thousands of scientists and labs around the world are all somehow part of the same illusion. 😎😎
Her method is simple: demand studies, pre-declare every possible method “pseudoscience,” ignore responses, then accuse critics of not providing evidence.
That’s not science. That’s a belief system with moving goalposts.
At this point I’m genuinely curious how far this rabbit hole goes. Flat Earth next? Moon landing hoax? Something even wilder? 🤣🤣
Either way, since she keeps bringing my name up, I’ll keep doing the same thing: posting her claims in her own words so people can decide for themselves.
Keep the comedy coming, Christine ....we are going to make you famous !!
Yes Scott, I am a living woman and not a legal fiction. Interesting how you found time to go rummaging through my website for documents on an entirely different topic instead of citing studies to back up your virus claims.
Virology labs do not adhere to logic/the scientific method, and my FOIs are for records that do adhere logic/the scientific method. Collecting hundreds of official legal confessions has helped many people around the world realize that we've been lied to all our lives and that there is no science to follow when it comes to imagined viruses. Why you are having such a hard time with this, I have no idea.
You have not been discussing the methodologies of virologists at all, beyond pasting AI content that lists methods that sound reasonable at a glance (i.e. "sequencing"). Those of us familiar with the literature know what "sequencing" really means in virology (construction of computer models based on thousands/millions of smaller sequences allegedly found in monkey/cow/human/bacteria/fungi mixtures, not shown to come from particles known to be viruses or from any particular particle at all, ASSEMBLED into sequences absurdly declared to be "viral genomes") You haven't responded to the problems that I've pointed out regarding those fake "genomes" or the point-and-declare EM images (which have further problems that I didn't mention to you yet), or even the ridiculous cell cultures. And you still haven't cited (with an actual title, authors, etc.) even 1 study that you think shows the existence of a virus. If you pick a study that includes animal experiments, I will then explain to you the fatal flaws in those studies as well, as I have already done in my newsletters and interviews and in discussions on social media, countless times already. You won't be able to find a study that used a valid independent variable (purified particles) and had necessary controls and used a valid exposure route...
And fyi, I have never posted about you Scott. I have simply commented under your posts. You on the other hand felt the need to post about me for some reason.
The virus model is worn out— thank you for your words. I wrote a playful article called “the most contagious and deadly virus known to humans.” I think it would be right up your alley!
I just read how many times you had to rephrase your request so the stupid people at CFIA could get your answer. thanks for being persistent. now we have to get the judge to recognize how illogical it is to kill an entire herd of 400 ostriches just because two got sick and died in WINTER.
What if the two ostriches were poisoned (accidentally or deliberately)?
Were autopsies performed, or mere PCR TESTS?
Chances are there are no surveillance cameras on the ostrich farm to help with these questions.
As for the Judge coming to the rescue...
In today's "2020-2025 GENOCIDAL COnVID PLANNEDemic" era, chances are even the judiciary can be compromised the same as the hospitals were financially incentivized to commit GENOCIDE and the same as Pediatricians being financially incentivized to commit GENOCIDE against the innocent children of the world since the inception of the childhood vaccine schedule.
Unfortunately the farmers are being taken for a ride (in my personal opinion) by a legal team that prefers to turn a blind eye to these official legal confessions, the glaring problems with virology and my notarized affidavit, and that argued for quackcines as an alternative to culling (they even wrote that this is an opportunity to quackcinate). They are going along with the false/fraudulent narrative instead of challenging it, and legitimizing CFIA's fake-authority. From what I've seen they don't even advise the farmers to prohibit the CFIA actors from coming on their property without a court order.
Unfortunately, you are correct about the Judge not helping the ostrich farmer "sua sponte" (on his own accord or volition).
Those who do not know they have rights, cannot exercise such rights...
Ultimately, it is up to the ostrich farmer (not the Judge) to exercise the ostrich farmer's property rights, titles, and interests vested in the ostriches for their own personal and private best interest (The ostriches are NOT a public interest matter until "proven" under verified solemn oath to be a public interest matter - see next paragraph).
If I were the ostrich farmer...
I would conditionally accept the public health agencies' offer to care for, to feed, to water, to examine, to house, to quarantine, to study, to test, to transport, to vaccinate, and/or to exterminate the ostriches under the condition that both the public health agencies and the participating court provide verified proof (signed under sworn oath and penalty of perjury and a penal sum of $100 million Canadian dollars Surety Bond per each ostrich) verifying the existence of the H5N1 Bird Flu Virus specifically per the specifications and terms stipulated in Christine Massey's FOIs. Otherwise, should both the public health agencies and the participating court fail to provide such verified proof, then both the public health agencies and the participating court and other associated parties of interest in the ostrich matter are welcome to care for, to feed, to water, to examine, to house, to quarantine, to study, to test, to transport, to vaccinate, and/or to exterminate the ostriches at the stipulated property use fee rate of $100 million Canadian dollars per each ostrich, per each associated several user of interest, per each use, per each day.
It's all germ theory vs terrain theory all over again, like germ theory was never empirically proven to be complete BS. And same with this zoonotic BS.... People would not be falling for this in the "age of information" if they would ask questions and use their devices to explore the way the world works, and not just allow themselves to be distracted by useless entertainment and forced fed fearful, sensationalist "news" that keeps them in their root chakra and purely animal instincts their whole lives. This is where people who consider themselves to be made in God's image over Darwin's find themselves to be the smartest and strongest of all the human race. The life of a shepherd ain't easy.
I found you on the Citizens Oversight, Save the Ostriches video on YouTube. You've provided the most valuable information that strikes straight to the heart of the matter and hopefully will arm Katie and her family with the ammo that they've needed to fight back against this murderous campaign. Thank you, Christine, you are a true champion and shepherd amongst a flock of lost and mislead sheep.
Thank you Natica. It's been frustrating that this information has been available for literally years now (well, at least the SARS-COV-2 FOIs and tons of material exposing virology from many other people), and very few 'health freedom' people are willing to put it to use. Hopefully more will as we go forward.
Re: Citizens Oversight’s video “LIVE: Save the Ostriches - Fighting Back Against a Heartbreaking Order”.
Thank you, @naticasoychuk, for mentioning the "Citizens Oversight’s YouTube video" regarding saving the ostriches.
You did a great job, Christine, presenting in the video and laying down the solid foundation of the irrefutable truth that VIRUSES do NOT exist in nature.
At video time-stamp 01:17:02…
Stephen Pelech, (Ph.D. Professor at the University of British Columbia Department of Medicine doing immunology research for over 40 years studying cancer proteins and Biochemist and President of Kinexus Bioinformatics Corporation.) accuses you (Christine Massey) of being wrong for claiming that “VIRUSES” do not exist.
It would also be interesting to determine not only the market value of Stephen Pelech’s personal assets but also the market value of Stephen Pelech’s business known as the “Kinexus Bioinformatics Corporation”.
Now imagine, rather than you (Christine Massey) “challenging” Stephen Pelech’s offer to prove the existence of “VIRUSES”, you instead “conditionally accepted” Stephen Pelech’s offer to prove his assertion alleging the existence of “VIRUSES” in such a way that his proof is based upon the condition that if Stephen Pelech fails to prove the existence of “VIRUSES” per the terms stipulated by your VIRUS ISOLATE FOI REQUEST FORM that UBC’s Endowment funds and Stephen Pelech’s personal assets and the Kinexus Bioinformatics Corporation’s assets are attached to a new Private Foundation Trust Fund to help finance the necessary therapies, treatments, and living expenses required by the vaXXine-injured persons who became injured by vaXXines manufactured based on the FALSE and FRAUDULENT “VIROLOGY THEORIES” promoted over the past 40 years by the UBC and the Kinexus Bioinformatics Corporation under Stephen Pelech's tenure.
Only God knows how many innumerable vaXXine-injured persons could benefit from reallocating the market value of those UBC Endowment funds, Stephen Pelech’s personal assets, and Kinexus Bioinformatics Corporation’s assets for the benefit of the vaXXine-injured population.
If the Spanish Flu is nonsense, then what killed all those people? They had very real symptoms and how did they contract it? That was way before the time of Fauci and Trump.
Do you mean books that specifically discuss the FOIs, or books exposing the germ narratives more generally? If you mean specific re the FOIs, Mark Gober discussed them in his book An End to Upside Down Medicine. Also James McCumiskey's book Overcoming the Germ Theory Medical Myth. Also I believe they were mentioned in an Italian book by Stefano Scoglio. Those are the ones I can think of off-hand.
Re germ narratives more generally, there are numerous. For example Virus Mania (by Torsten Engelbrecht, etc), What Really Makes You Ill (Lester and Parker), Contagion Myth (Tom Cowan), Can You Catch A Cold (Roytas)... there are others.
It has become clear to me that all "diseases" are not what they say they are. In fact, diseases (as described) are not really a thing. Pfizer's list of c. 1250 adverse reactions in the animal trials for c19 vaccine kinda tells us that. The injection can pretty much cause anything, depending on where it gets to in the body and how an individual reacts.
This girl is a danger to tptb, the satanic elite, reptilian cowards and the official narrative. I love you Christine and thank you for all the work you've put in since the plandemic began. I used to follow you on Twitter in 2020 until my account got suspended, the last of my worries. Al I said was "I'll inhale any virus any day" and "5g Millimeter wave pulsed signals are far more dangerous than normal sine waves. 20,000 AT&T new base stations went live today. More "coronaviruses" coming soon." That did it. Lol.
I always take screen shots of your work to educate the sheeple. I have backups on Google drive too. Nowadays, bird, pig, sars, hiv, Spanish, Russian, mers and ANY virus the msm propaganda speak of is "TO BE COMPLETELY IGNORED". Just like global warming/climate change Except, the evidence of such claims. I WILL be looking for evidence before I listen to the "experts" or, more likely, I won't participate in any of their experiments.
Viruses, not real. Electric Fields, chemtrails, glyphosate, Real and they're destroying our planet so much everyday, but tptb only focus on non existent climate change.
Again, thank you so much and God bless and protect you.
You are one of the last few remaining, and I haven't been getting notifications about your publications. I am going to catch up now... Just love ya'. :)
In recent times, despite leading respiratory therapeutics research in Pfizer for many years, I had a big shock.
When I repeat what I discovered, most people don’t believe it. I’m not asking you to believe me. It’s not my observations.
It is that acute respiratory illnesses that we call colds and ‘flu (more correctly, influenza-like illnesses or ILI) are NOT contagious.
There is more than a century of failure in the peer reviewed literature to show that a person, sick with one of these illnesses, can give it to another person who was well.
Many clinical studies placed a person with acute respiratory illness in proximity to a person without such symptoms for hours. The potential recipient was followed up for days to weeks.
The frequency with which they went on to develop similar symptoms was the same as in those who weren’t exposed to a sick person.
That’s a shock to most people, too. But there it is. Those are the consistent findings.
My conclusions are that acute respiratory illnesses we call colds & ‘flu are not contagious.
In turn, that means they are not caused by submicroscopic, infectious particles commonly named “respiratory viruses”.
No, I don’t know what causes colds and ‘flu. No, I don’t have an obligation to provide an alternative explanation. We don’t know what “causes” most diseases. I have some ideas, though they are not necessary in order to disabuse yourself of the false notion that “colds & ‘flu are caused by respiratory viruses”. A century of empirical evidence tells us they’re not.
I have lately been curious if anyone has tried to quantify their experiences of "contagion." By this I mean, we all have observed many cases of one person in a household getting some sickness, then someone else in the household gets the same or very similar symptoms, then another. We've been taught the theory of germs and contagion, so we look at such a situation and it confirms our belief that the second person caught the illness from the first, and the third from the first and/or the second.
BUT we all have ALSO observed many instances of one person in a household getting sick with a common illness (e.g., cold, flu, rash illness, etc.) and NO ONE else in that household "catches" it. Yet, because we believe that those illnesses are "contagious," we basically ignore those cases as irrelevant exceptions to the "rule."
I would love to see if anyone has ever attempted to quantify how many of the first situation occur vs. the second, in some kind of systematic observational study. In 2020 I collected stories of some often heart-wrenching "cases of covid," especially where young people died "from covid," or in one case a 4-y-o boy was hospitalized, and his mother stayed with him because if she left she would not have been allowed to return. In EVERY case there were people in the household who did not get sick and if they tested, were not "positive" for covid. In the 4-year-old's case, which I got from FaceBook, the mom is shown cuddling the boy, kissing him, not a shred of PPE between them. Neither she nor others in the family "caught" covid nor tested positive.
My hypothesis: people "catching" illnesses from those near them is a bias confirmation, not a demonstrable phenomenon. I'd love to have a way to test that hypothesis!
I'm planning on that, as soon as it's available from Lulu, or other non-Amazon source. Really looking forward to it; I've listened to/watched several interviews with him.
I'd be interested as to what your ideas to what causes colds and flu are Mike.
I had pneumonia in Sept 2019, which was almost certainly due to the cold weather. I was out in the evening with just a shirt and unpadded jacket on. The weather had suddenly changed from mild to winter cold and I started to come down with it as soon as I got home that evening.
I also was ill from breathing in the "Sahara Sands" in the summer of 2022, I went out in the evening to the shop when it was raining and started feeling ill as soon as I got home. It didn't feel like a regular "flu", but like i'd been breathing in some noxious substance - I could hardly breath. The following morning everything was covered with the yellow dust, which I suspect had been brought down in the rain the night before.
"Public health" and food inspection actors in Canada will be gearing up their H5N1 hoax this week.
They have been fraudulently testing lactating cows for the imaginary "H5N1" (with a test that couldn't confirm the presence of a "virus" even if it had been shown to exist) and expect to start releasing the results and revving up the propaganda.
Video of a May 9th roundtable discussion featuring Theresa Tam, Bonnie Henry, Kieran Moore, etc:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/tXR0doLB6DJo/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ob0xqGC125U
Bizarrely, Theresa Tam invited me - presumably by accident - to the round table discussion with pseudoscientists and medical officers, etc from PHAC and Ontario, BC and Quebec. I got to sit in with no one questioning who I was or why I was there - lol.
Email invitations:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/emails-re-public-health-prepping-for-H5N1-hoax-2024-05-07.pdf
@christinemasseyfois1,
Please keep your wits about you when attending conferences and taking air flights where beverages and foods are served to persons individually (not buffet style).
Let's not forget that Dr. Rashid Buttar was poisoned.
Such incidences do not happen by accident when the Globalists have their blacklisted targets... as is the case where STRIPE targeted your Substack account.
Wow, I just watched that whole conference call and not one empirically scientific statement or piece of information shared on anyone's behalf. All of them happily speaking speculative rhetoric in order to take home a healthy paycheck and to feel like they're so fucking important. They're all quite literally sociopaths.
thanks for saving me the time and certain irritation!!
Looks like it is Hoax time in the good old USA.
https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/06/health/bird-flu-death-louisiana/index.html
They don't see you but they see 'viruses' everywhere. LOL...
I have finally blocked Tomas Hull because life is too short for his continual inane, disingenuous comments - which I have left visible.
Christine thank you for your work and for notifying that you blocked someone. But blocking is a total no-no to truth seekers.
Christine I admire your work but I must object to your blocking anyone. Blocking is censoring. Do you like to be censored? I'm sure you don't. But when you do something to others that you don't like, it means you are not using the Golden Rule which is do unto others. But it has serious consequences - it shows you consent to censorship and therefore censorship will continue to run amok. What goes around comes around. Please reinstate him. Don't spend any time on him, just scroll by but shutting down someone's voice is a superior attitude, the attitude that has us in this mess we're in. Please don't block me for objecting, simply respond or don't respond. I hope you understand the seriousness of censorship. If you do it, it means you consent to it. That is how it is read by dark forces. We must not be like them, we must be of light.
It's no coincidence that many bird deaths are occurring where cell towers are popping up. Influenza is an electromagnetic illness, and always has been, even before cell towers:
https://romanshapoval.substack.com/p/why-influenza-is-an-electrical-illness
Thank you for your work Christine!
It’s ironic that some accounts force a person to block, yet others can still read their comments.
I say that, having been essentially deleted almost everywhere. I’m still uncensored on Telegram https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel
Please be aware of fake Telegram channels using my name and photograph. Only the genuine channel has a short video of me spelling out the name of the genuine channel.
I have begun to use Substack https://open.substack.com/pub/drmikeyeadon/p/my-letter-to-pc-ben-bates
On most other platforms online, I am not tolerated in my own name. It’s been like this for well over three years.
Yay for free speech.
And thank you, Christine, for your persistent courtesy in stating truths.
Best wishes
Mike
Mike I can't express how much I admire what you do. You really stick your neck out. Thank you so much. But why are you not censuring Christine for blocking? Why must people block? It truly bothers me no end, because it gives the oligarchs more ammunition when we do it. We must always be on the side of free expression and even make it contemptible to censor. There are practically no cases to do it, at least not unilaterally. This subject gets little attention but we really need to talk about it because it is crucial for our progress. We need to stand together when we see it happen, that's another way we will keep ourselves strong. I love Christine's work too but if one truly cares about truth and freedom, we must create a front that absolutely abhors censorship. Best regards Mike.
Hi Dr. Yeadon. Substack gives the blocker the choice of automatically deleting all the comments from the blocked person, or leaving them. I always leave them so that people can see why I blocked someone (so that I'm not accused of blocking anyone who disagrees with me).
Substack has been good so far in terms of not censoring. Although I disabled the option for donations b/c their $$ partner Stripe began withholding payments unless I provide "government issued ID".
Christine, I'm not surprised. You may want to check out this report, regarding STRIPE and "Carnage's" ties to it. All other Cdns should get informed as well. The tentacles are everywhere! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ey2BgX0R1iw
Hi Christine,
Re: Unlawful Digital Financial Bullying by STRIPE
I would like to review STRIPE's particular written policies/reasons for unlawfully withholding payments from your Substack account to see if we can formulate an administrative remedy and settlement between you and STRIPE for your benefit.
Please feel free to consider emailing me the details (emails, texts, and policies) from STRIPE regarding STRIPE unlawfully withholding payments from your Substack account.
Thank you,
Jo Ro
rojokjv316@gmail.com
Ps:
Much appreciation and gratitude for your ISOLATE FOIs endeavors.
2025 0410 at 2:04 AM PST
Thank you, Christine. That’s helpful to know.
Again, don't shoot the messenger. This is what another Ai ChatGPT says, about your claims. No — the claims in that Substack are not true. They rely on a misunderstanding of how virology works and a misuse of Freedom-of-Information (FOI) responses. The conclusion that “H5N1 doesn’t exist” or that “no virus has ever been isolated” is scientifically incorrect.
Below is a clear breakdown of what’s going on.
1. Viruses (including H5N1) absolutely exist and are extensively documented
The H5N1 avian influenza virus has been studied for decades. Scientists have:
Isolated the virus
Sequenced its genome
Visualized it with electron microscopy
Infected cell cultures and animals experimentally
Tracked mutations and outbreaks globally
Examples of major research institutions documenting H5N1 include:
World Health Organization
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Canadian Food Inspection Agency
World Organisation for Animal Health
The genome of H5N1 is publicly available in international databases like GenBank and GISAID, with thousands of sequences submitted by labs worldwide.
2. The FOI argument she uses is misleading
Christine Massey’s argument depends on a common FOI trick.
She requests something extremely specific, for example:
“Provide records showing purification of a virus directly from a patient sample without cell culture.”
If an agency replies “we have no records matching that exact request”, she claims it proves the virus doesn’t exist.
But in reality:
FOI officers only search internal records of that specific agency
They do not search global scientific literature
Many agencies don’t store primary research papers
So “no records held by that agency” does NOT mean the research doesn’t exist.
It only means that agency doesn’t keep those files internally.
3. The claim that viruses are never isolated is false
Virus isolation is routine in virology.
Typical method:
Sample collected from infected animal/human
Virus particles separated and grown in cell culture
Virus identified using:
genetic sequencing
electron microscopy
antibody tests
Virus genome analyzed and published
This process is called virus isolation, even though conspiracy blogs claim it isn’t.
4. H5N1 has been physically imaged
Scientists have directly imaged influenza viruses using electron microscopy.
They show:
the envelope
the hemagglutinin spikes
the viral particles
This is basic virology taught in undergraduate biology.
5. H5N1 causes disease in controlled experiments
In laboratory studies:
Chickens, ferrets, and other animals infected with H5N1 develop characteristic disease.
The virus can then be recovered from the infected animals.
This fulfills modern infectious-disease standards (updated versions of Koch’s postulates).
6. The experts she cites are fringe figures
Many people cited in the Substack promote “terrain theory” or virus denial, including:
Stefan Lanka
Tom Cowan
Andrew Kaufman
Their claims are rejected by the mainstream scientific community because they conflict with massive experimental evidence.
7. Her claim that “no viral genome exists” is demonstrably wrong
The genome of H5N1 influenza has been sequenced thousands of times.
Example structure:
segmented RNA genome
~13,500 nucleotides
8 gene segments
These sequences are publicly available and used to track mutations and outbreaks globally.
8. Why these claims spread
Virus-denial arguments usually rely on:
misunderstanding of lab terminology
misinterpretation of FOI responses
distrust of institutions
cherry-picking fringe scientists
But the evidence base for viruses is enormous — spanning molecular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and microscopy.
✅ Bottom line
H5N1 definitely exists.
It has been isolated, sequenced, photographed, and experimentally studied.
The FOI claims in that Substack do not demonstrate the opposite.
They mainly show that FOI requests were written in a way that agencies couldn’t answer with their internal records.
Scott, some of us have higher standards than believing what "AI" tells us. "AI", as I would think you must know by now, is well-known to lie and repeat its lies over and over again even after admitting it was caught in a lie. And tons of people have backed AIs into a corner and had them admit there is no scientific evidence for any alleged virus. Then the "AI" simply reverts back to its lies in the next session. Rely on "AI" at your peril.
Your quote above says nothing that we've not heard a thousand times before.
#1 is simply a regurgitation of the unsubstantiated dogma.
#2 "If an agency replies “we have no records matching that exact request”, she claims it proves the virus doesn’t exist." - False, I have never made that claim. The FOIs show that the very institutions claiming expertise and knowledge have zero evidence on hand to demonstrate their claims. Every single institution out of 225 institutions in 40 different countries has failed when challenged. And we have challenged institutions on dozes of alleged viruses, not just SARS-COV-2.
The FOIs align with what is already know from the virology literature itself - that virologists to do adhere to basic logic or the scientific method and never have a valid independent variable to even study.
#3 "Sample collected from infected animal/human; Virus particles separated and grown in cell culture". Scott, this is exactly what my FOIs asked for - records of imagined viruses being found in bodily fluid/tissue and separated aka isolated/purified. There are no such records, and the CDC and other institutions explicitly confessed that this is NEVER done in virology. Hence virologists CANNOT have scientific evidence because they don't even have purified particles taken from their alleged locations to sequence, characterize and study with valid controlled experiments.
The fake "isolation" that is actually done by virologists does not identify any particle, far from it. We have been showing people what virologists actually do for the last 6 years, there is a mountain of easy-to-follow content for lay people. Please take advantage of it, because this is very time consuming for me to have to respond to your long "AI" pastings. Their "genomes" are nothing more than computer models and they simply point at particles in EM images and declare that they are viruses with zero valid evidence to demonstrate their claim. We call this the "point and declare method". It's as stupid as me pointing at you and insisting that you're a serial killer.
#4, 5 - see above.
#6 Why are you even wasting my time with an ad hominin logical fallacy?
#7 See above. Nothing more than computer models.
#8 There is no misunderstanding of lab terminology, or misinterpretation of FOI responses (at least on my part, although there is much misrepresentation of them by virus-pushers). Distrust of institutions exists for good reason and is not evidence of viruses lol. There is no cherry-picking going on. Go ahead and prove me wrong if you can by citing a valid scientific study, Scott. I will not waste more time responding to cut and paste from AI.
Christine, dismissing critiques as 'AI lies' or 'dogma' is an ad hominem deflection—it sidesteps the evidence rather than engaging it. My points come from peer-reviewed virology (e.g., H5N1 isolations in recent Emerging Infectious Diseases papers, full genomes in GenBank), not just AI output. Your FOIs use criteria that virology never claimed to meet (direct purification without culture), so 'no records' isn't proof of non-existence—it's a mismatch in definitions. If those thousands of studies fail your standards, cite why specifically (e.g., a flaw in a method section). Science invites scrutiny; happy to discuss any paper you name. Cheers...
Scott, you didn't cite a single study, you simple cut and pasted. And I did not simply dismiss "AI's" critique, I addressed it, as I and others have addressed the exact same critiques countless times over the last 6 years.
No kidding I used criteria that virologists do not use - that is the whole point and not a secret. According to logic and the scientific method, the imagined particle must actually be found and purified in order to show that it has the imagined "genome" and proteins and that it causes illness, etc. Yet that is never done. And no kidding there is a mismatch in definitions. Virologists have misled people through their absurd use of the word "isolation" when in fact they isolated nothing and instead mixed complex substances together to create an irrelevant and wildly unnatural concoction, as I already pointed out to you. And I switched to focusing on the word "purification" long ago, in order to avoid these waste-of-time conversations about the word "isolation". If you had been reading my FOIs, you'd know this.
Once again, I have never claimed that 'no records' is proof of non-existence, so it's unclear why you are insinuating again that that is my position. Maybe you are repeating "AI" arguments again.
Not sure why are you are asking me to cite specifically the problems when I already did that last night and have done that ad nauseum for the past 6 years. I've written, tweeted, posted on FB and done many interviews which are posted on my website near the bottom of the SARS-COV-2 FOIs page. Please go review before coming back here with comments and questions that have already been addressed over and over and over again.
Once again: I challenge you to cite a study that you believe shows the existence of a virus. The burden of proof is on those claiming that viruses do exist.
Don't kill the messenger. This is Grok's response to your entire substack.
No, there is no truth to Christine Massey's claims that "avian influenza virus" H5N1 (or any virus) does not exist.** Her Substack post and related FOI (Freedom of Information) responses represent a longstanding fringe interpretation promoted by "terrain theory" or virus-denial communities (including figures like Dr. Sam Bailey, Dr. Tom Cowan, Mike Stone at viroLIEgy, and Stefan Lanka). These claims misrepresent both the FOI results and the established methods of virology.
The FOI Responses Are Real—but Misinterpreted
Massey and collaborators have filed hundreds of narrowly worded FOI requests worldwide asking for records of "purification" (e.g., via filtration, ultracentrifugation, and chromatography) of any alleged virus directly from a diseased host's bodily fluids or tissue, without adding any other genetic material or using cell culture/eggs. Agencies like the CDC, PHAC (Public Health Agency of Canada), CFIA (Canadian Food Inspection Agency), USDA, FDA, and others routinely reply: "A search of our records failed to reveal any documents pertaining to your request."
This is exactly what she quotes (e.g., CDC responses from 2021 and 2022 for influenza and avian influenza). However:
- Virology does not isolate viruses the way bacteria are isolated (pure colonies on agar plates). Viruses are obligate intracellular parasites—they only replicate inside living host cells. The standard, validated process is:
1. Take a sample from a sick host.
2. Inoculate it onto susceptible cells (e.g., MDCK cells for flu) or embryonated chicken eggs.
3. Observe cytopathic effects (cell damage) or hemagglutination.
4. Purify virions from the culture supernatant via centrifugation/density gradients.
5. Confirm via electron microscopy, genetic sequencing, and animal challenge studies (Rivers' postulates for viruses, the adapted version of Koch's).
- Massey's requests explicitly **exclude** this process (no cell culture, no added material), so agencies correctly report "no records." This does **not** mean the virus is unproven or a hoax—it means her criteria are scientifically impossible and irrelevant to how virology actually works. The CDC has explicitly noted in similar contexts that the requested purification "is outside of what is possible in virology."
This tactic has been used for SARS-CoV-2, measles, HIV, monkeypox, and now H5N1. It does not "prove" virology is pseudoscience; it is a rhetorical loop. Mainstream rebuttals describe it as FOIA abuse with impossible demands.
Actual Scientific Evidence That H5N1 Exists
H5N1 (highly pathogenic avian influenza A) has been isolated, purified, sequenced, imaged, and shown to cause disease **thousands of times** since its first isolation in the 1990s. Here is a small sample of the peer-reviewed evidence (publicly available in databases like PubMed, GenBank, GISAID):
- Multiple studies document direct isolation of H5N1 from diseased birds, mammals, and humans, followed by full characterization (e.g., 2010 study isolating H5N1 from donkeys; 2019 Vietnam surveillance isolating multiple clades from poultry).
- Recent U.S. outbreaks (2024–2025 dairy cattle clade 2.3.4.4b): Virus isolated from milk, cats (via raw milk ingestion), and humans. Example: 2025 CDC/Emerging Infectious Diseases paper isolated infectious H5N1 from cat urine after raw-milk exposure; whole-genome sequencing matched farm strains.
- Inactivation, detection, and sequencing studies (2024–2025) confirm infectious virus in milk, urine, tissue, and even flies on affected farms; genomes deposited in NCBI/GenBank and GISAID (e.g., CDC sequenced human cases in 2024–2025 with full phylogenetic analysis matching cattle/poultry strains).
Public databases contain tens of thousands of H5N1 full-genome sequences from real samples. Outbreaks have killed millions of birds, affected dairy herds, caused rare but confirmed human cases (mild or severe), and triggered culling/quarantine—real events tracked by USDA, CDC, WHO, and CFIA. Animal challenge studies, electron microscopy of virions, and vaccine development (based on the same virus) all confirm pathogenicity and contagion in birds/mammals.
Why the "Hoax" Narrative Fails
- Contagion and tests: PCR, sequencing, and serology are validated against the isolated virus (not "circular"). Transmission is documented in labs and farms.
- No purified virus needed? Critics demand bacterial-style purity as the "gold standard," but that has never been virology's requirement. Controlled experiments (mock-infected vs. virus-infected cultures) and independent replication by labs worldwide meet scientific standards.
- Recommended resources in the post: These are all from the same small denialist circle (Cowan, Bailey, Yeadon, Rappoport, Lanka). Dr. Yeadon's claim that "birds cannot get colds or flu" is false—avian influenza is a well-documented bird disease. Lanka's measles "prize" was a legal technicality, not scientific disproof.
- Real-world consequences: Ignoring H5N1 has led to massive poultry losses and risks to livestock/farmers. The 2024–2025 U.S. dairy outbreak involved confirmed viral isolation and sequencing—not imagination.
Massey's FOIs and "affidavit" compile real bureaucratic replies to loaded questions, but they do not override the global body of virological evidence. Virology is a legitimate science; H5N1 is a real virus with real impacts. The "no virus exists" position is not supported by any mainstream scientific institution or peer-reviewed literature. Farmers or anyone facing testing should follow official veterinary/public-health guidance—there is no valid scientific basis for dismissing avian influenza as a hoax.
Briefly... see my notes in brackets.
1. Take a sample from a sick host.
[The samples are often contaminated with "genetic" material and proteins before the virologists even get to step 2, by storing the samples in UTM/VTM aka universal/viral transport medium containing cow serum, chemicals, etc. Totally nonsensical, unscientific thing to do.
2. Inoculate it onto susceptible cells (e.g., MDCK cells for flu) or embryonated chicken eggs.
[Correct, they add the bodily fluid/tissue, NOT purified particles, to a cell line, typically monkey kidney cells or chicken eggs. They typically also add cow serum, a nutrient mix and antibiotics and antifungals. At this point you should already be able to see the idiocy of this "experiment", Scott. They are not using purified particles that they suspect of being a virus, so they CANNOT obtain evidence of a virus doing anything in these experiments. They haven't even shown that the claimed particles exist, yet they jump ahead to trying to demonstrate that the imagined viruses causes the cells to break down. Pure stupidity. Furthermore, they typically don't even bother with any fake controls, and they CANNOT have proper controls anyways because they don't even have the imagined particles. A proper control would mean doing the exact same thing to another set of cells, minus the virus... but they do not have the imagined virus, so they cannot do this. Furthermore, this procedure CANNOT tell you anything about what goes on in a living body. It's a contrived, totally unnatural and irrelevant lab concoction - bodily fluid mixed with a cell line (usually monkey cells) plus cow serum, drugs (often ones that are specifically toxic to the monkey kidney cells lol), etc. A complete waste of time that cannot demonstrate causation of any illness or even that the imagined virus causes the cells to break down. Furthermore, they typically reduce the nutrition to the cells to a fraction of what they normally get in order to say healthy.]
3. Observe cytopathic effects (cell damage) or hemagglutination.
[So they poisoned and starved the cell line, and if/when it breaks down after several days, they declare that the imagined virus did it and that it has been "isolated". This is the height of idiocy. Nothing has been isolated and nothing has been logically/scientifically demonstrated except that virologists are idiots and that starving/poisoning a cell line might cause it to break down.]
4. Purify virions from the culture supernatant via centrifugation/density gradients.
[Referring to "virions" here is reification fallacy. No virus has been demonstrated, far from it. And virologists very very rarely would purify particles from this irrelevant human/monkey/cow/bacteria/fungi concoction that they have created. And they have never gone on to actually sequence and characterize any potential virus from this concoction, or show that it causes any illness whatsoever. If you claim that they do, CITE A STUDY. And even if they did, which they never have, they would still not have shown that it was present in the bodily fluid/tissue. They have accomplished absolutely nothing of value. Anyone applying a modicum of logic and see that this is not scientific or logical and does not demonstrate the existence of a virus.]
No point in continuing...
If you actually want to learn instead of copying and pasting what "AI" tells you, there is tons of material for you here:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/what-the-hell-is-going-on/
Apologies Christine Foi-lady, it takes a few minutes to do some research on your website and write a response, darlin....
Public note regarding Christine Massey’s latest posts about me.
I warned her to stop the ad hominem attacks… yet here we are again. Apparently being fact-checked or challenged isn’t something she handles well.
For context: Christine Massey does not hold recognized credentials in microbiology, yet regularly claims to be exposing “pseudoscience” in virology.
At the same time, she has circulated documents like the one attached where she declares she is a "living woman” and not a legal person, demands courts produce a “living flesh-and-blood woman named REGINA,” and even issues a "$100,000,000 per hour “fee schedule” to judges and government officials.
Yes… really.
This is straight out of the freeman-on-the-land / sovereign-citizen playbook, which courts have repeatedly rejected as nonsense.
The debate pattern is also predictable:
• File FOI requests using criteria no lab actually uses.
• Claim “no records” proves viruses don’t exist.
• Demand studies from critics.
• Immediately declare every study and lab method “pseudoscience.”
• Attack anyone who points out the problems.
That’s not scientific debate. That’s moving the goalposts while getting upset anyone noticed.
If your argument requires dismissing every piece of evidence in advance and attacking anyone who questions you… that’s not science. That’s just a belief system.
Link to the letter/email to the court referenced above, check it out folks...its hilarious. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/notice-to-man-stuart-w-konyer-and-man-woman-acting-as-clerk/
Scott McFly
Awwweee....you sound so "offended", did your feelings get hurt, honey?
Christine keeps insisting I’ve made “virus claims.” I haven’t. She keeps repeating it anyway so she has something to argue with. That alone should tell people a lot about how this “debate” works. Its kinda like Covid messaging....repeat, repeat, repeat...
But let’s use Christine’s 'own words'.
She says she is a “living woman and not a legal fiction.”
She demands courts produce a “living flesh-and-blood woman named REGINA.”
She issues a $100,000,000 per hour fee schedule to judges and officials.
Yes… those are her claims to a fucking court, no less. 🤣🤣🤣
Meanwhile, Christine Massey does not hold recognized credentials in microbiology, yet insists the entire field of virology is fake and that thousands of scientists and labs around the world are all somehow part of the same illusion. 😎😎
Her method is simple: demand studies, pre-declare every possible method “pseudoscience,” ignore responses, then accuse critics of not providing evidence.
That’s not science. That’s a belief system with moving goalposts.
At this point I’m genuinely curious how far this rabbit hole goes. Flat Earth next? Moon landing hoax? Something even wilder? 🤣🤣
Either way, since she keeps bringing my name up, I’ll keep doing the same thing: posting her claims in her own words so people can decide for themselves.
Keep the comedy coming, Christine ....we are going to make you famous !!
Yes Scott, I am a living woman and not a legal fiction. Interesting how you found time to go rummaging through my website for documents on an entirely different topic instead of citing studies to back up your virus claims.
Virology labs do not adhere to logic/the scientific method, and my FOIs are for records that do adhere logic/the scientific method. Collecting hundreds of official legal confessions has helped many people around the world realize that we've been lied to all our lives and that there is no science to follow when it comes to imagined viruses. Why you are having such a hard time with this, I have no idea.
You have not been discussing the methodologies of virologists at all, beyond pasting AI content that lists methods that sound reasonable at a glance (i.e. "sequencing"). Those of us familiar with the literature know what "sequencing" really means in virology (construction of computer models based on thousands/millions of smaller sequences allegedly found in monkey/cow/human/bacteria/fungi mixtures, not shown to come from particles known to be viruses or from any particular particle at all, ASSEMBLED into sequences absurdly declared to be "viral genomes") You haven't responded to the problems that I've pointed out regarding those fake "genomes" or the point-and-declare EM images (which have further problems that I didn't mention to you yet), or even the ridiculous cell cultures. And you still haven't cited (with an actual title, authors, etc.) even 1 study that you think shows the existence of a virus. If you pick a study that includes animal experiments, I will then explain to you the fatal flaws in those studies as well, as I have already done in my newsletters and interviews and in discussions on social media, countless times already. You won't be able to find a study that used a valid independent variable (purified particles) and had necessary controls and used a valid exposure route...
And fyi, I have never posted about you Scott. I have simply commented under your posts. You on the other hand felt the need to post about me for some reason.
The virus model is worn out— thank you for your words. I wrote a playful article called “the most contagious and deadly virus known to humans.” I think it would be right up your alley!
I just read how many times you had to rephrase your request so the stupid people at CFIA could get your answer. thanks for being persistent. now we have to get the judge to recognize how illogical it is to kill an entire herd of 400 ostriches just because two got sick and died in WINTER.
@sylviaherchen1,
The PCR TESTS are a complete FRAUD.
What if the two ostriches were poisoned (accidentally or deliberately)?
Were autopsies performed, or mere PCR TESTS?
Chances are there are no surveillance cameras on the ostrich farm to help with these questions.
As for the Judge coming to the rescue...
In today's "2020-2025 GENOCIDAL COnVID PLANNEDemic" era, chances are even the judiciary can be compromised the same as the hospitals were financially incentivized to commit GENOCIDE and the same as Pediatricians being financially incentivized to commit GENOCIDE against the innocent children of the world since the inception of the childhood vaccine schedule.
Unfortunately the farmers are being taken for a ride (in my personal opinion) by a legal team that prefers to turn a blind eye to these official legal confessions, the glaring problems with virology and my notarized affidavit, and that argued for quackcines as an alternative to culling (they even wrote that this is an opportunity to quackcinate). They are going along with the false/fraudulent narrative instead of challenging it, and legitimizing CFIA's fake-authority. From what I've seen they don't even advise the farmers to prohibit the CFIA actors from coming on their property without a court order.
@christinemasseyfois1,
Unfortunately, you are correct about the Judge not helping the ostrich farmer "sua sponte" (on his own accord or volition).
Those who do not know they have rights, cannot exercise such rights...
Ultimately, it is up to the ostrich farmer (not the Judge) to exercise the ostrich farmer's property rights, titles, and interests vested in the ostriches for their own personal and private best interest (The ostriches are NOT a public interest matter until "proven" under verified solemn oath to be a public interest matter - see next paragraph).
If I were the ostrich farmer...
I would conditionally accept the public health agencies' offer to care for, to feed, to water, to examine, to house, to quarantine, to study, to test, to transport, to vaccinate, and/or to exterminate the ostriches under the condition that both the public health agencies and the participating court provide verified proof (signed under sworn oath and penalty of perjury and a penal sum of $100 million Canadian dollars Surety Bond per each ostrich) verifying the existence of the H5N1 Bird Flu Virus specifically per the specifications and terms stipulated in Christine Massey's FOIs. Otherwise, should both the public health agencies and the participating court fail to provide such verified proof, then both the public health agencies and the participating court and other associated parties of interest in the ostrich matter are welcome to care for, to feed, to water, to examine, to house, to quarantine, to study, to test, to transport, to vaccinate, and/or to exterminate the ostriches at the stipulated property use fee rate of $100 million Canadian dollars per each ostrich, per each associated several user of interest, per each use, per each day.
It's all germ theory vs terrain theory all over again, like germ theory was never empirically proven to be complete BS. And same with this zoonotic BS.... People would not be falling for this in the "age of information" if they would ask questions and use their devices to explore the way the world works, and not just allow themselves to be distracted by useless entertainment and forced fed fearful, sensationalist "news" that keeps them in their root chakra and purely animal instincts their whole lives. This is where people who consider themselves to be made in God's image over Darwin's find themselves to be the smartest and strongest of all the human race. The life of a shepherd ain't easy.
I found you on the Citizens Oversight, Save the Ostriches video on YouTube. You've provided the most valuable information that strikes straight to the heart of the matter and hopefully will arm Katie and her family with the ammo that they've needed to fight back against this murderous campaign. Thank you, Christine, you are a true champion and shepherd amongst a flock of lost and mislead sheep.
Thank you Natica. It's been frustrating that this information has been available for literally years now (well, at least the SARS-COV-2 FOIs and tons of material exposing virology from many other people), and very few 'health freedom' people are willing to put it to use. Hopefully more will as we go forward.
@christinemasseyfois1 and @naticasoychuk,
Re: Citizens Oversight’s video “LIVE: Save the Ostriches - Fighting Back Against a Heartbreaking Order”.
Thank you, @naticasoychuk, for mentioning the "Citizens Oversight’s YouTube video" regarding saving the ostriches.
You did a great job, Christine, presenting in the video and laying down the solid foundation of the irrefutable truth that VIRUSES do NOT exist in nature.
At video time-stamp 01:17:02…
Stephen Pelech, (Ph.D. Professor at the University of British Columbia Department of Medicine doing immunology research for over 40 years studying cancer proteins and Biochemist and President of Kinexus Bioinformatics Corporation.) accuses you (Christine Massey) of being wrong for claiming that “VIRUSES” do not exist.
It’s interesting to note that “The 2024 University of British Columbia (UBC) Endowment Summary Report” states that the market value of the Endowment assets managed by UBCIM reached “$2.40 billion” on March 31, 2024. https://give.ubc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/2024_UBC_Endowment_Update_Report.pdf
It would also be interesting to determine not only the market value of Stephen Pelech’s personal assets but also the market value of Stephen Pelech’s business known as the “Kinexus Bioinformatics Corporation”.
Now imagine, rather than you (Christine Massey) “challenging” Stephen Pelech’s offer to prove the existence of “VIRUSES”, you instead “conditionally accepted” Stephen Pelech’s offer to prove his assertion alleging the existence of “VIRUSES” in such a way that his proof is based upon the condition that if Stephen Pelech fails to prove the existence of “VIRUSES” per the terms stipulated by your VIRUS ISOLATE FOI REQUEST FORM that UBC’s Endowment funds and Stephen Pelech’s personal assets and the Kinexus Bioinformatics Corporation’s assets are attached to a new Private Foundation Trust Fund to help finance the necessary therapies, treatments, and living expenses required by the vaXXine-injured persons who became injured by vaXXines manufactured based on the FALSE and FRAUDULENT “VIROLOGY THEORIES” promoted over the past 40 years by the UBC and the Kinexus Bioinformatics Corporation under Stephen Pelech's tenure.
Only God knows how many innumerable vaXXine-injured persons could benefit from reallocating the market value of those UBC Endowment funds, Stephen Pelech’s personal assets, and Kinexus Bioinformatics Corporation’s assets for the benefit of the vaXXine-injured population.
If the Spanish Flu is nonsense, then what killed all those people? They had very real symptoms and how did they contract it? That was way before the time of Fauci and Trump.
Here are some insights:
Exploding the Spanish Flu Myth
https://healthfreedomdefense.org/exploding-the-spanish-flu-myth/
Christine, do you have any books that describe the information on your site. I checked Amazon.com and did not find any.
Do you mean books that specifically discuss the FOIs, or books exposing the germ narratives more generally? If you mean specific re the FOIs, Mark Gober discussed them in his book An End to Upside Down Medicine. Also James McCumiskey's book Overcoming the Germ Theory Medical Myth. Also I believe they were mentioned in an Italian book by Stefano Scoglio. Those are the ones I can think of off-hand.
Re germ narratives more generally, there are numerous. For example Virus Mania (by Torsten Engelbrecht, etc), What Really Makes You Ill (Lester and Parker), Contagion Myth (Tom Cowan), Can You Catch A Cold (Roytas)... there are others.
It has become clear to me that all "diseases" are not what they say they are. In fact, diseases (as described) are not really a thing. Pfizer's list of c. 1250 adverse reactions in the animal trials for c19 vaccine kinda tells us that. The injection can pretty much cause anything, depending on where it gets to in the body and how an individual reacts.
This girl is a danger to tptb, the satanic elite, reptilian cowards and the official narrative. I love you Christine and thank you for all the work you've put in since the plandemic began. I used to follow you on Twitter in 2020 until my account got suspended, the last of my worries. Al I said was "I'll inhale any virus any day" and "5g Millimeter wave pulsed signals are far more dangerous than normal sine waves. 20,000 AT&T new base stations went live today. More "coronaviruses" coming soon." That did it. Lol.
I always take screen shots of your work to educate the sheeple. I have backups on Google drive too. Nowadays, bird, pig, sars, hiv, Spanish, Russian, mers and ANY virus the msm propaganda speak of is "TO BE COMPLETELY IGNORED". Just like global warming/climate change Except, the evidence of such claims. I WILL be looking for evidence before I listen to the "experts" or, more likely, I won't participate in any of their experiments.
Viruses, not real. Electric Fields, chemtrails, glyphosate, Real and they're destroying our planet so much everyday, but tptb only focus on non existent climate change.
Again, thank you so much and God bless and protect you.
Thank you so much David, your words mean a lot :)
God bless you too!
Thanks for another sensible tome, Christine, and for a lovely audio of your son's band!
At the same time, all these "viruses" are photogenic:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-monkeypox-virus-allowed-itself
Kateryna Kon's last name seems fitting. And lol, since when can "viruses" be "photographed"? What absolute clownery.
Christine,
You are one of the last few remaining, and I haven't been getting notifications about your publications. I am going to catch up now... Just love ya'. :)
Oh that's interesting about the notifications, Ray, thanks for letting me know :)
Cheers
Here I share a conversation between two insightful people about “Spanish Flu”.
Not only are the exchanges filled with fascinating information, but they’re genuinely warm hearted people.
I give you Dom and Chris Waterson of Sheep Farm podcasts on “The Spanish Flu Nonsense”.
I think it’s the most effective refutation of what has been obviously concocted that you’ll find.
Best wishes
Mike
https://sheepfarm.co.uk/music/sheep-farm-20-msc2-the-spanish-flu-nonsense/
Thank you Dr. Y, I'll check it out :)
In recent times, despite leading respiratory therapeutics research in Pfizer for many years, I had a big shock.
When I repeat what I discovered, most people don’t believe it. I’m not asking you to believe me. It’s not my observations.
It is that acute respiratory illnesses that we call colds and ‘flu (more correctly, influenza-like illnesses or ILI) are NOT contagious.
There is more than a century of failure in the peer reviewed literature to show that a person, sick with one of these illnesses, can give it to another person who was well.
Many clinical studies placed a person with acute respiratory illness in proximity to a person without such symptoms for hours. The potential recipient was followed up for days to weeks.
The frequency with which they went on to develop similar symptoms was the same as in those who weren’t exposed to a sick person.
That’s a shock to most people, too. But there it is. Those are the consistent findings.
My conclusions are that acute respiratory illnesses we call colds & ‘flu are not contagious.
In turn, that means they are not caused by submicroscopic, infectious particles commonly named “respiratory viruses”.
No, I don’t know what causes colds and ‘flu. No, I don’t have an obligation to provide an alternative explanation. We don’t know what “causes” most diseases. I have some ideas, though they are not necessary in order to disabuse yourself of the false notion that “colds & ‘flu are caused by respiratory viruses”. A century of empirical evidence tells us they’re not.
I have lately been curious if anyone has tried to quantify their experiences of "contagion." By this I mean, we all have observed many cases of one person in a household getting some sickness, then someone else in the household gets the same or very similar symptoms, then another. We've been taught the theory of germs and contagion, so we look at such a situation and it confirms our belief that the second person caught the illness from the first, and the third from the first and/or the second.
BUT we all have ALSO observed many instances of one person in a household getting sick with a common illness (e.g., cold, flu, rash illness, etc.) and NO ONE else in that household "catches" it. Yet, because we believe that those illnesses are "contagious," we basically ignore those cases as irrelevant exceptions to the "rule."
I would love to see if anyone has ever attempted to quantify how many of the first situation occur vs. the second, in some kind of systematic observational study. In 2020 I collected stories of some often heart-wrenching "cases of covid," especially where young people died "from covid," or in one case a 4-y-o boy was hospitalized, and his mother stayed with him because if she left she would not have been allowed to return. In EVERY case there were people in the household who did not get sick and if they tested, were not "positive" for covid. In the 4-year-old's case, which I got from FaceBook, the mom is shown cuddling the boy, kissing him, not a shred of PPE between them. Neither she nor others in the family "caught" covid nor tested positive.
My hypothesis: people "catching" illnesses from those near them is a bias confirmation, not a demonstrable phenomenon. I'd love to have a way to test that hypothesis!
I'm not sure if anyone has kept track of situations in households, but you might find Daniel Roytas' new book interesting.
I'm planning on that, as soon as it's available from Lulu, or other non-Amazon source. Really looking forward to it; I've listened to/watched several interviews with him.
Bingo!
I'd be interested as to what your ideas to what causes colds and flu are Mike.
I had pneumonia in Sept 2019, which was almost certainly due to the cold weather. I was out in the evening with just a shirt and unpadded jacket on. The weather had suddenly changed from mild to winter cold and I started to come down with it as soon as I got home that evening.
I also was ill from breathing in the "Sahara Sands" in the summer of 2022, I went out in the evening to the shop when it was raining and started feeling ill as soon as I got home. It didn't feel like a regular "flu", but like i'd been breathing in some noxious substance - I could hardly breath. The following morning everything was covered with the yellow dust, which I suspect had been brought down in the rain the night before.