Some responses to no-virus gaslighter, Meryl Nass
January 3, 2024
Greetings, Best Wishes and Happy New Year,
This article is for anyone who has seen Dr. Meryl Nass’ new year’s eve no-virus rant and doesn’t yet realize the inanity of Meryl’s comments or her “invitation” for ““no virus” team members to tell me what they isolated instead that explains the conditions I just listed.”
Someone who claims to be quite familiar with my FOI work and very close to a Canadian virologist actually sent me this article as evidence that no-virus people are “skirting” something!
So, below are screenshots of a few responses that were left under the gaslighter’s article, starting with my own.
(There are now close to 1400 comments on the article - showing what a hot topic no-virus has become.)
(Here is the live link to my August 2022 emails with the gaslighter, and here is my general response to gaslighters of the “virus” FOIs.)
The response of Michael Wallach, director of the excellent 5-part docu-series The Viral Delusion:
The response of analytical chemist Saeed Qureshi is published here
(a partial screenshot is given below):
Author Curtis Cost’s response:
(Here is the interview where Curtis and I discussed the issue at length, and here you will find the live link to the 2022 Holland/Wallach/Rasnick discussion mentioned by Curtis.)
On new year’s eve, Meryl also tweeted a short video clip of Dr. Kevin Corbett - who has been calling out the lack of “SARS-COV-2” evidence since early 2020 and is a long-time critic of the official “HIV”/AIDS narrative - along with a remarkably fallacious comment about the no-virus issue.
The last I checked, Meryl had received a huge amount of push-back to that tweet and almost no support - because more and more people are catching onto the fraud/delusion of virology every day.
If you are new to the topic and looking for more information, there great teachers/whistleblowers such as Stefan Lanka - who was trained as a virologist, has a remarkable court victory involving the imaginary “measles virus” under his belt and had control experiments performed that disprove the bizarre assumptions of virologists…
… and tons of easy-to-understand resources from Tom Cowan, Andrew Kaufman, Sam and Mark Bailey, Mike Stone, Alec Zeck, Stefano Scoglio, Jon Rappoport, Steve Falconer, Kate Sugak, and many more - including Dawn Lester and David Parker who wrote an entire book addressing “What Really Makes You Ill?” - collected here.
You’ll also find a link to the legendary and very in-depth work of The Perth Group, focusing on the imaginary “HIV”.
FOIs Summary
Freedom of Information Responses reveal that health/science institutions around the world (220 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 (the alleged convid virus) isolation/purification, anywhere, ever:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/
Excel file listing 220 institutions:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Institution-list-for-website.xls
FOI responses re other imaginary viruses (HIV, avian influenza, HPV, Influenza, Measles, etc., etc., etc.):
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-have-no-record-of-any-virus-having-been-isolated-purified-virology-isnt-a-science/
FOIs re secretive and unscientifically "mock infected" cells (aka invalid controls) and fabricated "genomes":
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/do-virologists-perform-valid-control-experiments-is-virology-a-science/
3000 pages of "virus" FOIs (updated as of December 31, 2022) in 8 compilation pdfs, and my notarized declaration re the anti-scientific nature of virology:
https://tinyurl.com/IsolationFOIs
Do health and science institutions have studies proving that bacteria CAUSE disease?
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/do-health-authorities-have-studies-proving-that-bacteria-cause-disease-lets-find-out-via-freedom-of-information/
Because "they" (HIV, influenza virus, HPV, measles virus, etc., etc., etc.) don't exist and virology isn't a science.
For truth, freedom and sanity,
Christine
Nass is always defending her evidence-free positions on bogus bioweaponry and defending her paycheck from CHD and her idolatry of RFK jr.
That is always in the background of whatever lunacy de jeur she is espousing.
She also gets pretty intolerant of anyone who challenges her and she NEVER provides evidence to support any of her quackery.
Can someone cite for me just one instance where biological weaponry have been used to the detriment of even a meager number of the populace where it was used?
In any case, someone might want to inform Meryl that Ebola is every bit the fiction that Covid is.
I've banned David A Howard for 1 month, for bot-like behaviour, repeatedly posting inane, pointless, misleading comments like:
"Christine Massey: RFK Jr = trustworthy"
"Tamara Lich: Arthur Firstenberg = trustworthy"
and Facebook links to the same.