71 Comments
User's avatar
Christine Massey FOIs's avatar

There is an english transcript of the post-trial interview here:

https://truthcomestolight.com/marvin-haberland-shares-results-of-his-court-case-against-virology-in-germany/

And here is NEXT LEVEL'S website, with information for people who might like to pursue Marvin's approach (this is not legal advice!):

https://www.wissen-neu-gedacht.de/gerichtsprozess-die-next-level-Strategie

Expand full comment
Roman S Shapoval's avatar

This not only shows that the courts are broken, but they reveal their guilt by running from the truth. Thanks for sharing this fantastic information. Have you heard of Alphonse Faggiolo? He goes after the insurance companies indirectly by filing BAR grievances against government attornies: https://iamhassentmetoyou.com/forums/users/alphonse/replies/

Expand full comment
Christine Massey FOIs's avatar

Oh thank you, I have been thinking of doing something along those lines with the people who act as crown attorneys against myself.

Expand full comment
Roman S Shapoval's avatar

Got it. Yes Alphonse is in the US (Pennsylvania) but he has a wonderful forum and telegram channel - he's created quite a community there where you can ask questions etc.

Expand full comment
Christine Massey FOIs's avatar

super, thanks :)

Expand full comment
Roman S Shapoval's avatar

Sure thing, thank you Christine for all your work in raising awareness!

Expand full comment
Jo Waller's avatar

Hi Christine, I know you're really busy, but also I imagine you have a really good filing system. I think I remember that Tom C or Andrew K did a really good run down of this https://www.cbc.ca/radio/quirks/jan-7-a-real-viral-video-is-scientific-innovation-stagnating-rocks-from-the-oort-cloud-and-more-1.6703639/viral-video-watch-this-microscopic-virus-try-to-infect-a-cell-1.6705850 'viral' activity video but I can't find it.

No worries if you have too much to do, or don't have it to hand, it's only for a comment on a post.

Many thanks,

Jox

Expand full comment
SLOCORE.FIT by RISE PILATES's avatar

After listening to Marvin’s interview I want to qualify my comment… it’s not a victory, per se. His case was dismissed and no witnesses were heard. The judge seemed biased and wanted to get the issue off the table. Non the less, we can claim now that they do t want this issue being discussed and now my virus loving friends have to look at that (at least). 👍

Expand full comment
Christine Massey FOIs's avatar

I would say it's a victory because 1) the case was dropped, 2) others now have an example of how to fight any "virus"-related charges, 3) the "government" had the chance to prove in court that the imaginary virus does exist, but ran away instead.

Expand full comment
Mary-Ann's avatar

Thank you dear Christine and Marvin, you two are just great!!!

https://maryann255.substack.com/p/the-truth-is-always-on-the-other-64b

Expand full comment
Christine Massey FOIs's avatar

Thank you Mary-Ann :)

Expand full comment
agnt RogerW, on Holy Night's avatar

That's great news!

Congratulations Marvin!

Expand full comment
Jane 333's avatar

Dear Christine

I have a new take on lung physiology that dismisses the idea that gases, oxygen and carbon dioxide, are dissolved in our blood and are exchanged in the lungs.

My Substack article is titled: We breathe air not oxygen

I discuss the difference between air and oxygen and the cause of oxygen toxicity.

I discuss the role of salt - water must follow salt not lead in the equation of hydration

If we are to dismantle the multiple layers of medical retardation, this new way of viewing lung physiology must be explored robustly.

Underpinning my research is Peter Peterson’s free eBook available at smashwords

100 reasons water is not H2O

The corruption of how we are schooled to view water as a chemical equation is the MAJOR disruptor in science and medicine.

May curiosity be your friend

Jane333

Smashwords – 100 Reasons Water Is Not H2O – a book by Peter Peterson

Expand full comment
Gram's avatar

Another update about Marvin -- just posted today from Dr Tom Cowan (first 35 minutes):

https://rumble.com/v2kmczw-q-and-a-webinar-from-april-26th-2023.html

Expand full comment
Christine Massey FOIs's avatar

Thanks! Just watched it :)

Expand full comment
Rhoda's avatar

Good interview with Dr Sam Bailey last October for background

https://drsambailey.com/resources/videos/interviews/marvin-vs-virology-covid-taken-to-court/

Expand full comment
Shadow Boxer Diaries's avatar

So, what you’re telling me is this “Social Distancing” song by The Wiggles was not actually based on ‘the science’?

This way to the clip 🎥 https://youtu.be/jUmSiLXesKI

Expand full comment
Shadow Boxer Diaries's avatar

Did you happen to catch Emma (Yellow) Wiggle flash 2x 666’s at the 6 second mark of the clip? 🤔

Expand full comment
Christine Massey FOIs's avatar

Oh wow, no I hadn't seen that.

They always creeped me out!

Expand full comment
Francisco Paias's avatar

Parabéns Christine Massey, espero que o processo crime que coloquei contra a DGS e MS Português, por todas as restrições ditatoriais que colocaram na sociedade Portuguesa tenha também um final feliz, para TODOS NÓS!

Expand full comment
Christine Massey FOIs's avatar

Yes!! All the best with it!! xoxo

Expand full comment
Jeffrey Strahl's avatar

They knew a hot potato when they saw one. :-)

Expand full comment
Bill Huston's avatar

Great news! Here are a couple of videos in English about the case. (the one from Kate Sugak is current).

·

https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/Marvin-vs-Virology-COVID-Taken-To-Court:3

https://odysee.com/@katie.su:7/thecourtcaseagainstvirology:0

Expand full comment
Roman S Shapoval's avatar

Thanks so much for sharing this on-the-ground information Bill!

Expand full comment
Terry's avatar

Was Marvin sued for something? What?

Expand full comment
Christine Massey FOIs's avatar

he was fined under the bogus fake covid legislation

Expand full comment
Rhoda's avatar

Good interview with Dr Sam Bailey last October for background. 👍

https://drsambailey.com/resources/videos/interviews/marvin-vs-virology-covid-taken-to-court/

Expand full comment
Jeffrey Strahl's avatar

That was the case. He was fined 3 years ago this month for leaving his house without wearing a mask, and brought the case on the basis that the entire set of policies that caused his being fined was not based upon sound science.

Expand full comment
Terry's avatar

Thanks! Since when do policies or laws have to be based on sound science?

Expand full comment
Vee's avatar

Yep, excellent point. I don't think this would work in Australia. They would just say: The Emergency Act has been declared, so, whatever we say or do, you MUST obey without questioning anything. Period.

Expand full comment
Gram's avatar

😂 😂 😂

Expand full comment
Jeffrey Strahl's avatar

In Germany they do.

Expand full comment
Doug Leclair's avatar

I'll share far and wide! Thank you Christine!

Expand full comment
The Word Herder's avatar

YYYYYYYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!

I don't understand much German, but thanks for the post!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Carry on, Excellent Truthies !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I am marking my calendar as a BIG BATTLE in the WAR against the PEOPLE --- a WIN!

Expand full comment
Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)'s avatar

Good news, and quite admirable, when it comes to a court that functions properly.

In the last three years, I have been advocating for refuting Germ Theory, with a focus on the fraud of "viral infections."

Moreover, here is my summary of and projection for a new medical paradigm, which is badly needed to replace the current "medical" fraudsters:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/what-makes-people-sick-apart-from

Expand full comment
Jeffrey Strahl's avatar

The court did not rule about the validity of the policy, the state chose to not pursue the case.

Expand full comment
agnt RogerW, on Holy Night's avatar

LOL!

Obviously!

They know.

Just imagine the face of a young prosecutor or a young judge that didn't know something like that before this day. LOL!

Expand full comment
Jeffrey Strahl's avatar

You shouldn't assume they know. They may simply think it wasn't worthwhile pursuing the case.

Expand full comment
agnt RogerW, on Holy Night's avatar

You are right. Let's not assume. Most people are misinformed, that's a better assumption. I was misinformed less than one year ago.

How much was the fine?

Maybe it costs more money the process (and eventual appeals) than simpley letting go.

Just imagine, a bit city, tens of thousands of small fines about nothing, the cost of all the worthless work of civil servants, and lawyers and magistrates... if the "small" fines where much larger, then it would make sense. But then the courts would become in a band of highway robbers. Well, I'm exaggerating...

Expand full comment
Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)'s avatar

Thank you for the correction. What I meant was that the court was not tasked with the case. Allegedly because there was no chance to win it for the DA, but practically because somebody was actually honest there. :)

Expand full comment
Jeffrey Strahl's avatar

We don't know that, all we know is that the state chose to not pursue it.

Expand full comment
Gram's avatar

Occam's Razor ...

Expand full comment
Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)'s avatar

That is default explanation.

Expand full comment