Share this discussion
"germ" FOIs - McCullough, McKernan, CDC, French researcher, Doherty - no records! & notarized declaration
christinemasseyfois.substack.com
|
60 Comments
© 2024 Christine: unincorporated woman of the Massey family
Substack is the home for great culture
update this link pls:
idefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Kevin-McKernan-49-patents.jpg
correct: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Kevin-McKernan-49-patents.jpg
On the Authority of Life
===============
Only the Author has authority over its creation. Nobody else.
Some call it God, others Infinite Being, etcetera.
So it is between me, I and the ultimate Creator.
Can you giva away that authority ?
Mwah, not sure . . . it depends from what angle to look at this.
Can someone else claim to have authority over me, I ? NO, well actually some say they have by all kinds of constructs.
Can powers exercise force on my physical existence ? YES, frustating enough, it can happen.
Do I let that happen ? Hmmm, probably yes.
How to reclaim my liberty ( free-doom, lol ) ? Very silently, secretly. hahahah.
Start to weave protective dynamic walls around you, but keep them invisible, untraceable. Become more connected with Mother Earth. She has my best interest at Heart.
.
Hi Christine, first of all thank you so much for all your hard work.
I would like to give a suggestion on the subject of personal safety (and of the safety of people in your heart).
Some people are more receptive to feelings of threats than others. And that includes a thing called pre-cognition. Yes, I know, we are coming into unchartered waters :)
I am not a religious person, but i study the Bible and the teachings of all religions. Why ? Because there is wisdom hidden into these texts. Why hidden ? Because over time ideas change and new ideas get persecuted by the then exatblished 'order'. So the Bible is full of dark sayings, on purpose !
I am not going to point them out to you, but you can find ideas about personal, psychic protection in many publications. Some are veiled, others are more open. Some talk about conjurers of magic, and give it a color (mostly just black and white, which in my idea is a bit simplistic). I call magick the effort to induce a change in a way that is more or less meta-physical or para-physical (yes, it is a word, i had to look that one up :). In western culture i believe it is called 'experimental science', lol. Yes, all the gadges around us are kind of magick. To the extreme : even a stick someone picks up with the intent to hurt an other is a (primitive) form of magick. And walking in a crowd one can feel 'things', ' sticks and stones' . . .
How to diminish the theat-level ? Do the Ho'o-pono-pono exercise !
https://graceandlightness.com/hooponopono-for-forgiveness/
https://www.laughteronlineuniversity.com/hooponopono-4-simple-steps/
This is also explained by Neville Goddard in his book 'The Promise and the Law'
Keep an open mind, be scientific about it. Test it on a small thingie first and take it from there.
I will picture you safe and healthy !
Dr. Cowan and I first discussing the real reason for gain of function hype in October 2021.
https://secularheretic.substack.com/p/interview-with-dr-tom-cowan-4a9
Assumed you had. I know it's dated but thought people might like to see a written breakdown of this as Naomi brings it to light.
Hi Christine,
From Naomi Wolf:
https://fos-sa.org/2021/08/02/fda-document-admits-covid-pcr-test-was-developed-without-isolated-covid-samples-for-test-calibration-effectively-admitting-its-testing-something-else/
So good to see you Back on the Stack!
You are a HERO, big time, and you are officially on my Good Vibes List...
Take good care, WE LOVE YOU and LOVE your Good Work!
xo xo xo
Blest Wishes, Happy Holidays No Matter What!
What an incredible document.. As Tom rightly said - your contribution to the movement is indispensable - thankyou! You are greatly appreciated.
Thanks so much for all you do. One question, being a stickler for evidence/ proof, and although it's not a big deal, I've seen others refer to you with PhD after your name. Is that true? If so, from where and when? I don't want to tag on an untrue appendage to your name.
A superb and important summary, thank you sincerely Christine, acknowledging with admiration your tenacity, endurance and hardship. I will cross post.
Hi, Christine.
I feel compelled to offer you a heartfelt thanks, and the acknowledgement due a courageous person such as yourself.
The partakers of this deadly corruption that is rampant, and practically enforced, all across our world, it appears, are soon to be gnashing their teeth, and I send you the peace that may come to the one that devotes all of their will, requiring at times the sacrifice of one's own life, so that the Truth may Stand.
If they should usher you from this fleshly life, as so many have already been martyred, I hope that you go as a Saint, in total peaceful defiance, and that your strength may humble the devils, should they pursue that course.
If I may be so bold, do not be led to waste time with the evident witch, Sage Hana, who openly bragged how that was her aim, on her and your 'garden talk', upon which she'd rather fluff her ego than do any real work, such as that which you are doing, and have done!
And if you should need a place to escape to from your would be killers, I invite you to my humble desert home in the SW US, where you may breathe easier for as long as you should require, in this relatively peaceful and protected sanctuary, if such should ever be necessary.
That offer is no joke in any sense of the word, as many may have need of such in these dark days.
Blessings, meanwhile. 🛡️🗡️⚖️
The bitchute video with Cowan, Bailey M, Corbett K and Kaufman contains 'incitement to hatred'!!!
so I can't watch x
and here's David Lamb again reply to Colleen Huber of Defeat Covid's fawning nonsense; 'I'm curious about what your "knowledge and clinical experiences" with viruses consists of. Have you ever taken a sick patient fluid sample and had a lab isolate 'virus' particles directly from the sample? Do you know any other doctor who has done that? Or do you know of even a single published study that's done that and provided a method that's transparent and repeatable?
Isn't it obvious that since no one has yet proven they're adding a 'virus'-laden sample to the virology lab culture, then there's no evidence that the exosomes excreted as the culture cells die were due to any 'virus', especially considering that the lab method is designed to kill the cells whether a patient sample is added or not?
So what is the "knowledge" that you speak of that's being thrown out? Wouldn't the more honest description be that the established "beliefs" are being thrown out by many?
If we could all be brutally honest, doctors and non-doctors alike would admit that the 'virus' story has been accepted as truth because it seemed to fit the illnesses that we see, and there's no better explanation that we know of so we'll stick with the 'consensus' explanation although there's no scientific evidence to support it.
But is it 'scientific' to say that there can not possibly be a completely different explanation for the symptoms that you see, especially in light of the century-long failure of Rockefeller medicine to prove their 'virus' theory?
The bottom line is that it just seems to be human nature that people will stubbornly refuse to let go of a deeply-held belief system if there's not something 'better' to replace it. We just can't bring ourselves to admit that we just have no idea, and not even a good theory.
Funny thing is, that insecurity-based, stubborn refusal to look at beliefs and admit they're just beliefs is that it locks us into a paradigm represented by those beliefs, and we cannot grow out of it until we let go and accept that we don't really 'know'.
Maybe the people who've been paying attention to the "devastating scam aspects" of the covid era and are therefore realizing that the purveyors of the "accepted" narrative are a bunch of
sociopaths and con artists are the smart ones, for refusing to believe their stories any longer?
And yes, it does seem like a far leap, but only because you and everyone else have been domesticated and robbed of the knowledge that you can actually jump right over the fences.'
who is this guy???
I want to share with him my perfectly good, and much better than viral theory of where symptoms come from ! https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/brainwashing-about-contagion-is-a
🐒
I hope you've all seen the brilliant reply to Peter Mcollough and his pictures of a viurs by David Lamb, Cosmic consultant, coming soon to substack, who had to pay to do so;
I'm writing this comment, Dr. McCullough only because I have great respect for your willingness to speak truth as you see it in the face of an establishment that doesn't want to hear it. I really hope you keep going with that attitude, because there's so much more to discover.
The article perfectly demonstrates how totally illogical conclusions and nonsense 'research' is passed off as scientific conclusions.
First, need I remind you that the 'vaccines' that are killing probably millions of people globally, and injuring many times more, are "well accepted" too? And I could make a long list of ideas "well accepted" that are very irrational, but I think you get the point.
The first two sentences are full of condescension, misrepresentation, and factually incorrect assertions. German virologist/microbiologist Dr Stefan Lanka has been exposing the fact that virology is all fraud for almost 30 years, so those who've actually studied the research are hardly motivated by "endless frustrations". And in fact nobody is "denying the existence" of anything. The "denying" allegation is your manipulative spin as a form of mockery. Those of us who've put in the work to go through a century of virology research and fully understand Lanka's conclusions are not denying the existence of anything. What we're saying is that there is no published research to date that demonstrates isolating a 'virus' from a sick person. It is the Rockefeller medicine establishment, which you represent, that's the party claiming there's a SARS-CoV-2 'virus' and "it" is the cause of the new disease. Therefore the burden of proof is on you and Rockefeller medicine, and that burden has not been satisfied. Because a few people have discovered the virology con, and have challenged the supposed proof that the establishment puts forward, we're labeled "virus deniers" as clueless people laugh, everyone assures each other that there's still 'consensus' that there's really a virus making everyone sick, and that's the end of it, in your view. No need to actually, honestly look at the research and answer the tough questions, because there's "consensus". What a profoundly cowardly reality...
Laboratory methods in virology do not "demonstrate cellular invasion, replication, transfer and repeated infection". The claimed 'virus' is only an end product of the culture of dying cells; there is no isolated 'virus' at the beginning, so the assertion of "invasion" is pure imagination. The same 'virus' can be produced with no sick patient sample added at the beginning, which is why the "well accepted" virology lab processes never include true controls. The so-called 'viruses' are exosomes, which you probably know are encapsulated genetic debris from the process of cell death. Virology has simply perfected the methods for reliably producing cell death via added toxins and inducing cell starvation in ways that trigger the release of certain types of exosomes, which are then photographed and touted as proof of 'viruses'.
And if the exosomes are then added to a new cell culture, that also receives the same cocktail of additives that poisons and starves the cultured cells, voila, more exosomes excreted by the dying cells, and 'proof of virus transmission'! No, it's only proof that people are being willfully blind.
Surely, Dr McCullough, you must be aware of Christine Massey's two-and-a-half year FOIA campaign to find the "well accepted" proof of isolation of a SARS-CoV-2 'virus'. With over 200 responses from government health agencies and scientific institutions all over the world, not one can cite any research proof of virus isolation. Their replies do not claim Massey misunderstands what constitutes 'virus isolation'; they simply admit they have no proof of virus isolation. This includes the US CDC.
So the photos you parade here are completely meaningless, utter nonsense, because you have no idea what the photographed particles are or where they came from. Revealingly, the article says nothing about where they came from, not even in the footnotes or references. The article simply asserts that they're SARS-CoV-2 particles without evidence, and you treat it as a scientific conclusion. I'll wager that if you find out where the particles came from, they're lab creations from cultures of dying cells that had no real 'virus' isolated from a sick person added at the beginning.
Which is why you started the article with the "well accepted" theme, and mocking the "virus deniers": because that's all you have, and something deep inside of you knows it.
It will be interesting to see which way you go, Dr. McCullough. You're in an interesting predicament of either conforming to what's "well accepted" in your field (which means telling the public that the 'vaccines' are good for them and everyone should go get boosted today) and keeping your prestigious professional standing, or recognizing that 'the emperor' has no clothes and is a pathological liar, and losing the establishment endorsement deal in order to find the inconvenient truths.
I wish you the best.
Hello Christine, I have been wondering where you were as I really enjoyed all the interesting things you have to say and how you say them. I nearly sent you a comment to ask if you were Ok, we would not know if something had happened.
You are a real warrior, courageous and walking the talk. Sending love, support and well wishes from South London, Uk
and thinking of you in the basement
xxx
Amazing work, lots of useful information, for anyone interested in hearing the truth.
Thank you, Christine!