Peter McCullough's obelisk "science"

Greetings and Best Wishes,

Peter McCullough recently published on substack an interview with “scientist” and PCR patent holder Kevin McKernan about “viroids” and “obelisks” and how they supposedly compare to imaginary “viruses”.

I sent Peter some observations and questions about the publications they’d cited and thought they might be worth sharing. So here is my email. The “Science” article is here, the related study is here.

***

Hi Peter,

You recently published an article about "viroids and obelisks", and cited the new publication from "Science".

Did you notice that the author of the "Science" article referred to genomes "seemingly" composed of loops of RNA, and included this quote about "creative" work by researchers on "viroids"?

"The Stanford search yielded nearly 30,000 predicted RNA circles, each consisting of about 1000 bases and likely representing a distinct obelisk."

It doesn't sound like they're very certain about any of this.  What do you think?

And from the preprint study:

“Obelisks” share several properties: (i) apparently circular RNA ~1kb genome assemblies, (ii) predicted rod-like secondary structures encompassing the entire genome, and (iii) open reading frames coding for a novel protein superfamily, which we call the “Oblins”.

... Obelisk RNA reads assemble into ~1000 nt circles, which are predicted to fold into rod-like RNA secondary structures and code for at least one member of a novel “Oblin” protein superfamily

The word "predicted" appears quite a few times in this paper.  

"Likely" appears 13 times.  

"Apparently circular" appears 8 times.

"Other scientists are delighted by obelisks’ debut. “It’s insane,” says Mark Peifer, a cell and developmental biologist at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. “The more we look, the more crazy things we see.”"   
                                                                                                                           -- "Science"

Pretty funny, huh?  

Christine

*** end of email ***


Related

The Smartest Virus Advocates Tell Us How They Know For Sure That It's Real
A Planet Waves FM Special Report from Eric Coppolino:

“We hear from James Corbett, Dr. Suzanne Humphries, Dr. Josesph Mercola, Dr. Mark Trozzi and the iconic Whitney Webb — who explain how they know they're correct about the existence of SARS-CoV-2.”

Seeking more weird, funny or ridiculous quotes from 'medical freedom' presenters
“Our last effort was a tremendous success. Thank you. AUDIO IS UPDATED.”
— Eric Coppolino

Label Worship & The Stunt Demoness😈 — Proton Magic
Virus claimant Kämmerer runs like a mouse from label busters

Smallpox and vaccination. A glimpse of forgotten history — Danni

FOIs Summary

Freedom of Information Responses reveal that health/science institutions around the world (220 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 (the alleged convid virus) isolation/purification, anywhere, ever:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/

Excel file listing 220 institutions:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Institution-list-for-website.xls

FOI responses re other imaginary viruses (HIV, avian influenza, HPV, Influenza, Measles, etc., etc., etc.):
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-have-no-record-of-any-virus-having-been-isolated-purified-virology-isnt-a-science/

FOIs re secretive and unscientifically "mock infected" cells (aka invalid controls) and fabricated "virus genomes":
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/do-virologists-perform-valid-control-experiments-is-virology-a-science/

3000+ pages of "virus" FOIs (updated as of December 31, 2022) in 8 compilation pdfs, and my notarized declaration re the anti-scientific nature of virology:
https://tinyurl.com/IsolationFOIs

Failed freedom of Information responses re contagion:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/freedom-of-information-responses-re-contagion/

Do health and science institutions have studies proving that bacteria CAUSE disease?
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/do-health-authorities-have-studies-proving-that-bacteria-cause-disease-lets-find-out-via-freedom-of-information/

Because "they" (HIV, influenza virus, HPV, measles virus, etc., etc., etc.) have never been shown to exist, clearly don't exist and virology isn't a science.

For truth, freedom and sanity,
Christine