I was un-muted and spoke for a minute or 2 before being cut off and muted as per the demand of Timothy Breen acting as "judge" (and kicked out altogether). Timothy heard me just fine and responded to me.
But on a recording there is no sound when I'm speaking. Everyone else can can be heard, no problem.
*****************
When the zoom session begins there will be a "warning" against recording. Yet "the court" will be recording, and since we're all equal under law, there is no valid reason why others should not record as well, imho.
Addendum:
I’ve sent a letter to the people acting as Clerk and Justice/Judge tomorrow, copied to "crown attorneys".
That is an interesting observation. Wonder how the court would respond to this double standard, especially since I doubt any of the accused gave their consent to be recorded.
EDIT: I heard you speaking, that is, until the 'judge' cut you off.
What, you're not yet used to LIES? I get lied about all da damn time, just because I don't COWER.
ha, I know you are going to be messed with, because the messing with is usually at the same level of the truthiness of the target-- So you get much messed with!
KEEP GOING!! (I do wish we could post photos on our comments, like on FB... That's the only thing I miss about that Nazi hole in the wall... VERY slick, b/c it's made and run by the CIA!
The judge "stayed" your proceedings without saying anything more. Does this mean the judge agrees to drop the charges against you and you are free to go?
Before the judge cut Christine off, I heard the judge say the case is 'stayed' and Christine is 'free to go'. But what you are saying is the court will hold this case over Christine's head, sort of like the sword of Damocles. If this is true then this does not come across as justice (not that there has been any justice from the start) and the optics suggest it is an intimidation tactic.
Justice? That court is for corporate matters only, so it is fraudulent from the get go. Not to mention several eye-witnesses, video and attending officer's notes contradicting the crown's argument of having a good case.
Christine and others who write about matters which should embarrass governments, the UK govt and the Australian have both passed laws about what can be perceived as misinformation or disinformation, and those who read or write it.
Particularly when it makes ridiculous their agendas.
I'm not sure how or whether this affects Substack, but thought it important enough to mention before there are casualties.
Stand without fear Christine. I hope you sue them for false arrest, harassment, fraud and whatever else they have perpetrated in this action.
Would a genuine case communicate between parties using the internet? Don't real court processes require the physical serving of proper legal documents?
Go Girl Go! You are my rock star and I am beyond grateful! Christine, for all that you are and all that you do, know that we love you! Thank you for your bravery and honesty. God has a special room in his heart for you!
Thank you, Christine! This is an excellent example of how one asserts their sovereign rights within the system. We are all learning more about this (purposefully) confounding system. I commend you for your efforts and willingness to share. Best of luck to you!
Stick it to 'em Christine! What a pack of lying turds this mob are. It must be contagious as they are attempting to run roughshod over people here in NZ too.
I think are really starting to panic now as so many people are seeing them for what they are, and asking questions they cannot answer.
Epidemic Preparedness Act 2006, section 24, says a judge can 'modify' court rules.
i am so worried about you Christine i am shocked heraing that you were handcuff WHAT ??????????----------- WHAT ?????????? i am really blank blank blank MAD --------and this Thomas Piggot character talk about scrapping the bottom scare bag city---------- Hopefully you and Amanda Vollermer and all the other WONDERFUL !!!!!!!!!! like mined people in Canada will move hear to Florida USA with me --------in the future i would have someone film everthing from an out of site location that way the police can :t take away your video evidence Good luck in the new norm
It was Jan. 2022 that I was handcuffed in relation to this matter. Tomorrow might have been an attempted trap to handcuff me again. We'll see what happens. Thank you Bradley. I'm ok right now.
Update, 3:30 pm Toronto time... starting to suspect that the matter was actually effectively withdrawn altogether... see my FB post here:
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=314373344731600&set=a.107538792081724
DID ANYONE HEAR ME SPEAKING OVER THE ZOOM CALL?
I was un-muted and spoke for a minute or 2 before being cut off and muted as per the demand of Timothy Breen acting as "judge" (and kicked out altogether). Timothy heard me just fine and responded to me.
But on a recording there is no sound when I'm speaking. Everyone else can can be heard, no problem.
*****************
When the zoom session begins there will be a "warning" against recording. Yet "the court" will be recording, and since we're all equal under law, there is no valid reason why others should not record as well, imho.
Addendum:
I’ve sent a letter to the people acting as Clerk and Justice/Judge tomorrow, copied to "crown attorneys".
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/2023-09-25-4-my-email-w-letter-attached-to-court-copied-to-crowns.pdf
Update: The man Timothy Breen who acts/does business as "Honourable Justice Timothy E. Breen" went along with all the b.s., and muted me.
So the alleged "charge" was "stayed" - which means they can resurrect the fake-matter later.
It's a ploy to 1) avoid trial and having all the b.s. exposed, and 2) to keep this hanging over my head and 3) continue damaging my reputation.
Cowards, all of 'em.
That is an interesting observation. Wonder how the court would respond to this double standard, especially since I doubt any of the accused gave their consent to be recorded.
EDIT: I heard you speaking, that is, until the 'judge' cut you off.
Thank you. Funny how on a recording everyone can be heard just fine.... except for me.
My experience is that they just refuse to discuss the issue - because they know they are unlawfully threatening people.
You're banned for the vulgar language, have a nice life.
Lol, you really think I'm going to download something at the prompting of someone who calls me a "cunt"?
Anyone can do a internet search and see that there is no "the" in the name of the actual court.
What, you're not yet used to LIES? I get lied about all da damn time, just because I don't COWER.
ha, I know you are going to be messed with, because the messing with is usually at the same level of the truthiness of the target-- So you get much messed with!
KEEP GOING!! (I do wish we could post photos on our comments, like on FB... That's the only thing I miss about that Nazi hole in the wall... VERY slick, b/c it's made and run by the CIA!
Woof!
Love ya, CM. ^_^
Thank you WH :) Cheers!
Thank you for your courage and integity Christine Massey.
Thank you Rider :)
Fraudulent charges, fraudulent court, fraudulent ending.
The judge "stayed" your proceedings without saying anything more. Does this mean the judge agrees to drop the charges against you and you are free to go?
No, it means he went along with all the b.s. And a "stay" means they can resurrect the fake-matter later.
It's a ploy to 1) avoid trial and having all the b.s. exposed, and 2) to keep this hanging over my head 3) continue damaging my reputation.
The case goes into limbo and 'they' can revisit it at any time. Records search apparently will still show the matter as well. Not nice.
Before the judge cut Christine off, I heard the judge say the case is 'stayed' and Christine is 'free to go'. But what you are saying is the court will hold this case over Christine's head, sort of like the sword of Damocles. If this is true then this does not come across as justice (not that there has been any justice from the start) and the optics suggest it is an intimidation tactic.
Bingo.
That's what i am to comprehend.
Justice? That court is for corporate matters only, so it is fraudulent from the get go. Not to mention several eye-witnesses, video and attending officer's notes contradicting the crown's argument of having a good case.
Christine and others who write about matters which should embarrass governments, the UK govt and the Australian have both passed laws about what can be perceived as misinformation or disinformation, and those who read or write it.
Particularly when it makes ridiculous their agendas.
I'm not sure how or whether this affects Substack, but thought it important enough to mention before there are casualties.
Stand without fear Christine. I hope you sue them for false arrest, harassment, fraud and whatever else they have perpetrated in this action.
Would a genuine case communicate between parties using the internet? Don't real court processes require the physical serving of proper legal documents?
Go Girl Go! You are my rock star and I am beyond grateful! Christine, for all that you are and all that you do, know that we love you! Thank you for your bravery and honesty. God has a special room in his heart for you!
Thank you, Christine! This is an excellent example of how one asserts their sovereign rights within the system. We are all learning more about this (purposefully) confounding system. I commend you for your efforts and willingness to share. Best of luck to you!
Martin Geddes in UK is going through similar shenanigans with his local tyrants.
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/you-must-defend-your-castle-from
Stay free Christine!
Stick it to 'em Christine! What a pack of lying turds this mob are. It must be contagious as they are attempting to run roughshod over people here in NZ too.
I think are really starting to panic now as so many people are seeing them for what they are, and asking questions they cannot answer.
Epidemic Preparedness Act 2006, section 24, says a judge can 'modify' court rules.
Will you comply?
nope
Will say a prayer and light a candle for you here in OR...best
i am so worried about you Christine i am shocked heraing that you were handcuff WHAT ??????????----------- WHAT ?????????? i am really blank blank blank MAD --------and this Thomas Piggot character talk about scrapping the bottom scare bag city---------- Hopefully you and Amanda Vollermer and all the other WONDERFUL !!!!!!!!!! like mined people in Canada will move hear to Florida USA with me --------in the future i would have someone film everthing from an out of site location that way the police can :t take away your video evidence Good luck in the new norm
It was Jan. 2022 that I was handcuffed in relation to this matter. Tomorrow might have been an attempted trap to handcuff me again. We'll see what happens. Thank you Bradley. I'm ok right now.
Will you go to this meeting?
I'm told I can attend via zoom, so might do that.