44 Comments

Scientific misdirection is what they use but the gold standard can't or could never be used otherwise they would have used it to, with all due respect, shut you up. Another great post Ms. Massey.

Expand full comment

It's pretty irritating to see aaaaallllll these supposed "experts" from all over the whirled (and you thought a centrifuge was a spin!) try to bullshit their way, with extraordinarily arrogant snootiness, through a blatant attempt to steamroll anyone who questions them, as if virology is SO FAR BEYOND the understanding of nearly everyone who ISN'T a virologist-- And what IS a virologist? Either a very brainwashed dupe, or a stinky liar. Blech. Keep 'em on their knees, CM. The house of cards is on fire.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpSOWfFtKJE

Expand full comment

A large majority of "experts," especially in matter of health, stop even pretending to learn anything new once they're pronounced "experts."

Thanks again, Christine and the FOIAs team.

Expand full comment

SHOCKING INFO.... SHERRY B. & DR. BRYAN ARDIS - THE HIDDEN TRUTH & LIES ABOUT NICOTINE & MUCH MORE! https://rumble.com/v4jc7b8-artk251-sherry-b.-and-dr.-bryan-ardis-the-hidden-truth-and-lies-about-nicot.html

Expand full comment

Ardis has been a promoter of the snake venom garbage narrative about "COVID."

Expand full comment

Yes he has and Dr. Kaufman and Cowan tried to school him, especially Dr. Kaufman. Ardis humbly accepted correction. Short time later he continued with the snake venom story...smh..

Expand full comment

As soon as Kaufman and Cowan were out of the picture (off the Zoom), he resumed the narrative which he had just admitted was false. That's worse than his original idiocy and pretense that he knew what he was talking about.

Expand full comment

Beware of snake oil salesman lol

Expand full comment

Recently someone I thought was sorta on the ball told me that Roundup is snake venom.

Uh-- time to go lol.

Expand full comment

🤣🤣🤣

Expand full comment

Most experts are worthless shills only making claims for the money, control or notoriety. They strictly follow certain agendas to the determent of the public.

Expand full comment

Great post, thanks. Yet another virus fraud whose 'cure' kills and injures mostly young women. Morality, standards, if it saves one life etc.

The 'experts' point to a 2002 study that provides no proof of anything and pace this post, they knew in 1983 that all humans have specified DNA strains artificially linked to the magic HPV virus. As dumb as saying that I am my cat since we both share common DNA (90% supposedly).

Autism is the same - all 'studies' are old and hearken back to 1993 and a fraudulent report absolving the quackcines of causing autism. The sheeple believe.

$cience and $cientism. The make believe world of mainstream science-fiction. An unholy church.

Expand full comment

.

Taking The Vaccine

Was Such A BAD Idea

That It Will Follow Them

Into The Next Life.

It Also Helps Explain

How They Showed Up Here

So Fucking Stupid.

.

Expand full comment

We had the same shingles commercials ( government sponsored ) on TV here also in Australia. I thought the same thing .

Expand full comment

Simple question, what are warts and herpes sores ? I am not questioning the virus lie , I just want an explanation what specifically what are warts , and herpes simplex sores ?

Expand full comment

Think about this! (I recently heard this, and I wrote it down verbatim, in a conversation between Dr. Tom Cowan and Alec Zeck, a quote from Florence Nightingale, which I find very compelling: "There are no specific diseases. There are only specific disease conditions. All disease, at some period or other in its course is more or less a reparative process, not necessarily accompanied with suffering-- An effort of Nature to remedy a process of poisoning or decay."

Expand full comment

https://ia800905.us.archive.org/9/items/notesonnursingnigh00nigh/notesonnursingnigh00nigh.pdf

I've not seen the quote; "There are no specific diseases. There are only specific disease conditions." in Florences 1860 book, "Notes on Nursing", I've read that it was only in the first edition & omitted from later ones, if we go to Pg 5 we can see the correctly quoted part bracketed {thus} "Shall we begin by taking it as a general principle-that {all disease, at some period or other of its course, is more or less a reparative process, not necessarily accompanied with suffering : an effort of nature to remedy a process of poisoning or of decay,}- which has taken place weeks, months, sometimes years beforehand, unnoticed, the termination of the disease being then, while the antecedent process was going on, determined ? ........The reparative process which Nature has instituted and which we call disease has been hindered by some want of knowledge or attention, in one or in all of these things, and pain, suffering, or interruption of the whole process sets in...."

If the "no specific diseases" quote has been omitted we get a clue as to her thoughts on Pg 19, where Florence refers to diseases as not been "individuals/seperate entities";

"Diseases are not individuals arranged in classes, like cats and dogs but conditions growing out of one another.

"Is it not living in a continual mistake to look upon diseases, as we do now, as seperate entities which must exist like cats & dogs? Instead of looking upon them as conditions, like a dirty and a clean condition, and just as much under our own control ; or rather as the reactions of kindly nature, against the conditions in which we have placed ourselves.

like we do now, which must exist. I was brought up, both by scientific men and ignorant women, distinctly to believe that smallpox, for instance, was a thing of which there was once a first specimen in the world, which went on propagating itself, in a perpetual chain of descent, just as much as that there was a first dog, (or a first pair of dogs,) and that small-pox would not begin itself any more than a new dog would begin without there having been a parent dog.

Since then I have seen with my eyes and smelt with my nose small-pox growing up in first

specimens, either in close rooms, or in overcrowded wards, where it could not by any possibility have been "caught," but must have begun. Nay, more, I have seen diseases begin, grow up, and pass into one another. Now, dogs do not pass into cats.

I have seen, for instance, with a little overcrowding, continued fever grow up; and with a little more, typhoid fever; and with a little more, typhus, and all in the same ward or hut.

Would it not be far better, truer, and more practical, if we looked upon disease in this light? For diseases, as all experiences shows, are adjectives, not noun substantives."

We get a further clue as to her thoughts about disease on Pg 78-79, "nature alone cures";

"It is often thought that medicine is the curative process. It is no such thing ; medicine is the surgery of functions, as surgery proper is that of limbs and organs. Neither can do anything but remove obstructions ; neither can cure ; nature alone cures. Surgery removes the bullet out of the limb, which is an obstruction to cure, but nature heals the wound"

Referring to her 1858 work, "Notes on Hospitals" we see her views on infection contagion & disease on Pg 7; "The word 'infection,' which is often confounded with 'contagion,' expresses a fact, and does not involve a hypothesis. But just as there is no such thing as ' contagion,' there is no such thing as inevitable ' infection.' Infection acts through the air. Poison the air breathed by individuals and there is infection. Shut up 150 healthy people in a Black-hole of Calcutta, and in twenty-four hours an infection is produced so intense that it will, in that time, have destroyed nearly the whole of the inmates. Sick people are more susceptible than healthy people ; and if they be shut up without sufficient space and sufficient fresh ail', there will be produced not only fever, but erysipelas, pyamia, and the usual tribe of hospital-generated epidemic diseases.." And again on Pg 92; "When fever, erysipelas, or gangrene spreads in any hospital, such an event is no proof of ' contagion' or inevitable ' infection.' On the contrary, it is Nature's method of teaching men that her laws are being neglected. If a medical officer, or nurse, has fallen victim to the disease, we may be quite sure that the disease is not to blame, but those who failed to observe and to obey the laws by which the disease is infallibly prevented from extending itself."

https://archive.org/details/notesonhospitals00nigh/page/6/mode/2up

Expand full comment

Wow, thanks for this, I'm going to copy and keep it. :)

I took that quote from Tom Cowan, as I said. I didn't check it to be verbatim, but I should have, so thanks. I think it did capture what she was saying, with a little Cowanism thrown in, I guess, tho his version was not in such length as what you have found-- perhaps he read the same thing and was pulling that from memory, I don't know. Anyway, I think what she said makes Perfect Sense. I also think that what Ethel D. Hume said in her book "Bechamp or Pasteur?" which, among other issues, covers the serious breach of ethics when money is merged into something like SCIENCE (or maybe nearly anything!).

And look how long it took for us to begin to understand that!

Great comment, I really appreciate your effort.

Expand full comment

Thanks Word Herder, the following link is Tracey Northerns take on that (mis)quote; https://northerntracey213875959.wordpress.com/2021/11/03/answer-from-a-dead-nurse-on-what-is-disease/

The "quote" has been doing the rounds for a few years now.

Bechamp or Pasteur? was an eye opener for me & as you say "serious breach of ethics when money merged with science , (anagram of "medical science" is "licensed scam") also on Pasteur this;

Dr M. L. Leverson speech Pasteur the Plagerist 25/5/1911; https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/ptid=mdp.39015081399316&view=1up&seq=16 And this from 1889 "Pasteur limposteur" by Dr Auguste Lutaud; ".....the investigation is overwhelming, the data and the conclusions irrefutable. This book is a valuable historical document, which proves that the Pasteur system was based on fraud from the outset...."

https://www.dymocks.com.au/book/pasteur-limposteur-by-auguste-lutaud-9782377900138 (use gulag translate)

I enjoy reading books that pre-date the legitimizing of germ hypothesis, ATM I am up to Pg 24 of "Are Epidemics Contagious" (1887) https://archive.org/details/b2169056x/page/26/mode/2up "Are we then to assume, that the virus is given out from the bodies of the sick under two different forms, that of a gaseous or volatile, and that of a fluid or solid substance ? This is possible, but it is not probable. If unable to determine the exact nature or quality of the agent productive of epidemic and pestilential diseases, we shall be still more puzzled to account for the manner in which it produces its effects...."

Expand full comment

Oh, YOU are a GEM!!! How cool to find someone who has similar interest! And it does makes sense that I'd find you on this page... I do love what Christine does.

I will check out these links, thank you!

My secret (no longer, now!) dream is to study REAL medicine... Will have have time or the means to do it, we shall see... Hopefully I can at least study it on my own. It's fascinating!! I feel like I've suddenly run into a whole 'nuther WORLD... The one the Bad Guys tried to shut down, and now is being re-opened... YEAH! It's sort of like finding out that magic is REAL... And it's simply a very basic Truthiness... For THIS new world opening to me and everyone, I am thankful for "Covid." They say an alcoholic has to hit rock bottom before healing begins...

^_^

Expand full comment

Cheers! And you're a tonic! I've been skimming through "woofings", so there may be a comment here & there....although I type v-e-r-r-r-y s-l-o-w-w-w-l-e-y.

Expand full comment

Dr Jennifer Daniels has said that her patients with herpes sores get better upon consuming more collagen, so not enough collagen (combined with rubbing the skin) is one possibility. Sam might have offered some possibilities in her video. I have a bad memory for details like this, which is one reason I stick to my narrow lane. I'm not an all-around health person, just helping to expose the pseudoscience around "germs".

Warts I don't know, sorry, but I think Tom Cowan and/or Baileys have talked about them.

Expand full comment

I think you'd also find this quote compelling ^ that I put in the comment above, from Florence Nightingale... Have you heard this? I am really energized by this! (The response to David Smith April 3. Cheers.

Expand full comment

Yes, it's great!

Expand full comment

Try Dr Tom Cowan - he will tell you if it's known, or else say that it's unknown.

Expand full comment

Thanks , I think if there is a refutation of virus theory ( which I agree is a lie , viruses don’t exist) any natural thought would be well what are warts ! I will stick with that one ! Fungal I have a sneeking suspicion that’s what it probably is like shingles and herpes along with an imbalanced holobiome.

Expand full comment

Funny you mentioned shingles. Shortly after the poisonous shots were released in this country, I noticed that some medical clinics here started advertising specifically for shingles suffferers. As far as I could recall, I'd never seen such narrow medical targeting before. As pharma companies can't market direct to consumers here, I guess they already knew it to be a likely side effect, so they rewarded their loyal retailers with some inside knowledge.

Expand full comment

One of the big obstacles is that people have to struggle with the fact that they have been harming their loved ones.

As always, the road to hell is paved with good intentions.

Expand full comment

In the wake of the deadly consequences stemming from those peddling the virus lie, and the disturbing collaboration of certain “health” authorities in spreading this killer falsehood, I've endeavoured to craft a reimagined rendition of U2’s "Sunday Bloody Sunday."

This rendition doesn’t come close to doing justice to Christine’s unwavering dedication in exposing the complicity of “health” agencies and officials perpetuating the deadly “virus” lie.” There is perhaps no greater undertaking than this exposé to liberate us from the tyranny of the World Harm Organization’s One “Health” Final Solution for global “overpopulation.”

Feel free to use these lyrics to sing along to the original live at Red Rock.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EM4vblG6BVQ

This song is not a rebel song. This song is “Poison, Bloody Poison.”

I can’t believe my inbox today

I can’t close my eyes and make re p Lies to Ruth’s FOIs go away

How long, how long must we endure this wrong?

How long? How long?

‘Cos SSI

Doesn’t av one doc

To cite

The virus lie over Childrens’ graves

Dead Bodies strewn across world cemeteries

I won’t heed the jabbers call

It puts my back up, puts my back up against the wall

Poison, Bloody Poison

Poison, Bloody Poison

Poison, Bloody Poison

Poison, Bloody Poison

Alright, let’s go

And the battle, a constant rerun

There’s many lost, Big Pharma has just begun

The graves dug by toxic darts

Poisoned mothers, children, brothers, sisters torn apart

Poison, Bloody Poison

Poison, Bloody Poison

How long, how long must we endure this wrong?

How long? How long?

‘Cause tonight we can be as one, tonight

Tonight, tonight (Poison, Bloody Poison)

Tonight, tonight (Poison, Bloody Poison)

Alright, let’s go

Wipe the tears from your eyes

Wipe your tears away

I’ll wipe your tears away

I’ll wipe your blood clot eyes

Poison, Bloody Poison

Poison, Bloody Poison

Poison, Bloody Poison

Poison, Bloody Poison

Yeah, let’s go

To the virus lie we are immune

Viroliegy’s “science” is fiction; the jab injured reality

And today the millions cry (Poison, Bloody Poison)

We eat and drink while tomorrow they die (Poison, Bloody Poison)

The real battle just begun (Poison, Bloody Poison)

To claim “victory” for the lives lost

By Poisons, Bloody Poisons, yeah

Poisons, Bloody Poisons

Expand full comment

Love :)

Expand full comment

👍👍♥️💕♥️💕🌈

Expand full comment

Isn’t it time to apply for a Guinness record entry? As the chief prophet declared that “the science is settled”, there are two options: 1) a record number of non-existent proofs for the “settled” science as evidenced by tier 1 institutions, or 2) a record number of years of the practice of the medical science (best counted in centuries) without justifying evidence.

Seriously, all this is no longer anecdotal. It appears that absence of verifiable evidence is the standard approved method of practice. Even science fiction authors have never ventured to run fantasies that far - in sci-fi logic and realism seem to be more valued.

Expand full comment

Illuminating angle.

Expand full comment

I don't recall the doctor/scientist's name, but years ago, this fellow was determined to find a cure for AIDS. So he commenced to attack the problem by focusing on HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) which all the "experts" said caused AIDS. Try as he might, he could find no verifiable, scientific link between HIV and AIDS, and he had access to every medical and laboratory data base on earth. Frustrated, he mentioned this to one of his colleagues. To his astonishment, his colleague said, "Well, everyone just knows that HIV causes AIDS so you don't need any proof." (another System, sycophant, jackass). This spurred the guy to go deeper into the rabbit hole and lo and behold, he discovered that there is no proof that HIV exists. Like all other "viruses", it has never been isolated and purified in accordance with double blind studies. AIDS is another hoax perpetrated by the monstrous criminal and satanic medical/pharmacological cartel, which world-wide generates more money than the military/armaments industry. We're talking trillions of dollars with a "T". I wonder if they can spend it in Hell. Thanks for another Haymaker, Christine. (that's slang for a knockout punch.)

Expand full comment

I think you’ll appreciate the info here:

https://www.theperthgroup.com/

Expand full comment

Kary Mullis - inventor of the PCR.

Expand full comment

Conveniently died shortly after covid-19 came on the scene...hmm...

Expand full comment

Also a big fraud btw

Expand full comment

very good questions. Does it rain because the Indeginous fakir dances? is someone healed because someone else prayed? Does the sun come up because I greet it? Even if someone has an upset stomach, is it because they are a can of beans? there is so much that has been told us as truth, but is it? Does one thing cause another? If the computer says something exists, does it? We might be getting sick from what is sprayed on our food, on our beans. Maybe the prayer is a lot more certain than the rest!

Expand full comment

Keep 'em coming, Christine. Thank you!

Expand full comment

Just imagine if the girls, teens and women damaged by this worst of all jabs knew the truth?

Expand full comment

this is why I have stopped trying to redpill people. Ignorance might be bliss.

Expand full comment

Exactly. That reminds me, I should have included Joan Shenton's documentary...

Expand full comment