But, you see, you are clinging to the old model of science. These guys are in on The Science, which does not require scientific proof, it only requires consensus, a.k.a. "peer review".
The robotic bureaucrat responding to the FOI request wants to say "viruses cannot exist outside a host" but resorts to "cannot grow" instead; because somewhere in their muddled, programmed mind there is a conflict: saying "cannot exist outside a host" would make it difficult to support the story that these things can float around in the open air unharmed by solar radiation, swim in sewage sludge unharmed by bleach and surfactants, and "infect" other people, like demonic nano-xenomorphs from outer space.
Unfortunately, banging on about virus isolation is not the correct way to destroy virology because they have the answer to confuse the lay folks trying to understand all this: they will either show you some micsoscope photos of particles, or tell you smugly that you don't understand that it is not technically possible to isolate viruses so your ignorance on the subject invalidates your arguments.
No, the way to attack this charade is to continue pressing for proof of pathogenicity. They will find and show you particles if you ask for particles but they cannot prove that they cause disease in human beings, and that is the way to defeat these parasites intellectually/ scientifically.
the powers that were lied about everything! thank you for this article, you should get intouch with Dr Sam Bailey and do an interview together, when we saw this article we subscribed to your blog!!! Thank you for helping quench the fire of fear with the water of truth!
So one has to ponder what was killing people in 2020 if not a novel virus? The world's only two official covid inquiries to reveal the truth to the lockdown have answers and you will be hard pushed to find ANY articles about any of this on ANY media or popular critic website.
but good luck opening it! the powers that were, have started to sensor it on line, I suggest if you tried to open it use other search engine that is not google!! here is another link:
It was voodoo that was " killing people in 2020". It is possible to kill people who cannot block your mesages by repeatedly telling them in a very convincing manner that they WILL get ill and die.
What a surprise. The UK Health Security Agency doesn't have the proofs that no other global health entity has. 🤣 Still, great to get ever more such official admissions. Makes our case that much more overwhelming. Thanks once again, Christine.
Foia's in most countries have shown the same results. My question is, how do you have a pandemic when you have no evidence of a virus? And so this proves again that it was a hoax. There was most likely a pathogen release that was made in a biolab. This is one reason that Putin went into Ukraine as they had 40 to 50 biolabs in the Ukraine.
Imagine a dead virus somehow coming to life if it can find a host. Life from death. Shouldn't the creatures of science be all over this? All the billionaires, deep staters and otherwise creepy cowards will be salivating at the thought of living forever.
Of course, it is all a loony tune as viruses do not exist and germ theory is pure poppycock. But the multi-trillion dollar medical mafia demands we believe their every lie.
Scene: A quaint little shop, shelves gleaming with rows of glass vials, test tubes, and microscopes. A bell jingles as a customer steps inside, clutching a vial. Behind the counter stands a cheerful shopkeeper in a crisp lab coat.
Customer: [Cheerfully] Good morning!
Shopkeeper: [Beaming from behind the counter] Good morning, sir! How can I assist you today?
Customer: [Excitedly] I’d like to purchase a complete virus isolation, please.
Shopkeeper: [Enthusiastically rubbing hands together] A complete virus isolation? Excellent choice, sir! [Leans in conspiratorially] Now, what sort of isolation were you after?
Customer: [Confidently] Well, I was hoping for something ‘standard’ - actual viral particles, properly purified, and scientifically demonstrated to be contagious.
Shopkeeper: [Nodding eagerly] Ah, yes, of course. We do a splendid line in virus isolation [Flashes a cheeky, exaggerated wink] Let me just check our stock. [Glances down at a register filled with papers]
Customer: [Patiently] I do hope you’ve got some. I’ve had quite a time finding and actual viral isolate, you see.
Shopkeeper: [Looks up with a mischievous grin] Well, we do indeed have isolation techniques, but… when you say, “actual viral particles,” are you quite sure you don’t just mean fragments of 'RNA' in a delightful toxic soup of other materials?
Customer: [Frowning] No, no! I mean the entire, fully intact virus! Purified and separated from all the other cellular debris, proteins, and 'genetic' material. You know, the real deal – something I can see and say, “Aha! There’s the virus!”
Shopkeeper: [Laughing nervously, scratching his head] Oh dear! I’m afraid we don’t get much funding – I mean call for – fully intact viral particles these days. We specialize more in… how should I put it… theoretical isolates! [Gestures grandly] Little bits of 'RNA' found in a petri dish - absolutely delightful for PCR tests!
Customer: [Surprised] Theoretical isolates? That’s not the same at all! I want an actual virus – completely isolated from all other material.
Shopkeeper: [Brightens] Ah, well! You’ll be delighted to know we do have something close! It’s called virus culture supernatant! [Beaming] We grow cells in a dish, mix them with all sorts of enzymes and toxic substances, and then, once the cells are thoroughly broken down by the toxins, we proudly declare the presence of a virus!
Customer: [Frustrated, throwing up hands] But I don’t want a toxic soup! I want the virus itself, isolated!
Shopkeeper: [Nods thoughtfully] Ah, I see. How about this – let’s extract some 'genetic' fragments from your soup and amplify them with PCR! Then you can then claim you’ve isolated a virus!
Customer: [Sighing, shaking head] No, no, that’s not the same as actual purification. You must have something free of contaminants, cellular debris – just the virus itself. It’s well Past – eurrhh – due for that. Bloody hell, you’ve had 200 years to get it right!
Shopkeeper: [Looking thoughtful] Hmmm, tricky… I think the closest we have is our hypothetical model virus! A computer-generated sequence based on theoretical constructs. [Puffs up with pride] Best in the business!
Customer: [Annoyed] A computer model? I don’t want a hypothetical virus! I want a real, honest-to-goodness, isolated virus – in full form!
Shopkeeper: [Apologetic] Oh, dear. We don’t carry those kinds of isolates, I’m afraid. Not much call for them. How about some cytopathic effects instead? [Winking] We add a little poison to the cells, they start dying, and you can call that proof of viral activity!
Customer: [Fuming] But that doesn’t prove there’s a virus! That just proves the cells are poisoned!
Shopkeeper: [Nodding, grinning] Quite right! Clever of you to notice, sir. Still, very popular!
Customer: [Upset] This is ridiculous! Every time I ask for virus isolation, you offer me everything but an actual virus!
Shopkeeper: [Cheerfully] Oh! We do have [Winks, cheekily] ‘viral’ fragments! Yes, tiny little bits of 'RNA' – might even be from a ‘virus!’ We extract them from all sorts of cellular debris! Very trendy!
Customer: [Exploding] I don’t want fragments, I don’t want toxic soup, I don’t want computer models! I just want a single, complete isolated virus! Do you, or do you, not have one?
Shopkeeper: [Smiling warmly] Well, technically… no, we don’t. Never had one in stock.
Customer: [Shocked, eyes wide] Never? Not one actual isolated virus?
Shopkeeper: [Beaming] Not a single one! But we do have hypothetical constructs! We even have virus-shaped plush toys if you’d like something more tangible!
Customer: [Sarcastic] Wonderful. A toy. Just what I needed.
Shopkeeper: [Earnestly] Oh, and if you’re still set on isolation, may I interest you in some exciting virology jargon? Comes with [Flashes, exaggerated, cheeky wink] every ‘isolate.’
Customer: [Throwing hands up in exasperation] This is preposterous! I came in here expecting proper science, and all I’ve gotten is fancy words, random soup, and hypothetical nonsense!
Shopkeeper: [Shrugging] Well, sir, that’s just the world of virus isolation these days! No one actually has a fully isolated virus, you see. But we make it sound rather convincing, don’t we?
Customer: [Storming out, shaking head] I can’t believe this! The search for an isolated virus continues!
Shopkeeper: [Calling after him] Come back any time! Maybe next week we’ll have some new fragments in stock!
The shop bell jingles violently as the customer slams the door behind him. The shopkeeper watches him go, unfazed, still humming a cheerful tune. He picks up a plush virus toy, gives it a playful squeeze, and grins.
Shopkeeper: [Chuckling to himself] Ah well… another satisfied customer! [Sets the plush toy back on the shelf] Now, where was I? Ah yes… preparing the next batch of theoretical isolates!
He whistles as he flips open a thick viroLIEgy manual, its pages filled with colourful flowcharts, PCR protocols, and footnotes leading to nowhere.
I love these little sketches! Virology 'science' as theatre and spectacle. Just don't be fooled by the misdirection. Virology is akin to the 'Dead Parrot' sketch in Monty Python, with the parrot replaced by in vitro culture observation and cytopathic effect (CPE). There appears to be no end to this farce; each time the doorbell jingles, the 'parrot as isolate' is presented anew. Britain once had its Whitehall farces with Brian Rix, where audiences roared at every rehearsed stage trick. In virology, the 'soup cocktail' is the punchline; each time it is brought onto the stage, the researchers go wild over their latest 'viral agent.'
The next sketch? The doorbell chimes and a 'novel virus' - the parrot’s sibling, the avian flu - is ushered in. The final act of the "No he’s not dead, he’s, resting" trilogy reveals the wizardry of genetic sequencing, where the in silico computer production is unveiled. Nature is neither consulted nor needed at any stage of this algorithmic sequence-alignment farce.
To say "this parrot is dead" is an understatement: the creature never existed in the first place. There is no need to let evidence get in the way of an industrial-scale Mafia shakedown, after all. And just like attending a theatre production, one can neither be shown nor take a photograph of the alleged star of the show: 'Polly the Genome.'
LOL 😂 Tempting! After decades of stitching up customers with fake virus sales pitches and toxic products, it would be just desserts in many eyes — but Christine’s 300+ FOIAs do more damage than either of our punchlines ever could.
There are currently two varieties of Renegade MD's. 99% crow about Covidiocy and rightly so, however they refuse to review the "virus" indoctrination. Merly Nass and Lee Merritt among them. The brightest bulbs in the room expose the entire fraud for what it has always been.
Maloney is a "virologist" now a turncoat but says nothing about his allegiance.
The entire house of cards is crumbling. Thanks for sounding the alarm, there are an increasing # of us... Both lay people and professionals.
I recently read some drivel from some webpage (I wish I had saved) that claimed that virologists didn’t need to isolate any virus because they had already mapped out their genes. (?!) How can anyone map out genes if you don’t have “the thing” in the first place?? And I want to see proof that they can map ANY genes.
As far as I understood the Bechamp book I read years ago, that is what he describes. Particles in our bodies, that are working, and others that are dead and are being transported off.
When I was a kid everyone knew you caught a cold by standing sweaty in a cold draft. That the nape of the neck is a very sensitive spot for that.
The only picture online I have seen from the cvd was on Geoff Pain's Substack. It was a photo through an electron microscope, and stated, that this was what caused the disease. I have read the 40+ years experiments in the UK where they tried to make healthy people get a cold. I still think there are germs that transmit (I had it 3 times, supposedly flu, when I caught something from being close to a sick person. But I also have been in houses where everyone was sick and I did not get it. )
A dear friend of mine recently bought a book just to show my unbelieving self (regarding viruses) that viruses have been “seen” by an electron microscope in 1953. The black-and-white photo was a blackish background with some tiny fuzzy dots on it. I laughed out loud! I said that’s a photo of who knows what, but that is most certainly not proof of any virus! It’s just a photo of “something” with a label on it.
Mind you, he has a PhD and has used electron microscopes and knows the process for using them. I asked him how, if one pointed to an object under the metal plating, would you be able to remove it and test it, using controlled studies, to see if it could cause any illness and then repeat the study? I said you cannot! It’s ludicrous to think it’s possible. He is unable to change his beliefs and that’s that.
It is my understanding that every attempt to prove contagion has failed. There are multiple reasons why people become ill but we have been trained to believe that it’s one thing.
I think it’s reasonable to believe that bacteria, fungi, and the like are scavengers rather than instigators. We have bacteria all over our bodies but they seem to only become a problem after some form of trauma. This follows entropy and atrophy “rules” in that bacteria are recyclers, breaking down tissue to make products to support other life forms. Entropy (growth) and atrophy (recycling). There needs to be materials available to support new growth. It’s the cycle of life.
The environment has a great impact on our health, and because we are multiple bodies (spiritual, emotional, mental, and physical) occupying essentially the same space, those are also part of our environment. Our minds can make us ill as well.
Bacteria can produce toxic waste and that can create illness or possibly death, depending upon the circumstances. So, as I understand it, that can create illness as a byproduct from bacteria if it overwhelms the organism. If this is incorrect, I appreciate feedback.
sounds logical to me, but of course I am not medically schooled. I just think of how our body reacts when we get bitten or stung by insects, scorpions, snakes... we can also get sick, I think, from funghi, and some you can eat only once!
But, you see, you are clinging to the old model of science. These guys are in on The Science, which does not require scientific proof, it only requires consensus, a.k.a. "peer review".
The robotic bureaucrat responding to the FOI request wants to say "viruses cannot exist outside a host" but resorts to "cannot grow" instead; because somewhere in their muddled, programmed mind there is a conflict: saying "cannot exist outside a host" would make it difficult to support the story that these things can float around in the open air unharmed by solar radiation, swim in sewage sludge unharmed by bleach and surfactants, and "infect" other people, like demonic nano-xenomorphs from outer space.
Unfortunately, banging on about virus isolation is not the correct way to destroy virology because they have the answer to confuse the lay folks trying to understand all this: they will either show you some micsoscope photos of particles, or tell you smugly that you don't understand that it is not technically possible to isolate viruses so your ignorance on the subject invalidates your arguments.
No, the way to attack this charade is to continue pressing for proof of pathogenicity. They will find and show you particles if you ask for particles but they cannot prove that they cause disease in human beings, and that is the way to defeat these parasites intellectually/ scientifically.
the science of belief has certainly lent itself towards great strides forward in the belief of science...
the vast majority of Viruses that have destroyed the well being of the Inhabitants of this Adobe of time and space, were man made.
what does that say about the Humans of your adobe?
the powers that were lied about everything! thank you for this article, you should get intouch with Dr Sam Bailey and do an interview together, when we saw this article we subscribed to your blog!!! Thank you for helping quench the fire of fear with the water of truth!
Except you can view it under a microscope
So one has to ponder what was killing people in 2020 if not a novel virus? The world's only two official covid inquiries to reveal the truth to the lockdown have answers and you will be hard pushed to find ANY articles about any of this on ANY media or popular critic website.
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiryfeature
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/exclusiveuk-covid-19-inquiry-bereaved?utm_source=publication-search
graphene oxide my friend, injected graphene oxide, that is what killed people and continue to kill people - silent poison killer, check this website:
https://www.laquintacolumna.net/
but good luck opening it! the powers that were, have started to sensor it on line, I suggest if you tried to open it use other search engine that is not google!! here is another link:
https://falkentheater.substack.com/p/laboratory-proof-graphene-nanotech
Not in 2020 it didn't. I posted links to show what did.
It was voodoo that was " killing people in 2020". It is possible to kill people who cannot block your mesages by repeatedly telling them in a very convincing manner that they WILL get ill and die.
What a surprise. The UK Health Security Agency doesn't have the proofs that no other global health entity has. 🤣 Still, great to get ever more such official admissions. Makes our case that much more overwhelming. Thanks once again, Christine.
Foia's in most countries have shown the same results. My question is, how do you have a pandemic when you have no evidence of a virus? And so this proves again that it was a hoax. There was most likely a pathogen release that was made in a biolab. This is one reason that Putin went into Ukraine as they had 40 to 50 biolabs in the Ukraine.
I’m pretty sure foias in ALL countries have shown the same results, all amounting to nothing really.
Here are a couple vids I think you’ll appreciate…on “pathogens” and “bioweapons”.
https://drsambailey.com/resources/videos/germ-theory/why-pathogens-dont-exist/
https://drsambailey.com/resources/videos/viruses-unplugged/bioweapons-bs/
It will be GREAT when this Truth becomes known globally. I do believe that day is coming sooner than later.👍🏽💖
Imagine a dead virus somehow coming to life if it can find a host. Life from death. Shouldn't the creatures of science be all over this? All the billionaires, deep staters and otherwise creepy cowards will be salivating at the thought of living forever.
Of course, it is all a loony tune as viruses do not exist and germ theory is pure poppycock. But the multi-trillion dollar medical mafia demands we believe their every lie.
It is true in Biology that certain organisms under the right conditions
enter a suspended state.
Since "virus" has satistied no biological metrics can be said to not exist.
As you conclude follow the $$$.
Scene: A quaint little shop, shelves gleaming with rows of glass vials, test tubes, and microscopes. A bell jingles as a customer steps inside, clutching a vial. Behind the counter stands a cheerful shopkeeper in a crisp lab coat.
Customer: [Cheerfully] Good morning!
Shopkeeper: [Beaming from behind the counter] Good morning, sir! How can I assist you today?
Customer: [Excitedly] I’d like to purchase a complete virus isolation, please.
Shopkeeper: [Enthusiastically rubbing hands together] A complete virus isolation? Excellent choice, sir! [Leans in conspiratorially] Now, what sort of isolation were you after?
Customer: [Confidently] Well, I was hoping for something ‘standard’ - actual viral particles, properly purified, and scientifically demonstrated to be contagious.
Shopkeeper: [Nodding eagerly] Ah, yes, of course. We do a splendid line in virus isolation [Flashes a cheeky, exaggerated wink] Let me just check our stock. [Glances down at a register filled with papers]
Customer: [Patiently] I do hope you’ve got some. I’ve had quite a time finding and actual viral isolate, you see.
Shopkeeper: [Looks up with a mischievous grin] Well, we do indeed have isolation techniques, but… when you say, “actual viral particles,” are you quite sure you don’t just mean fragments of 'RNA' in a delightful toxic soup of other materials?
Customer: [Frowning] No, no! I mean the entire, fully intact virus! Purified and separated from all the other cellular debris, proteins, and 'genetic' material. You know, the real deal – something I can see and say, “Aha! There’s the virus!”
Shopkeeper: [Laughing nervously, scratching his head] Oh dear! I’m afraid we don’t get much funding – I mean call for – fully intact viral particles these days. We specialize more in… how should I put it… theoretical isolates! [Gestures grandly] Little bits of 'RNA' found in a petri dish - absolutely delightful for PCR tests!
Customer: [Surprised] Theoretical isolates? That’s not the same at all! I want an actual virus – completely isolated from all other material.
Shopkeeper: [Brightens] Ah, well! You’ll be delighted to know we do have something close! It’s called virus culture supernatant! [Beaming] We grow cells in a dish, mix them with all sorts of enzymes and toxic substances, and then, once the cells are thoroughly broken down by the toxins, we proudly declare the presence of a virus!
Customer: [Frustrated, throwing up hands] But I don’t want a toxic soup! I want the virus itself, isolated!
Shopkeeper: [Nods thoughtfully] Ah, I see. How about this – let’s extract some 'genetic' fragments from your soup and amplify them with PCR! Then you can then claim you’ve isolated a virus!
Customer: [Sighing, shaking head] No, no, that’s not the same as actual purification. You must have something free of contaminants, cellular debris – just the virus itself. It’s well Past – eurrhh – due for that. Bloody hell, you’ve had 200 years to get it right!
Shopkeeper: [Looking thoughtful] Hmmm, tricky… I think the closest we have is our hypothetical model virus! A computer-generated sequence based on theoretical constructs. [Puffs up with pride] Best in the business!
Customer: [Annoyed] A computer model? I don’t want a hypothetical virus! I want a real, honest-to-goodness, isolated virus – in full form!
Shopkeeper: [Apologetic] Oh, dear. We don’t carry those kinds of isolates, I’m afraid. Not much call for them. How about some cytopathic effects instead? [Winking] We add a little poison to the cells, they start dying, and you can call that proof of viral activity!
Customer: [Fuming] But that doesn’t prove there’s a virus! That just proves the cells are poisoned!
Shopkeeper: [Nodding, grinning] Quite right! Clever of you to notice, sir. Still, very popular!
Customer: [Upset] This is ridiculous! Every time I ask for virus isolation, you offer me everything but an actual virus!
Shopkeeper: [Cheerfully] Oh! We do have [Winks, cheekily] ‘viral’ fragments! Yes, tiny little bits of 'RNA' – might even be from a ‘virus!’ We extract them from all sorts of cellular debris! Very trendy!
Customer: [Exploding] I don’t want fragments, I don’t want toxic soup, I don’t want computer models! I just want a single, complete isolated virus! Do you, or do you, not have one?
Shopkeeper: [Smiling warmly] Well, technically… no, we don’t. Never had one in stock.
Customer: [Shocked, eyes wide] Never? Not one actual isolated virus?
Shopkeeper: [Beaming] Not a single one! But we do have hypothetical constructs! We even have virus-shaped plush toys if you’d like something more tangible!
Customer: [Sarcastic] Wonderful. A toy. Just what I needed.
Shopkeeper: [Earnestly] Oh, and if you’re still set on isolation, may I interest you in some exciting virology jargon? Comes with [Flashes, exaggerated, cheeky wink] every ‘isolate.’
Customer: [Throwing hands up in exasperation] This is preposterous! I came in here expecting proper science, and all I’ve gotten is fancy words, random soup, and hypothetical nonsense!
Shopkeeper: [Shrugging] Well, sir, that’s just the world of virus isolation these days! No one actually has a fully isolated virus, you see. But we make it sound rather convincing, don’t we?
Customer: [Storming out, shaking head] I can’t believe this! The search for an isolated virus continues!
Shopkeeper: [Calling after him] Come back any time! Maybe next week we’ll have some new fragments in stock!
The shop bell jingles violently as the customer slams the door behind him. The shopkeeper watches him go, unfazed, still humming a cheerful tune. He picks up a plush virus toy, gives it a playful squeeze, and grins.
Shopkeeper: [Chuckling to himself] Ah well… another satisfied customer! [Sets the plush toy back on the shelf] Now, where was I? Ah yes… preparing the next batch of theoretical isolates!
He whistles as he flips open a thick viroLIEgy manual, its pages filled with colourful flowcharts, PCR protocols, and footnotes leading to nowhere.
I love these little sketches! Virology 'science' as theatre and spectacle. Just don't be fooled by the misdirection. Virology is akin to the 'Dead Parrot' sketch in Monty Python, with the parrot replaced by in vitro culture observation and cytopathic effect (CPE). There appears to be no end to this farce; each time the doorbell jingles, the 'parrot as isolate' is presented anew. Britain once had its Whitehall farces with Brian Rix, where audiences roared at every rehearsed stage trick. In virology, the 'soup cocktail' is the punchline; each time it is brought onto the stage, the researchers go wild over their latest 'viral agent.'
The next sketch? The doorbell chimes and a 'novel virus' - the parrot’s sibling, the avian flu - is ushered in. The final act of the "No he’s not dead, he’s, resting" trilogy reveals the wizardry of genetic sequencing, where the in silico computer production is unveiled. Nature is neither consulted nor needed at any stage of this algorithmic sequence-alignment farce.
To say "this parrot is dead" is an understatement: the creature never existed in the first place. There is no need to let evidence get in the way of an industrial-scale Mafia shakedown, after all. And just like attending a theatre production, one can neither be shown nor take a photograph of the alleged star of the show: 'Polly the Genome.'
Bring back John Cleese
You’re too much!🤣 I picture a lengthy cartoon version across the landscape of all media..👏👏Burke Breathed inspired of course!
Haaaahahahaaa! 👏👏👏. But I was hoping the Customer would end with “Well ’m sorry, but I’m afraid I must shoot you.”
LOL 😂 Tempting! After decades of stitching up customers with fake virus sales pitches and toxic products, it would be just desserts in many eyes — but Christine’s 300+ FOIAs do more damage than either of our punchlines ever could.
Awesome factscinator! When I read this, I picture it in my mind, almost like a movie. You certainly have the touch - and the facts.
Massive thanks for the kind feedback — truly appreciated 👍👍 🎉
There are currently two varieties of Renegade MD's. 99% crow about Covidiocy and rightly so, however they refuse to review the "virus" indoctrination. Merly Nass and Lee Merritt among them. The brightest bulbs in the room expose the entire fraud for what it has always been.
Maloney is a "virologist" now a turncoat but says nothing about his allegiance.
The entire house of cards is crumbling. Thanks for sounding the alarm, there are an increasing # of us... Both lay people and professionals.
I recently read some drivel from some webpage (I wish I had saved) that claimed that virologists didn’t need to isolate any virus because they had already mapped out their genes. (?!) How can anyone map out genes if you don’t have “the thing” in the first place?? And I want to see proof that they can map ANY genes.
accurate observation, the fraud is ultra apparent
Medical Doctors have a conundrum. Admit they were indoctrinated
and expose the fraud or continue to side step. We are there.
You know how they say our bodies are made of viruses in our DNA?
That's because what they detect as virus is actually dead cell debris.
These idiots love pseudoscientific tech like genetics which heavily relies on PCR which itself is a delusion.
If running cycles creates noise, it's not an exact copy. So they're testing false data.
https://robc137.substack.com/p/pcr-fails-logic-from-the-start-sorry
Genetics is definitely a mixed bag.
Medelian genetics is the science of hybridization.
That underpinning is reproducible.
As you point out the PCR test is positive for anything when
"turned up" cycled enough times.
As far as I understood the Bechamp book I read years ago, that is what he describes. Particles in our bodies, that are working, and others that are dead and are being transported off.
When I was a kid everyone knew you caught a cold by standing sweaty in a cold draft. That the nape of the neck is a very sensitive spot for that.
The only picture online I have seen from the cvd was on Geoff Pain's Substack. It was a photo through an electron microscope, and stated, that this was what caused the disease. I have read the 40+ years experiments in the UK where they tried to make healthy people get a cold. I still think there are germs that transmit (I had it 3 times, supposedly flu, when I caught something from being close to a sick person. But I also have been in houses where everyone was sick and I did not get it. )
Have confronted Virus seeking MD's about whether they have ever "gandered"
down an electron microscope. Instead of coming up for air they love to counter with doublespeak jargon and leave. These people at this late date know
they were lied to, and perpetuated the fraud.
A dear friend of mine recently bought a book just to show my unbelieving self (regarding viruses) that viruses have been “seen” by an electron microscope in 1953. The black-and-white photo was a blackish background with some tiny fuzzy dots on it. I laughed out loud! I said that’s a photo of who knows what, but that is most certainly not proof of any virus! It’s just a photo of “something” with a label on it.
Mind you, he has a PhD and has used electron microscopes and knows the process for using them. I asked him how, if one pointed to an object under the metal plating, would you be able to remove it and test it, using controlled studies, to see if it could cause any illness and then repeat the study? I said you cannot! It’s ludicrous to think it’s possible. He is unable to change his beliefs and that’s that.
As you point out, well meaning people offer distorted images as proof when its not even evidence. They are well indoctrinated.
The good news is that fools move as fish in a school. No one really knows why. The Medical Cartel has failed miserably.
We cannot be aware of what is beyond our awareness. ~Tom Campbell
We can't evolve ahead of ourselves. ~Me
What is it -- luck, Grace, karma -- that allows some of us to see logic, truth?
Word dissection: Evolve. Has love spelt backward.
Here is the package / Knowledge / Wisdom / Discernment
We have a lifetime to unpack the details.
Good question. It took me a while. I was fortunate to have some intelligent brothers who persisted on clueing me in. I eventually got it.
the pic I saw was all but clear also.
It is my understanding that every attempt to prove contagion has failed. There are multiple reasons why people become ill but we have been trained to believe that it’s one thing.
I think it’s reasonable to believe that bacteria, fungi, and the like are scavengers rather than instigators. We have bacteria all over our bodies but they seem to only become a problem after some form of trauma. This follows entropy and atrophy “rules” in that bacteria are recyclers, breaking down tissue to make products to support other life forms. Entropy (growth) and atrophy (recycling). There needs to be materials available to support new growth. It’s the cycle of life.
The environment has a great impact on our health, and because we are multiple bodies (spiritual, emotional, mental, and physical) occupying essentially the same space, those are also part of our environment. Our minds can make us ill as well.
And, we are connected to everything else.
Sort of. Bacteria do in fact comply with Koch's postulates.
Virus none of them. Important not to conflate "virus" with other
microbe to include fungi.
Toenail fungus can be a problem and that is why I included it. Otherwise, there are many benefits or detriments, depending on the situation, etc.
Very difficult to generalize about bacteria. Some are pathogenic in concentration, others commensal (no one knows)
Once fugus sets up housekeeping UNDERNEATH the nail bed extremely difficult to eradicate however there is some limited success.
This must be one of the best and shortest way of explaining germs! I am going to keep your comment for future use. Thanks!
PS. I think if germs were killers, we would all be long dead.
Dr Tom Cowan has good explanations too! This is from his weekly LIVESTREAMs from Jan 14 and Jan 7.
https://drtomcowan.com/blogs/the-new-biology-learning-center/lets-take-a-look-at-money-did-marshall-fulfill-kochs-postulates-1-14-26
Jan 7 - https://drtomcowan.com/blogs/the-new-biology-learning-center/what-questions-are-you-thinking-about-as-we-start-the-new-year-webinar-from-january-7th-2026
Thanks. I really like Tom Cowan and how he presents his information.
Bacteria can produce toxic waste and that can create illness or possibly death, depending upon the circumstances. So, as I understand it, that can create illness as a byproduct from bacteria if it overwhelms the organism. If this is incorrect, I appreciate feedback.
All living organism create waste. As you point out waste in and of itself is toxic. As you mention sickness the result.
Whether the bacteria or its waste ( or both) are responsible is likely an academic consideration.
sounds logical to me, but of course I am not medically schooled. I just think of how our body reacts when we get bitten or stung by insects, scorpions, snakes... we can also get sick, I think, from funghi, and some you can eat only once!
Thank you very much!