An Exclusive Interview with CHD's and RFK Jr.'s scientific advisor, Dr. Jonathan Jay Couey
by investigative journalist Eric Coppolino
Greetings and best wishes,
I’ve taken a bit of a time-out from uploading new FOI responses (but do have many new ones to share!).
Instead, today I’d like to bring your attention to an important new article and interview for the freedom community, from longtime investigative journalist Eric Coppolino.
Last week Eric spoke with Jay Couey, who has been acting as “science” advisor for Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Children’s Health Defense - where “viruses” are taken as an article of faith - for the past 6 months or so.
The interview can be read, viewed or listened to, here:
(On a related note, here is a recent video that Tom Cowan, Mark Bailey, Andy Kaufman, Alec Zeck and I recorded in response to some earlier public statements that Jay had made:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/iZJAZEkra4uI/
Also, if you have or will listen to Jay’s rants about the allegedly horrific treatment he’s suffered at the hands of myself and other no-virus colleagues, a true timeline and my actual emails with Jay, Mary Holland and RFK Jr. can be found here:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/true-timeline-and-emails-with-chd-consultant-jay-couey/)
For Truth, Freedom and Sanity,
Christine, of the Massey family,
at Ontario, Canada
Thanks for this. I only learned of Couey 2-3 weeks ago. I had been told to check him out as he had solved the yes/no virus debate and the coof bioweapon virus mechanics all in one. I found an interview, the first one that came up on YouTube from Dec. He was interviewed in English by someone in Mexico. Anywho, I thought he was a hot mess and was clearly suffering from accute cognitive dissonance, in a true sense, based on a critical wound to his ontology and epistomological moorings. He constantly referred to viruses as ghosts, which seems to be his go to analogy, and to scientists having tricked themselves to see what wasn't there but then followed with absolute conviction the tricky viral ghosts are not only real but lurking. I actually felt sorry for him, the shattering of one's ontology for those who are ontologically rigid, which almost all medical doctors are, is rough and most never can shift completely. The ontologically flexible don't have this problem, but we are rarer, most tend towards rigidity (my theory is that what really marked the shift from the pre-modern to the modern mindset was the ever increasing dominance by the ontologically rigid, coupled with PR that they were the truly openminded ones, not the yes gods, faeries, and ghosts lot). I find it very amusing Couey uses an entity that his ontology mocks as the ignorant imaginings of the superstitious, ghosts, to make his case. I'm sure he is no ghost in all other respects, most yes virus are. We are at a crossroads, many theoretical ghosts from viruses to dark matter to epigenetics are about to be exorcized. Thanks again.
What a...wow. I've said enough in the Bitchute and Eric's Substack comments, but wow.
I'm shocked, not shocked at all.
I wrote an article...aimed at people who are just coming aboard.
I should have added you to my list, dagnabbits. I may edit it.