Greetings and Best Wishes,
In a new blog post yesterday, Sasha Latypova presented herself as quite an expert on "viruses" based on her own alleged "reading of literature, both old (~100 years) and more recent", and having interviewed "scientist" Sabine Hazan.
So in the comments I asked Sasha some questions. Our exchange was interesting, to say the least.
[Note: according to her resume, Sasha has a masters degree in business administration, and “led consulting engagements for pharmaceutical/biotech clients” who were working on drugs for imaginary Hepatitis C virus and imaginary HIV (note: I’m not denying illness here - it’s the cause of illness that is disputed, never shown to be a “virus”):
https://ratical.org/PandemicParallaxView/Latypova-Resume_102022.pdf]
According to Sasha:
- the virus-existence issue is a false binary. people discussing this topic are not asking the right questions. it doesn't matter!
- viruses definitely exist "as genetic signals"... but also as "what Kaufman calls an exosome"
- God made viruses and they are good. humans can't function without viruses. they are vital and necessary - except when they kill people or make them sick!
- Marburg virus killed people!
- gain-of-function is silly (I explained this already to RFK Jr!) - except when Ralph Baric combines bits and pieces of DNA and RNA in large quantities, adds scary messages and deploys them in the environment to create a hoax pandemic
- people with enough bifidobacteria are safe. everyone else is open to the viral messages that could trigger illness!
- Ivermectin works for covid, phew!
- Sabine Hazan identified SARS-COV-2 in the poop of patients with covid symptoms - using PCR! and "whole genome sequencing"!
- people who challenge our claims on "viruses" need to learn to think creatively - and redefine definitions. it's the only way to move forward!
- people who ask if Sabine's studies are valid and scientific, or ask for clarifications should write their own substacks. and go away!
- it's not constructive dialogue to persist with questions - people who do that are rude, aggressive and demanding. hysterical, funny clowns in fact!
- only the substack author gets to ask questions
- official legal confessions from hundreds of government institutions are a waste to time. mentioning them is gibberish! hop hop, run off! no one wants to see them!
- Christine Massey is deranged and can no longer function, poor thing. I banned her to put her out of her misery!
- my only stance is for truth by scientific method. that's why I'm highlighting the work of Sabine Hazan - who says "science is a story" and only included any control patients in her studies because the FDA and others "freaked out" on her
- Sabine and I have contempt for placebo-controlled studies. serendipity is so much better! we talked about this @44:30 in our interview
Screenshots:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Sasha-Latypova-PACKAGE-2023-03-24.pdf
Conversation with Dr. Sabine Hazan + my own thoughts on Ralph Baric, FDA and other pathogens -- by Sasha Latypova Mar 24
Big picture on "covid" - the microbiome hypothesis
My (Christine's) bizarre November 2021 email exchange with “scientist” Sabine Hazan:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/exchange-with-Hazan.pdf
Update: 10:20pm
A friend posted this summary on twitter, and now Sasha and Sabine have responded with some pretty incredible comments. According to Sabine, I’m a hater who has done “no research” and am “paid by the other side to create controversy”.
According to Sasha, I was “crying for help and self-harming” on her substack and “behaved like a drunk last night for 10 hours”! She says that she will testify about my “deranged behavior last night, if needed”.
Wow.
A colleague pointed out that according to Sasha’s linkedin profile:
“Ms. Latypova served as Head of sales and business Development at VirtualScopics, Inc. (VSCP) a leading developer of image-based biomarkers for improving pharmaceutical development. During her tenure at VirtualScopics, she expanded the client portfolio from one lead customer, Pfizer, to 6 of the top-10 pharmaceutical companies as well as multiple smaller pharmaceutical and medical device clients.”
Interesting!
FOIs Summary
Freedom of Information Responses reveal that health/science institutions around the world (214 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 (the alleged convid virus) isolation/purification, anywhere, ever:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/
Excel file listing 214 institutions:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Institution-list-for-website.xls
Growing collection of FOI responses re other imaginary viruses (HIV, avian influenza, HPV, Influenza, Measles, etc., etc., etc.):
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-have-no-record-of-any-virus-having-been-isolated-purified-virology-isnt-a-science/
FOIs re secretive and unscientifically "mock infected" cells (aka invalid controls) and fabricated "genomes":
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/do-virologists-perform-valid-control-experiments-is-virology-a-science/
3000 pages of "virus" FOIs (updated as of December 31, 2022) in 8 compilation pdfs, and my notarized declaration re the anti-scientific nature of virology:
https://tinyurl.com/IsolationFOIs
Do health and science institutions have studies proving that bacteria CAUSE disease?
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/do-health-authorities-have-studies-proving-that-bacteria-cause-disease-lets-find-out-via-freedom-of-information/
Because "they" (HIV, influenza virus, HPV, measles virus, etc., etc., etc.) don't exist and virology isn't a science.
For Truth, Freedom and Sanity
christine: unincorporated living woman of the Massey family who does not act as surety for a bankrupt corporation
at southern Ontario, Canada
It's too bad things work out like this. Your questions were, and remain, critical. So, don't stop. Neither will I. But sometimes you can put your finger where it hurts and people will do anything to avoid the pain. Also, I think that these two women imagine themselves to be important. And your questions challenged that identity. Just a guess.
Each has their own perspective and none seems to be complete. It is, as one looks at the light spectrum of superheated elements to find the black bands showing what is truly there. The black bands are facts. Many of the experts fall into the trap of extrapolating on fallacies, yet the information they reveal from their observations of other facts is important to the understanding of the entire puzzle. I commend all who work so hard to uncover this operation at their level, be it micro or macro.
It is apparent that the "no virus has been proven" is fact. Christine, Baileys, Cowan, Lanka, Kaufman and others work from this black band of truth. The focus of others uncovers truths in their spectrums.
We all benefit from the open debate but not from infighting and personal attacks.
"Pursue With Vigor"