Hey, CM, have you ever read a book called "Bechamp or Pasteur?" - by Ethel Hume?
It's a bit of a slog, esp. at the beginning, but WOW, it just slams all this stupid "virus" (and ALL the so-called airborne microbes bullshit) right outta the universe.
i hope you have seen the Dr. Samantha Bailys latest video on substack 11/26/2023 (((((((((((((((( TITLE ----- A FOR ANTIVAXXER )))))))))))) its a mind blower bigtime------ if this dosen't convince people i have no idea how to help them-------------------------------- your video also says it all and shows it all in modern time really super great------- a must admit i love it all
And the beat goes on. Completely false claims of isolation and purification keep coming up, only to turn out to be based upon nothing more than assertions and fumes and cries of "that's well known." :-) Thanks for continuing to push for disclosure, Christine, the cockroaches run off when the lights are turned on.
These weren't my FOIs to WS, and it seems to me that the people at WS simply do not want to cooperate and would probably cite the same exemption agin no matter what the requester might request next.
Their current response makes no sense, saying that they went to the trouble of doing a search but then decided not to provide a response about the results of the search. If a request was exempt, they would not bother doing a search. The exemption is an excuse to avoid admitting that they have nothing.
In my experience, at least 99% of everybody whom I question about their theories/ideas on virtually any important sociopolitical issue seem to "mind"--if becoming prickly indicates minding.
The first FOIA request filed in any specific matter should always be considered in good faith - due to the lack of any prior signs of attempted “burdening” of the operations of the institution. “Vexatious or repeated requests” by definition should only be referred to when similar scopes of requests are reported, or when new requests are filed in short time proximity. In either case, the institution should have already prepared the comprehensive reply to the first (original) request. With this task being completed, the requested information should be published on any official site of the institution for anyone to check or download - thus eliminating any risks of interruptions to the operations of the institution AND fulfilling the obligation to provide FOIA requested data.
As simple as that. Absence of this easy procedure leaves room for bad publicity and shows bad management habits, potentially distracting valuable employees’ time to what should be a one-time quickie. NOTE: I am not referring to any particular institution, it’s just a common sense approach to routine administrative tasks in any undertaking. Do what is necessary once, do it properly, and forget about it. This specifically applies to ANY small business, where formal tasks are most expensive in terms of time and effort.
As I am in West Sussex, England that was interesting, if hardly surprising.
Hey, CM, have you ever read a book called "Bechamp or Pasteur?" - by Ethel Hume?
It's a bit of a slog, esp. at the beginning, but WOW, it just slams all this stupid "virus" (and ALL the so-called airborne microbes bullshit) right outta the universe.
I think you can get it at Target, or...
https://www.barnesandnoble.com › w › bechamp-or-pasteur-douglas-hume › 1113323832
Thanks WH. I've heard of it but not read it. I'm the slacker in the no-virus crowd :)
slacker????? uh, no.
Happy holidays, lovely. woof!
i hope you have seen the Dr. Samantha Bailys latest video on substack 11/26/2023 (((((((((((((((( TITLE ----- A FOR ANTIVAXXER )))))))))))) its a mind blower bigtime------ if this dosen't convince people i have no idea how to help them-------------------------------- your video also says it all and shows it all in modern time really super great------- a must admit i love it all
And the beat goes on. Completely false claims of isolation and purification keep coming up, only to turn out to be based upon nothing more than assertions and fumes and cries of "that's well known." :-) Thanks for continuing to push for disclosure, Christine, the cockroaches run off when the lights are turned on.
Thanks Jeff. I pray people are waking up to this delusion.
They ARE, sez the Dog. Butt, not in the MEDICAL field, which is full of weeds and dead stuff and squirrel bones, anyway.
To put it politely.
:)
Don't stop Christine. You are doing a fantastic job. So, sorry that I cannot financially assist you sincerely.
Thank you SJ, for the equally valuable mental/emotional support!!
Cheers
The FOIs rejected by West Sussex. Did you try to resubmit the request, but just 1-2 virus names?
Then how can they say it is "vexatious"?
These weren't my FOIs to WS, and it seems to me that the people at WS simply do not want to cooperate and would probably cite the same exemption agin no matter what the requester might request next.
Their current response makes no sense, saying that they went to the trouble of doing a search but then decided not to provide a response about the results of the search. If a request was exempt, they would not bother doing a search. The exemption is an excuse to avoid admitting that they have nothing.
But someone else could try, and see what happens.
Truth
Does not mind being questioned.
A Lie
Does not liked being challenged.
It really is as simple as that.
In my experience, at least 99% of everybody whom I question about their theories/ideas on virtually any important sociopolitical issue seem to "mind"--if becoming prickly indicates minding.
I hear you.
Good point.
Christine,
Please give us just one instance where "a virus" has been proven to exist.
Please!
The suspense is killing us.
Thanks for mentioning my song "The Ballad of Typhoid Mary." Free access to videos and audio tracks can be found here:
Get my FREE PDF with links to all my music videos and original audio demos. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/add-ons-to-final-master-video-collection
And here's another FREE PDF with links to my final audio (non-video) tracks along with my original rough piano demos. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/original-piano-demos-and-final-audio
The first FOIA request filed in any specific matter should always be considered in good faith - due to the lack of any prior signs of attempted “burdening” of the operations of the institution. “Vexatious or repeated requests” by definition should only be referred to when similar scopes of requests are reported, or when new requests are filed in short time proximity. In either case, the institution should have already prepared the comprehensive reply to the first (original) request. With this task being completed, the requested information should be published on any official site of the institution for anyone to check or download - thus eliminating any risks of interruptions to the operations of the institution AND fulfilling the obligation to provide FOIA requested data.
As simple as that. Absence of this easy procedure leaves room for bad publicity and shows bad management habits, potentially distracting valuable employees’ time to what should be a one-time quickie. NOTE: I am not referring to any particular institution, it’s just a common sense approach to routine administrative tasks in any undertaking. Do what is necessary once, do it properly, and forget about it. This specifically applies to ANY small business, where formal tasks are most expensive in terms of time and effort.
Bingo.
.
Mother Nature’s Job
Is To Inform The Vaccinated
That They Have Violated
The Terms Of Their Warranty.
- Payback’s A Bitch.
.