Greetings, Best Wishes and Happy New Year,
This article is for anyone who has seen Dr. Meryl Nass’ new year’s eve no-virus rant and doesn’t yet realize the inanity of Meryl’s comments or her “invitation” for ““no virus” team members to tell me what they isolated instead that explains the conditions I just listed.”
Someone who claims to be quite familiar with my FOI work and very close to a Canadian virologist actually sent me this article as evidence that no-virus people are “skirting” something!
So, below are screenshots of a few responses that were left under the gaslighter’s article, starting with my own.
(There are now close to 1400 comments on the article - showing what a hot topic no-virus has become.)
(Here is the live link to my August 2022 emails with the gaslighter, and here is my general response to gaslighters of the “virus” FOIs.)
The response of Michael Wallach, director of the excellent 5-part docu-series The Viral Delusion:
The response of analytical chemist Saeed Qureshi is published here
(a partial screenshot is given below):
Author Curtis Cost’s response:
(Here is the interview where Curtis and I discussed the issue at length, and here you will find the live link to the 2022 Holland/Wallach/Rasnick discussion mentioned by Curtis.)
On new year’s eve, Meryl also tweeted a short video clip of Dr. Kevin Corbett - who has been calling out the lack of “SARS-COV-2” evidence since early 2020 and is a long-time critic of the official “HIV”/AIDS narrative - along with a remarkably fallacious comment about the no-virus issue.
The last I checked, Meryl had received a huge amount of push-back to that tweet and almost no support - because more and more people are catching onto the fraud/delusion of virology every day.
If you are new to the topic and looking for more information, there great teachers/whistleblowers such as Stefan Lanka - who was trained as a virologist, has a remarkable court victory involving the imaginary “measles virus” under his belt and had control experiments performed that disprove the bizarre assumptions of virologists…
… and tons of easy-to-understand resources from Tom Cowan, Andrew Kaufman, Sam and Mark Bailey, Mike Stone, Alec Zeck, Stefano Scoglio, Jon Rappoport, Steve Falconer, Kate Sugak, and many more - including Dawn Lester and David Parker who wrote an entire book addressing “What Really Makes You Ill?” - collected here.
You’ll also find a link to the legendary and very in-depth work of The Perth Group, focusing on the imaginary “HIV”.
FOIs Summary
Freedom of Information Responses reveal that health/science institutions around the world (220 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 (the alleged convid virus) isolation/purification, anywhere, ever:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/
Excel file listing 220 institutions:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Institution-list-for-website.xls
FOI responses re other imaginary viruses (HIV, avian influenza, HPV, Influenza, Measles, etc., etc., etc.):
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-have-no-record-of-any-virus-having-been-isolated-purified-virology-isnt-a-science/
FOIs re secretive and unscientifically "mock infected" cells (aka invalid controls) and fabricated "genomes":
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/do-virologists-perform-valid-control-experiments-is-virology-a-science/
3000 pages of "virus" FOIs (updated as of December 31, 2022) in 8 compilation pdfs, and my notarized declaration re the anti-scientific nature of virology:
https://tinyurl.com/IsolationFOIs
Do health and science institutions have studies proving that bacteria CAUSE disease?
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/do-health-authorities-have-studies-proving-that-bacteria-cause-disease-lets-find-out-via-freedom-of-information/
Because "they" (HIV, influenza virus, HPV, measles virus, etc., etc., etc.) don't exist and virology isn't a science.
For truth, freedom and sanity,
Christine
Below is a link to new animal species discovered in 2024 alone. Unlike viruses and new viruses, there are actual isolated, live examples of these species that can be held, touched, and researched in real time. Their entire life cycles can be observed, and they can be dissected. Even if any of them were only found dead, their corpse stands alone as unique from any other known species on earth.
Virology has never isolated a virus. The illness that are attributed to them are akin to noticing a partially eaten leaf and inventing the creature that ate it based on only the size & shape of the marks on the leaf. They could write research papers about the species, draw up sketches, commission illustrations of the species in the wild eating a leaf. Now imagine that later on, other actual creatures are found eating the leaves real time, and leaving identical marks, the inventor (not discoverer) of the new species refuses to admit they were wrong, that they have not only have never seen their invented creature eating a leaf, they've never seen the creature, and thus cannot produce a living example of it. They would be exposed as and declared a fraud.
That's where we are with viruses. None can be isolated from a sick individual, let alone on surfaces or captured in ambient air around a sick individual or exiting their respiratory orifices. None exist in a test tube, petri dish, or blood sample. No government agency on earth has a record of an isolated virus. The electron microscope images purported to be viruses are of little oval things encased in resin that could be anything. That's it. That's all they have. Nothing.
And because scientific principles have not been adhered, virology is a pseudoscience.
One does not need a degree in medicine or science or anything else to identify a fraud, a long con, a scam.
https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/5-new-animal-species-discovered-in-2023
You prompted me to write this.
https://curingcoviddiseases.substack.com/p/why-is-virus-vs-no-virus-such-a-hot