'bird flu' hoax update: đ lead agency still can't provide/cite scientific evidence of 'H5N1' or contagion of symptoms
July 11, 2024
Greetings and Best Wishes,
Background
You might like to skip this section if you have been following my newsletter in recent months.
My April 8, 2024 newsletter included:
Calvin Perrins and Michael O'Berniciaâs Notice of Conditional Acceptance for farmers being harassed by âgovernmentâ agencies over the imaginary âH5N1â (Calvin tells me this tool has been very successful in the U.K.);
Official âH5N1â FOI responses from the CDC, Public Health Agency of Canada, Japan's National Institute of Infectious Diseases, UK Animal and Plant Health Agency and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, showing that they have zero scientific evidence re the existence of âH5N1â;
An official 2023 confession that the âexpertsâ at Canadian Food Inspection Agency have zero scientific proof of the existence of any alleged âvirusâ that they claim has ever affected livestock in Canada;
Articles/videos exposing the âH5N1â scam,
Links to hundreds more âgermâ-related FOI responses.
Dr. Sam Baileyâs video and notes of May 21st covered the leaked May 9th âH5N1â round table discussion wherein people acting as âpublic health expertsâ in Canada strategized on how to pull off the latest âvirusâ hoax.
My June 10 newsletter reported that on June 6, 2024 the folks at Canadian Food Inspection Agency said (pg 10) that they needed up to 30 more days to hunt for the following studies requested back on May 9th:
studies that scientifically prove/provide evidence of the existence of "H5N1"
studies that describe purification of particles that are alleged to be "H5N1" directly from bodily fluid/tissue/excrement of "hosts"
studies wherein the purported "genome" of this alleged "virus" was found intact (as opposed to fabricated âin silicoâ aka a computer model)
studies that scientifically demonstrate contagion of the symptoms allegedly caused by said purported "virus".
Update re Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA)
Keeping in mind that CFIA is the âlead agencyâ in Canada on the supposed âH5N1â health threatâŚ
July 9, 2024:
Yashoda Maliah acting as Junior Analyst, Access to Information and Privacy emailed me a new letter âdigitally signed by Joannis, Heleneâ and a âRelease Packageâ (pgs 12-19). The letter reads:
âEnclosed, please find the documents pertaining to your request. Portions of the information have been exempted under section 68(a) of the Access to Information Act. A copy of this section is enclosed for your ease of reference.â
Here is the wording of section 68(a) at the time of my request:
â68Â This Part does not apply to
(a)Â published material, other than material published under Part 2, or material available for purchase by the publicâ.
âJoannis, Heleneâ is implying that documents pertaining to my request are held by CFIA and were sent to me, but âportionsâ were âexemptedâ because the material is already published or available for purchase.
The âRelease Packageâ is⌠4 pages in total. Each âdocumentâ is 2 pages in length, comprised of:
a form listing the name of a journal, the title of a âManuscript Draftâ, a list of âKeywordsâ, a list of âAuthorsâ, but no publication year or date, journal volume/issue, DOI (digital object identifier) or URL, i.e.:
and
a page saying that pages x to y are withheld pursuant to section 68(a), i.e. :
So the âRelease Packageâ contains zero studies, zero sentences from any studies, and zero complete citations of any published studies.
Continuing from the CFIA response letter (pg 14):
âPlease note the arlicles [sic] are available for purchase on BioRender. Cell Reports is an open-access journal where sustainable access to high-quality papers is supported by a fee. Further information about the journal and about publishing with us can be found here. Upon acceptance you will be offered a choice of two Creative Commons licenses as part of the publishing agreement that allow readers immediate access to the paper upon publication.â (bolding added)
The 3 bolded sentences above are a variation of content from the Cell Reports webpage that lists information for authors preparing manuscripts for submission and publication. The fact that they are included in the response letter despite being entirely irrelevant and inappropriate suggests to me that the entire response is the failed effort of some âAIâ algorithm.
Regarding the purported studies and the reference to âBioRenderâ, below is an excerpt from my July 10 response to âJoannis, Heleneâ and Mark Holland who acts as âThe Honourable Mark Hollandâ and âMinister of Healthâ, ccâd to Theresa Tam, Bonnie Henry, etc. (pgs 20/21):
âThank you, however I won't spend hours reading âBioRender'sâ terms of service, or agree to them, let alone consider giving money to âBioRenderâ - especially when I don't see any suggestion that the service provides access to journal articles and I can't find any evidence that studies with the listed titles even exist, anywhere.
Neither of the titles are listed on Pubmed, Sci-Hub, google, Yandex or the website of the relevant journal. The almost empty ârelease packageâ indicates âManuscript Draftâ under each title. The response provides no information regarding purported publication dates, journal volume/issue, doi or url.
âPhylodynamics of the h5n1 outbreak in north america reveals emergence of reassortants with increased fitnessâ - this title returned no results, and the title suggests a meaningless analysis of computer-model âgenomesâ that have no demonstrated relationship to the real world or my request. (Virologists always fabricate their âgenomesâ in silico, based on arrangements of countless sequences - none of which were ever shown to come from a specific particle let alone a replication-competent illness-causing âvirusâ.)
âMULTIPLE TRANSATLANTIC INCURSIONS OF HIGHLY PATHOGENIC AVIAN INFLUENZA CLADE 2.3.4.4B A(H5N5) VIRUS INTO NORTH AMERICA AND SPILLOVER TO MAMMALSâ - this title also returned no results, and the title suggests another delusional analysis based on more of the same, for an imaginary âvirusâ (âH5N5â) that wasn't even mentioned in my request.
I will be publishing an article about this response, showing everyone that despite the media's âH5N1â fear-mongering and the âpublic healthâ community conspiring to further demonize raw milk and cheese, invade privacy, frighten the public and implement âtestingâ to conjure up âcasesâ, the âlead agencyâ still can't demonstrate that it holds even a shred of scientific evidence that âthe virusâ even exists or that symptoms are contagious (as with all other âvirusâ claims).
I invite Mark and all of the âexpertsâ cc'd on this email to cite valid scientific evidence to back up their âvirusâ activities.
Silence will be interpreted as tacit admission that you are engaged in fraud, complicit in another hoax and not fit for âpublic serviceâ.â
If anyone finds an actual published study with either of the following titles, Iâd appreciate knowing about it⌠but wonât be holding my breath.
Phylodynamics of the H5N1 avian influenza outbreak in North America reveals the emergence of reassortants with increased fitness
Multiple transatlantic incursions of highly pathogenic avian influenza clade 2.3.4.4b A(H5N5) virus into North America and spillover to mammals.
(Note: this information has been sent to ~200 people who work for âthe stateâ, lamestream media, etc. at Canada, Isle of Man, England and the U.S., so that they canât claim later that they didnât know.)
Related Reading/Viewing
(Note: my sharing of content from an organization is not an endorsement of their lawsuits - please do your own careful research before deciding whether to donate.)
Closing the Chapter of Germ Theory with Daniel Roytas â Dr. Andrew Kaufman
Merrill Chase Inadvertently Disproved Antibodies in 1942
Inadvertently: without knowledge or intent â Mike Stone, viroLIEgy.com
Question The Virus Narrative with Samantha and Mark Bailey â Hilda Labrada Gore
Exploding the Spanish Flu Myth â Dr Sam Bailey
Smallpox is measles, measles is chickenpox and chickenpox is smallpox â Danni Møller
Dr Sam Baileyâs 2nd article published in the mainstream news outlet Canberra Daily:
Creating numbers for the pandemic industry
Dear Virology: Do You Have ANYTHING Other than Insults, Logical Fallacies and Lies to Back Up Your Claims?
Virology: An unwitting master class in exposing pseudoscience. â Anthony Colpo
Populations sucked into the vortex ofâŚmedical labels â Jon Rappoport
Why the Obsession with "Vaccine Safety"? It only ENRICHES Big pHARMa â Peggy Hall
Bird Shit - the Next Hoax - The Truth Shall Set You Free
Hundreds of Official Confessions/Evidence Showing that Virology is Pseudoscience (scroll down the page for the links)
For truth, freedom and sanity,
Christine
Youâd think by now it would be glaringly obvious the emperorâs wearing no clothes and that the only pandemic to be feared is not coming from barnyard animals but one of snake oil salesmen.
The pattern of problem-reaction-solution embedded in The Hegelian Dialectic is a repeating pattern that plays out in reality. In the universe of the Pharmaceutical Industry this is a seasoned and time honored strategy.
In the theatrical production of Avian Flu 2024, the media-manufactured fowl-based fear factor was founded on a mere four âconfirmedâ cases âdiscoveredâ in dairy workers. The primary symptom that sounded the alarms for the Pharma friendly bureaucrats at CDC Inc. was conjunctivitis (pink eye), a catch-all term for inflammation of the eye.
Eliminated from consideration were more reasonable explanations for why farm workers might have eye irritations such as, ever-present dust and dander found on farms, the boatload of chemical residues (from Roundup e.g.) that circulate throughout factory farms, or the ubiquitous dairy farm mountains of manure which release toxic ammonia.
To kick start the next pandemic bonanza the virus hunters, who dutifully serve the pharmaceutical syndicate, call upon the tried and true PCR shell game to hornswoggle the public into believing that another sinister, free-floating microbe is ready to strike!
Known for its ability to be manipulated in order to obtain the desired results, the decidedly non-diagnostic PCR process has proven to be the perfect tool for the art of medical deception and for casting a spell on an ill-informed public.
Truth to be told, identifying The Virus⢠is nearly superfluous, as all they need to do is create the perception of a pandemic, manufacture mass panic with staged Hollywood productions, and doomsday models and use the fraudulent PCR tests to manufacture the perception of an incoming alien invasion.
Voila! Another boondoggle to funnel tax dollars to Pharma executives and shareholders.
Many thanks for this ammunition, Christine.
Just a warning to the folks inhabiting the Resistance...
We do go on a coded list of people to be eliminated, one medical way or the other. I have known this since a 'rogue doctor' warned me that my demise was briefly suggested when my seven year campaign against vaccinations resulted in 30% of the entire region declining vaccines. Moreover, I then discovered black salve and, over a dozen years, used this to eliminate some 45 skin cancers, including one twice-clinically-diagnosed squamous cell carcinoma. Naturally, I spread the glad tidings. Widely.
Anyway, duly warned, I was unsurprised when a hospital doctor delivered a ten minute political quiz before applying all the high-tech equipment and diagnosing conjunctivitis; which I later found was a melanoma of the eye. Cute. Death by misdiagnosis. Just be warned; your earnest and dedicated young hospital doctor may well be your Medical Mafia hit man.
Christine, watch your back.