Christine, unrelated question. Have you seen evidence the mRNA jabs actually produce "spike proteins?" Wondering what the extremely harmful agents are in the jabs.
Thanks for the response. :-) Dr. Sam Bailey's explanation makes the most sense—the spike is produced by the jabs but the spike itself is not from a virus as isolation of the virus is unproven as you well know.
I don't believe Sam has ever said that the spike protein is produced by the jabs? Her and Mark say that a class of spike proteins was shown to exist decades ago. But I don't think I've every heard them say that the jabs actually cause the body to produce them.
From the video I referenced at 5:40: "But can these spike proteins shed from the bodies of the injected and affect another person?"
Earlier in the video she explains the mechanism of the jabs with mRNA entering the cell via LNP's and then producing what she refers to as "the so-called spike protein," "so-called" in the sense that it is presented as the spike from a nonexistent virus.
She explained the official story about the jabs leading to spike protein, but I'm not sure that's even actually been demonstrated. And CDC had no records to show that the jabs cause the proteins.
Sep 18, 2023·edited Sep 18, 2023Liked by Christine Massey FOIs
Smythe got a bonus I suppose that’s why he’s chuckling, and his handlers assume that a large percent of people reading his tweets will just believe him so that it’s worth it regardless of your rebuttals and truths. As always impressive energy in your work!
Sounds like the top secret documents that prove viruses are real cannot be released because they are not written. A work in progress to prove viruses exist…haha, fantastic! Please continue to share these wonderfully absurd responses. Thank you Christine!
Totally understand Christine. One day soon we will have Common Law courts, then justice ⚖️ 👍 keep fighting for us, you're a brave fighter for freedom, Canadian's are very proud of you.
I am so grateful for your excellent knowledge and experience and your diligence for the truth in a world full of deception. So I will ask you for your thoughts on whether you would consider the opportunity to use Common Law processes and file a claim against the man/ woman who have caused you, woman, harm. I would consider this when a man/ woman who use social media or other forms of liablist action to cause harm to a professional reputation; deserves to be brought into a common law court. I am of this belief; to discredit the professional diligent work you brought to light in truth for science.
Thank you Lee. I am mulling this over :) I have major issues with the courts and am not sure if it would be worth it and don't want to get stuck being ordered to pay costs for the other side. If I had confidence in the courts, then for sure I would do it.
Tried to start my own substack....does not work...I give up. Here you can have it. You are the inspiration for it.
G.K. CHESTERTON
"Charlatans and Quacks" Feb. 15, 1908
“It is grossly unjust that the proof of a man being a humbug should be shifted from the question of whether he delivers the goods, to the quite secondary question of whether he advertises them too much. Surely the humbug is not the fellow who forces his wares upon you, but the decorous, dignified, really respectable gentleman who takes the money for them and decamps.“
Chesterton G.K.; Collected works.; Volume XXVIII: The Illustrated London News 1908-1910; c 1987 Ignatius Press; ISBN 0-89870-138-4 (PB)
2023 Interpretation: The real crime is not so much that the con-artist is guilty of his fraud, but in his method of coercion. The fraud is not the con-artist but rather, the respected agency profiting from it and making itself unaccountable.
'' The test works by using a fluorescent dye which targets the proteins present in the virus, the sample then travels in front of a viewing window which detects the fluorescent light and converts the result into an easy to understand result.''
On the contrary - I don't understand how anyone can go through the trouble of developing a test when they simply don't know what they're meant to be looking for.
Carl - I Think there's a need for a sophisticated testing regime for quite some time to come [Will he be receiving royalties from yet another fraudulent test?]
Exactly. Another unnecessary, fraud/delusion-based indirect test for a "virus" never shown to exist. No doubt Carl will profit from this one way or another.
Sep 17, 2023·edited Sep 21, 2023Liked by Christine Massey FOIs
You're welcome - right now the pandemic treaty is just around he corner with a tiny little window open to reject it - unfortunately most of what I can hear are crickets.
We have to realize that these treaties are nothing to do with us if we didn't sign onto them or give anyone power of attorney to sign us onto them. I know I didn't, so it's toilet paper as far as I'm concerned :)
I concur - we didn't sign them [ I'll have to remember that one]
The thing is that not many of us are trained and or experienced in the delicate art of resisting the uniformed.
The wording of the Pandemic treaty plus the following proposal by the West Australian government is alarming as the latter are planning on using force.
There was something about learning common law in ''The end of Covid series'' [I purchased access to the series not Common law]] - however learning about ''common law'' was reminiscent of the proverbial dangling carrot as it required an astronomical amount of money which I cannot justify since I have no income.
This is where you shine for the simple reason that you're willing to share what you know without asking for funds up front.
Fake photos of people falling dead- fake images of coffins piling up- fake doctors claiming hospitals were overflowing- fake travel nurses- fake whistleblowers- fake tests to produce a fake disease- fake scenes outside hospitals staged by PR firms- fake media parrots lying through their teeth every night- fake trials of a toxic bioweapon.
Sep 16, 2023·edited Sep 16, 2023Liked by Christine Massey FOIs
How about this Christine.
Spring 2020 NYC hospital data- peak census in-patient bed occupancy for the 10 week "spike" was right round 20,000. Hospital mortality for that time was right around 20,000- total was around 37,000 (care homes, at-home etc.).
So essentially what the data is telling us is that they killed every patient that was already in the hospital. Anyone think this happened? It didn't.
Not saying people didn't die then and there but not in the way nor at the volume being posited.
Keeping in mind this at a time of all-time record low admissions and bed rates and ICU rates.
Great work yet again Christine. I read the response of 'luke' - "providing you with advice and specialist guidance in an effort to ensure we provide you with a response, rather than providing you with ‘no information held’ which would be misleading for anybody who views that response." as actually admitting that they have no information to prove their claim. In legal terms that is a key phrase/admission. THE key admission.
Also, the 'announcement' by the company (Braveheart) that they had a new process to 'test' for a virus and 'live virus trials that then led to a huge rise in their stock price, says it all.
That is the way that this scam works.
Stock investors do not know of the entire absence of evidence, so believe that claims about viruses and tests are 'real'.
Cf all of 'Dr' Malone's claims and his income.
As I do not have to worry about claims made against me, I can say without hindrance that Elspeth, Luke and Carl are unmitigated liars, cheats and fraudsters.
Just a little aside here, but did you here about the Chinese Covid lab set up here near me just outside the town of Reedley, California? All is quiet! 🤫
Addendum (later on September 16, 2023):
I decided to write back to Luke for clarification of his response and am updating the article with the new communications (Luke responded already).
Christine, unrelated question. Have you seen evidence the mRNA jabs actually produce "spike proteins?" Wondering what the extremely harmful agents are in the jabs.
No, no evidence. Sorry I haven't kept up with the jab contents, and don't have any insight.
Thanks for the response. :-) Dr. Sam Bailey's explanation makes the most sense—the spike is produced by the jabs but the spike itself is not from a virus as isolation of the virus is unproven as you well know.
https://drsambailey.com/resources/videos/vaccines/shedding-vaccines-graphene-machines/
I don't believe Sam has ever said that the spike protein is produced by the jabs? Her and Mark say that a class of spike proteins was shown to exist decades ago. But I don't think I've every heard them say that the jabs actually cause the body to produce them.
From the video I referenced at 5:40: "But can these spike proteins shed from the bodies of the injected and affect another person?"
Earlier in the video she explains the mechanism of the jabs with mRNA entering the cell via LNP's and then producing what she refers to as "the so-called spike protein," "so-called" in the sense that it is presented as the spike from a nonexistent virus.
She explained the official story about the jabs leading to spike protein, but I'm not sure that's even actually been demonstrated. And CDC had no records to show that the jabs cause the proteins.
Smythe got a bonus I suppose that’s why he’s chuckling, and his handlers assume that a large percent of people reading his tweets will just believe him so that it’s worth it regardless of your rebuttals and truths. As always impressive energy in your work!
PS, your first "Symthe" is a typo.
Agreed, and thanks PM :)
Sounds like the top secret documents that prove viruses are real cannot be released because they are not written. A work in progress to prove viruses exist…haha, fantastic! Please continue to share these wonderfully absurd responses. Thank you Christine!
Totally understand Christine. One day soon we will have Common Law courts, then justice ⚖️ 👍 keep fighting for us, you're a brave fighter for freedom, Canadian's are very proud of you.
Warm regards
Lee
Greetings Christine,
I am so grateful for your excellent knowledge and experience and your diligence for the truth in a world full of deception. So I will ask you for your thoughts on whether you would consider the opportunity to use Common Law processes and file a claim against the man/ woman who have caused you, woman, harm. I would consider this when a man/ woman who use social media or other forms of liablist action to cause harm to a professional reputation; deserves to be brought into a common law court. I am of this belief; to discredit the professional diligent work you brought to light in truth for science.
Thank you Lee. I am mulling this over :) I have major issues with the courts and am not sure if it would be worth it and don't want to get stuck being ordered to pay costs for the other side. If I had confidence in the courts, then for sure I would do it.
Good stuff. Please keep us up to date about this ongoing mindfuckery from Luke, the smug turd.
As an example
bunch of shysters
Tried to start my own substack....does not work...I give up. Here you can have it. You are the inspiration for it.
G.K. CHESTERTON
"Charlatans and Quacks" Feb. 15, 1908
“It is grossly unjust that the proof of a man being a humbug should be shifted from the question of whether he delivers the goods, to the quite secondary question of whether he advertises them too much. Surely the humbug is not the fellow who forces his wares upon you, but the decorous, dignified, really respectable gentleman who takes the money for them and decamps.“
Chesterton G.K.; Collected works.; Volume XXVIII: The Illustrated London News 1908-1910; c 1987 Ignatius Press; ISBN 0-89870-138-4 (PB)
2023 Interpretation: The real crime is not so much that the con-artist is guilty of his fraud, but in his method of coercion. The fraud is not the con-artist but rather, the respected agency profiting from it and making itself unaccountable.
diapereddog
Carl is very happy to explain however he does this in the manner of someone telling fairy tale to a child.
Carl - People with the disease will have a signal. - [ signal..... what signal ?]
How does the paratec test measure a signal?
lets look this one up - I found that they'll collect a sample with the schwab stick up your nose - this... https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/news/university-sheffield-researchers-develop-quicker-more-accurate-covid-test
'' The test works by using a fluorescent dye which targets the proteins present in the virus, the sample then travels in front of a viewing window which detects the fluorescent light and converts the result into an easy to understand result.''
On the contrary - I don't understand how anyone can go through the trouble of developing a test when they simply don't know what they're meant to be looking for.
Carl - I Think there's a need for a sophisticated testing regime for quite some time to come [Will he be receiving royalties from yet another fraudulent test?]
In on breath they talk about "detection of INTACT PARTICLES", then next - just some proteins lol.
Thanks Finn.
Exactly. Another unnecessary, fraud/delusion-based indirect test for a "virus" never shown to exist. No doubt Carl will profit from this one way or another.
You're welcome - right now the pandemic treaty is just around he corner with a tiny little window open to reject it - unfortunately most of what I can hear are crickets.
The wording of the pandemic treaty is alarming.
We have to realize that these treaties are nothing to do with us if we didn't sign onto them or give anyone power of attorney to sign us onto them. I know I didn't, so it's toilet paper as far as I'm concerned :)
I concur - we didn't sign them [ I'll have to remember that one]
The thing is that not many of us are trained and or experienced in the delicate art of resisting the uniformed.
The wording of the Pandemic treaty plus the following proposal by the West Australian government is alarming as the latter are planning on using force.
From the Excess Deaths substack
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fdfedb67f-6881-4a90-b1fb-549915e4569a_2084x1509.jpeg
original post - https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/the-australian-government-may-legally
This is why I think one of the most valuable things ppl can do is start learning about law versus legalities/theatre.
There was something about learning common law in ''The end of Covid series'' [I purchased access to the series not Common law]] - however learning about ''common law'' was reminiscent of the proverbial dangling carrot as it required an astronomical amount of money which I cannot justify since I have no income.
This is where you shine for the simple reason that you're willing to share what you know without asking for funds up front.
Fake photos of people falling dead- fake images of coffins piling up- fake doctors claiming hospitals were overflowing- fake travel nurses- fake whistleblowers- fake tests to produce a fake disease- fake scenes outside hospitals staged by PR firms- fake media parrots lying through their teeth every night- fake trials of a toxic bioweapon.
Fake everything.
Bingo Allen.
How about this Christine.
Spring 2020 NYC hospital data- peak census in-patient bed occupancy for the 10 week "spike" was right round 20,000. Hospital mortality for that time was right around 20,000- total was around 37,000 (care homes, at-home etc.).
So essentially what the data is telling us is that they killed every patient that was already in the hospital. Anyone think this happened? It didn't.
Not saying people didn't die then and there but not in the way nor at the volume being posited.
Keeping in mind this at a time of all-time record low admissions and bed rates and ICU rates.
More on this later.
It seems to me that Carl Smyth is the UK's version of Elizabeth Holmes.
Great work yet again Christine. I read the response of 'luke' - "providing you with advice and specialist guidance in an effort to ensure we provide you with a response, rather than providing you with ‘no information held’ which would be misleading for anybody who views that response." as actually admitting that they have no information to prove their claim. In legal terms that is a key phrase/admission. THE key admission.
Also, the 'announcement' by the company (Braveheart) that they had a new process to 'test' for a virus and 'live virus trials that then led to a huge rise in their stock price, says it all.
That is the way that this scam works.
Stock investors do not know of the entire absence of evidence, so believe that claims about viruses and tests are 'real'.
Cf all of 'Dr' Malone's claims and his income.
As I do not have to worry about claims made against me, I can say without hindrance that Elspeth, Luke and Carl are unmitigated liars, cheats and fraudsters.
Pardon me but how did Dr Malone enter into this discussion?
He is a wolf in sheep's cloths going around talking to "Judicial Watch' and other 'trusted' outlets .... as if the 'virus' is real.
Just a little aside here, but did you here about the Chinese Covid lab set up here near me just outside the town of Reedley, California? All is quiet! 🤫
Truth does not mind being questioned.
A lie does not liked being challenged.
Seems to always be the case doesn’t it.
Christine. Thanks for battling on for us all.