CDC admits: no scientific evidence of cowpox or Alaskapox "virus"... or contagion of symptoms

Greetings and Best Wishes,

Inspired by some recent “Alaskapox virus” fear-mongering from “public health experts” and the lamestream media…

… on February 12, 2024, I decided to file yet another FOIA request to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) to verify whether or not they have any valid scientific evidence to back up their “virus” claims.

I decided to cover the alleged “cowpox virus” in this request as well.

Someone at “Creative Biolabs” (key word: “creative”) claims that cowpox is contagious:

So I sought all studies/reports in the possession, custody or control of the people running the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and/or the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry that:

• scientifically prove/provide evidence for the existence of either alleged "virus" (showing that the alleged particle exists and causes the illness/symptoms that it's alleged to cause), and/or

• (if no “existence” records exist) describe purification of particles alleged to be said “viruses”, directly from bodily fluid/tissue/excrement of alleged "hosts" (with purification confirmed via EM imaging), and/or

• scientifically demonstrate contagion of symptom(s) allegedly caused by said alleged “viruses”.

I included a reminder that scientific proof/evidence requires use of the scientific method to test falsifiable hypotheses through valid, rigorous, repeatable controlled experiments.

And as always, I emphasized that I seek all such records held by these agencies regardless of whether they were authored by someone working there or elsewhere, and that if such records are held and are already publicly available, I require citations.

The Confession

February 29, 2024:

The final response letter from Roger Andoh acting as CDC/ATSDR FOIA Officer, Office of the Chief Operating Officer:

Roger confessed that none of the “experts” at either institution have even 1 responsive record:

“Personnel from CDC/ATSDR's National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID) conducted a search for records responsive to your request. Unfortunately, a search of our records failed to reveal any documents pertaining to your request.”

So there you have it - no scientific evidence of either purported “virus” (or contagion of symptoms).

The Distraction

Roger then went on to cite a useless, irrelevant, illogical, unscientific study involving the imaginary “Alaskapox virus” in order to give the impression that there really is convincing rational evidence of “its” existence:

“Per the NCEZID, years ago, a former CDC employee published an article concerning the Alaskapox virus and the URL is here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5447873.”

If you don’t mind the possibility that you might end up wanting to bang your head against a wall, go ahead and read this study with a critical eye and compare the methods that are so sketchily described by the authors to the scientific method.

The 2017 study supposedly reports on a “Novel Orthopoxvirus Infection in an Alaska Resident”, and begins with some fear-mongering around cessation of smallpox “vaccination” and the supposed waning of population-level “immunity”.

The authors then claim that a “virus” has been “isolated” from a woman’s dermal lesion “consistent with poxvirus infection” and that laboratory testing has “confirmed infection by an Orthopoxvirus”. The woman had been unwell for several days, suspected that she had been bit by spider and “denied” having been around any sick people.

The woman’s doctor suspected a “viral infection”, so he swabbed a vesicle, put the swab into universal transport media and sent the swab to the Alaska State Public Health Virology Laboratory for culture and diagnostic testing.

Testing at this point is obviously putting the cart before the horse because we’re looking for scientific evidence of a “virus” existing and you cannot have a validated test for something that hasn’t already been shown to exist.

Re “culture”/“isolation”: the content of the swab was intentionally, unscientifically adulterated by adding it to various cell lines. Other basic details of the “culturing” process were omitted/concealed by the authors and they don’t even hint at having implemented any controls (because virology isn’t a science).

The cell lines started breaking down (“cytopathic effects”), probably caused by malnutrition/poisoning since this is the norm in virology, and this was irrationally, ludicrously passed off as a “virus” having been “isolated”.

Two weeks later the original swab sample and the fake “isolates” were sent to the Poxvirus Laboratory of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention where a never-validated “Orthopoxvirus-generic” PCR test gave meaningless “positive” results.

(PCR can only provide indirect evidence of a target sequence, not intact “germs”, and no “orthopoxvirus” has ever been shown to exist anyways.)

Tiny things were seen in electron microscopy images after the culturing had been done (not in the contents of the swab). These tiny things were delusionally passed off as “the virus isolated from the patient”… despite the fact that nothing whatsoever had been isolated/purified let alone sequenced, characterized and studied with valid controlled experiments to see if it really was a “virus”. The classic “point and declare” method, minus the arrows.

From the Supplementary Methods we see that fake/fraudulent “whole genome sequencing” was based on DNA extracted from the original cell culture (and God only knows how many different sequences) - which was never shown to have anything to do with a “virus” - and meaningless “phylogenetic inference” was performed.

The authors don’t provide details of the universal transport medium that the swab was stored in prior to any lab work being performed. However we know that the CDC’s Standard Operating Procedure for “viral” transport medium in the context of fake-covid includes the intentional, unscientific adulteration of clinical samples with cow serum, toxic drugs, etc. (screenshot below) and that universal transport mediums can adulterate clinical samples with bovine serum albumin, antibiotics, etc. (i.e. see Copan Diagnostics Inc., Murrieta, CA, USA.)

There’s more but I trust you get the picture: no valid independent or dependent variable, un-validated indirect tests, invalid methods that tell us nothing about living bodies, no scientific evidence.

Communications and full CDC / ATSDR confession:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/CDC-Alaskapox-cowpox-virus-existence-contagion-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf

Related:

***New book: The Final Pandemic - Drs. Sam and Mark Bailey***

Dr. Mark Bailey re the new book: 'The Final Pandemic' — PWFM interview with Eric Francis

Webinar with Dr. Mark Bailey re the new book — Dr. Tom Cowan webinar February 29, 2024

ViroLIEgy 101: The Scientific Method — Mike Stone
Scientific knowledge cannot exist without it.

The Case Against Polio Contagion — Aldhissla
The most comprehensive collection of studies attesting the non-contagiousness of polio.

The NOCA (Notice of Conditional Acceptance) To Knockout The Tuberculosis Scamdemic — Michael O’Bernicia

The role of Bacteria — DANNI MØLLER
True Biology

Dr. Tom Cowan water webinar - February 28, 2024

Action4Canada Begging For More Money For “Mystery” Lawsuits — Canuck Law

FOIs Summary

Freedom of Information Responses reveal that health/science institutions around the world (220 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 (the alleged convid virus) isolation/purification, anywhere, ever:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/

Excel file listing 220 institutions:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Institution-list-for-website.xls

FOI responses re other imaginary viruses (HIV, avian influenza, HPV, Influenza, Measles, etc., etc., etc.):
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-have-no-record-of-any-virus-having-been-isolated-purified-virology-isnt-a-science/

FOIs re secretive and unscientifically "mock infected" cells (aka invalid controls) and fabricated "virus genomes":
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/do-virologists-perform-valid-control-experiments-is-virology-a-science/

3000+ pages of "virus" FOIs (updated as of December 31, 2022) in 8 compilation pdfs, and my notarized declaration re the anti-scientific nature of virology:
https://tinyurl.com/IsolationFOIs

Failed freedom of Information responses re contagion:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/freedom-of-information-responses-re-contagion/

Do health and science institutions have studies proving that bacteria CAUSE disease?
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/do-health-authorities-have-studies-proving-that-bacteria-cause-disease-lets-find-out-via-freedom-of-information/

Because "they" (HIV, influenza virus, HPV, measles virus, etc., etc., etc.) have never been shown to exist, clearly don't exist and virology isn't a science.

For truth, freedom and sanity,
Christine