This not only shows that the courts are broken, but they reveal their guilt by running from the truth. Thanks for sharing this fantastic information. Have you heard of Alphonse Faggiolo? He goes after the insurance companies indirectly by filing BAR grievances against government attornies: https://iamhassentmetoyou.com/forums/users/alphonse/replies/
Got it. Yes Alphonse is in the US (Pennsylvania) but he has a wonderful forum and telegram channel - he's created quite a community there where you can ask questions etc.
After listening to Marvin’s interview I want to qualify my comment… it’s not a victory, per se. His case was dismissed and no witnesses were heard. The judge seemed biased and wanted to get the issue off the table. Non the less, we can claim now that they do t want this issue being discussed and now my virus loving friends have to look at that (at least). 👍
I would say it's a victory because 1) the case was dropped, 2) others now have an example of how to fight any "virus"-related charges, 3) the "government" had the chance to prove in court that the imaginary virus does exist, but ran away instead.
I have a new take on lung physiology that dismisses the idea that gases, oxygen and carbon dioxide, are dissolved in our blood and are exchanged in the lungs.
My Substack article is titled: We breathe air not oxygen
I discuss the difference between air and oxygen and the cause of oxygen toxicity.
I discuss the role of salt - water must follow salt not lead in the equation of hydration
If we are to dismantle the multiple layers of medical retardation, this new way of viewing lung physiology must be explored robustly.
Underpinning my research is Peter Peterson’s free eBook available at smashwords
100 reasons water is not H2O
The corruption of how we are schooled to view water as a chemical equation is the MAJOR disruptor in science and medicine.
May curiosity be your friend
Jane333
Smashwords – 100 Reasons Water Is Not H2O – a book by Peter Peterson
Parabéns Christine Massey, espero que o processo crime que coloquei contra a DGS e MS Português, por todas as restrições ditatoriais que colocaram na sociedade Portuguesa tenha também um final feliz, para TODOS NÓS!
That was the case. He was fined 3 years ago this month for leaving his house without wearing a mask, and brought the case on the basis that the entire set of policies that caused his being fined was not based upon sound science.
Yep, excellent point. I don't think this would work in Australia. They would just say: The Emergency Act has been declared, so, whatever we say or do, you MUST obey without questioning anything. Period.
You are right. Let's not assume. Most people are misinformed, that's a better assumption. I was misinformed less than one year ago.
How much was the fine?
Maybe it costs more money the process (and eventual appeals) than simpley letting go.
Just imagine, a bit city, tens of thousands of small fines about nothing, the cost of all the worthless work of civil servants, and lawyers and magistrates... if the "small" fines where much larger, then it would make sense. But then the courts would become in a band of highway robbers. Well, I'm exaggerating...
Thank you for the correction. What I meant was that the court was not tasked with the case. Allegedly because there was no chance to win it for the DA, but practically because somebody was actually honest there. :)
There is an english transcript of the post-trial interview here:
https://truthcomestolight.com/marvin-haberland-shares-results-of-his-court-case-against-virology-in-germany/
And here is NEXT LEVEL'S website, with information for people who might like to pursue Marvin's approach (this is not legal advice!):
https://www.wissen-neu-gedacht.de/gerichtsprozess-die-next-level-Strategie
This not only shows that the courts are broken, but they reveal their guilt by running from the truth. Thanks for sharing this fantastic information. Have you heard of Alphonse Faggiolo? He goes after the insurance companies indirectly by filing BAR grievances against government attornies: https://iamhassentmetoyou.com/forums/users/alphonse/replies/
Oh thank you, I have been thinking of doing something along those lines with the people who act as crown attorneys against myself.
Got it. Yes Alphonse is in the US (Pennsylvania) but he has a wonderful forum and telegram channel - he's created quite a community there where you can ask questions etc.
super, thanks :)
Sure thing, thank you Christine for all your work in raising awareness!
Hi Christine, I know you're really busy, but also I imagine you have a really good filing system. I think I remember that Tom C or Andrew K did a really good run down of this https://www.cbc.ca/radio/quirks/jan-7-a-real-viral-video-is-scientific-innovation-stagnating-rocks-from-the-oort-cloud-and-more-1.6703639/viral-video-watch-this-microscopic-virus-try-to-infect-a-cell-1.6705850 'viral' activity video but I can't find it.
No worries if you have too much to do, or don't have it to hand, it's only for a comment on a post.
Many thanks,
Jox
After listening to Marvin’s interview I want to qualify my comment… it’s not a victory, per se. His case was dismissed and no witnesses were heard. The judge seemed biased and wanted to get the issue off the table. Non the less, we can claim now that they do t want this issue being discussed and now my virus loving friends have to look at that (at least). 👍
I would say it's a victory because 1) the case was dropped, 2) others now have an example of how to fight any "virus"-related charges, 3) the "government" had the chance to prove in court that the imaginary virus does exist, but ran away instead.
Thank you dear Christine and Marvin, you two are just great!!!
https://maryann255.substack.com/p/the-truth-is-always-on-the-other-64b
Thank you Mary-Ann :)
That's great news!
Congratulations Marvin!
Dear Christine
I have a new take on lung physiology that dismisses the idea that gases, oxygen and carbon dioxide, are dissolved in our blood and are exchanged in the lungs.
My Substack article is titled: We breathe air not oxygen
I discuss the difference between air and oxygen and the cause of oxygen toxicity.
I discuss the role of salt - water must follow salt not lead in the equation of hydration
If we are to dismantle the multiple layers of medical retardation, this new way of viewing lung physiology must be explored robustly.
Underpinning my research is Peter Peterson’s free eBook available at smashwords
100 reasons water is not H2O
The corruption of how we are schooled to view water as a chemical equation is the MAJOR disruptor in science and medicine.
May curiosity be your friend
Jane333
Smashwords – 100 Reasons Water Is Not H2O – a book by Peter Peterson
Another update about Marvin -- just posted today from Dr Tom Cowan (first 35 minutes):
https://rumble.com/v2kmczw-q-and-a-webinar-from-april-26th-2023.html
Thanks! Just watched it :)
Good interview with Dr Sam Bailey last October for background
https://drsambailey.com/resources/videos/interviews/marvin-vs-virology-covid-taken-to-court/
So, what you’re telling me is this “Social Distancing” song by The Wiggles was not actually based on ‘the science’?
This way to the clip 🎥 https://youtu.be/jUmSiLXesKI
lol!
Did you happen to catch Emma (Yellow) Wiggle flash 2x 666’s at the 6 second mark of the clip? 🤔
Oh wow, no I hadn't seen that.
They always creeped me out!
Parabéns Christine Massey, espero que o processo crime que coloquei contra a DGS e MS Português, por todas as restrições ditatoriais que colocaram na sociedade Portuguesa tenha também um final feliz, para TODOS NÓS!
Yes!! All the best with it!! xoxo
They knew a hot potato when they saw one. :-)
Great news! Here are a couple of videos in English about the case. (the one from Kate Sugak is current).
·
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/Marvin-vs-Virology-COVID-Taken-To-Court:3
https://odysee.com/@katie.su:7/thecourtcaseagainstvirology:0
Thanks so much for sharing this on-the-ground information Bill!
Was Marvin sued for something? What?
he was fined under the bogus fake covid legislation
Good interview with Dr Sam Bailey last October for background. 👍
https://drsambailey.com/resources/videos/interviews/marvin-vs-virology-covid-taken-to-court/
That was the case. He was fined 3 years ago this month for leaving his house without wearing a mask, and brought the case on the basis that the entire set of policies that caused his being fined was not based upon sound science.
Thanks! Since when do policies or laws have to be based on sound science?
Yep, excellent point. I don't think this would work in Australia. They would just say: The Emergency Act has been declared, so, whatever we say or do, you MUST obey without questioning anything. Period.
😂 😂 😂
In Germany they do.
I'll share far and wide! Thank you Christine!
YYYYYYYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!
I don't understand much German, but thanks for the post!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Carry on, Excellent Truthies !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I am marking my calendar as a BIG BATTLE in the WAR against the PEOPLE --- a WIN!
Good news, and quite admirable, when it comes to a court that functions properly.
In the last three years, I have been advocating for refuting Germ Theory, with a focus on the fraud of "viral infections."
Moreover, here is my summary of and projection for a new medical paradigm, which is badly needed to replace the current "medical" fraudsters:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/what-makes-people-sick-apart-from
The court did not rule about the validity of the policy, the state chose to not pursue the case.
LOL!
Obviously!
They know.
Just imagine the face of a young prosecutor or a young judge that didn't know something like that before this day. LOL!
You shouldn't assume they know. They may simply think it wasn't worthwhile pursuing the case.
You are right. Let's not assume. Most people are misinformed, that's a better assumption. I was misinformed less than one year ago.
How much was the fine?
Maybe it costs more money the process (and eventual appeals) than simpley letting go.
Just imagine, a bit city, tens of thousands of small fines about nothing, the cost of all the worthless work of civil servants, and lawyers and magistrates... if the "small" fines where much larger, then it would make sense. But then the courts would become in a band of highway robbers. Well, I'm exaggerating...
Thank you for the correction. What I meant was that the court was not tasked with the case. Allegedly because there was no chance to win it for the DA, but practically because somebody was actually honest there. :)
We don't know that, all we know is that the state chose to not pursue it.
Occam's Razor ...
That is default explanation.