The FOI Request is yet another joke by the Borg on all those who still cling to a delusion of democracy and due process. The bureaucrats are paid to ignore you while ticking boxes.
Anything involving the word "freedom" coming from any government and especially the US government, means the exact opposite. Even when they respond, they can simply give you a document with everything blacked out as they did repeatedly on Covid vaccine- related requests. They are demonic criminals laughing at anyone who thinks they can use the system to stop the system.
It's a helluva lot more than just gaslighting! It's criminal fraud, and unlawful use of a seat of governmental power to force the citizenry to accept being systematically poisoned!
Thanks for all that you do! Do you know how difficult it is to see posters and signs and ads pushing these toxic injections and pharmaceuticals and knowing the horrible truth behind it all?? And what THEY did to the entire world economy using this pseudoscientific garbage to justify it?? 😤😠🤬
In all of the pain, suffering and misery humans are being subjected to by other humans, there are people who simply "roll-up their sleeves" and get on with exposing "evil doers" - dragging the truth into the light and trying to hold people and their institutions to account. They have such indefatigability, courage and fearlessness in pursuit, that they cannot be slowed nor quieted. Christine is one such person, rare like a diamond. Never take such people for granted; they are a gift, a reward to humanity, so cherish them and thank them!
My assessment of this "virus" propaganda. If you look at how the planet is/was designed, everything is in balance. Like a symbiotic relationship among all living forms. The notion that there is this tiny particle that we are told can only be viewed through electron microscopy just does not pass the smell test. That this tiny particle has the power to cause all kinds of disease/sickness like symptoms is pure fantasy. There are toxic and/or poisonous substances on the planet but those are mostly well known and have been proven to exist. I challenge anyone to explore anywhere on the planet and capture any of these so-called viruses. Again, just an assessment from an old country boy.
# Consolidated Briefing: The Case Against Virology's Empirical Foundations
## A Synthesis of Jamie Andrews (Virology Controls Studies Project) and Christine FOIs
This briefing integrates two independent lines of investigation that converge on a single conclusion: mainstream virology cannot produce the empirical evidence required by its own standards. Jamie Andrews demonstrated this through experimental falsification; Christine documented it through FOI requests that expose institutional evasion.
---
## Part 1: The FOI Evidence — What the CDC Cannot Produce
### The Original Request
On April 11, 2023, Christine filed a Freedom of Information request with the CDC seeking:
> "All studies and/or reports describing the purification of any 'COVID-19' virus directly from a sample taken from a diseased human, where the patient sample was **not first combined with any other source of genetic material (i.e. monkey kidney cells aka Vero cells; fetal bovine serum)**."
This request targets a precise methodological question: can the virus be isolated without first merging it with foreign biological material?
### The CDC's Response (or Non-Response)
After three years, the CDC has not provided the requested evidence. In an April 27, 2026 communication, the Department of Health and Human Services cited *"enhanced processing procedures"* and a *"broader effort to improve long-term efficiency, transparency, and service quality"* as explanations for the delay.
Christine notes the absurdity: three years to say they are still processing.
### Prior Admissions
This is not the first time the CDC has signaled inability to meet basic evidentiary standards. In a 2021 FOI response (Request #21-01075-FOIA), the CDC responded to a similar request by stating:
> *"A search of our records failed to reveal any documents pertaining to your request. Specifically, the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Disease apprises that CDC does not purify or isolate any COVID-19 virus in the manner the requestor describes."*
The CDC does not claim the evidence exists elsewhere. It claims no records exist matching the request.
### The Counterargument and Its Weakness
Critics of Christine's FOI approach argue that her request was deliberately crafted to exclude standard virological methods. A forum post attempting to refute her work states:
> *"She basically asked if the CDC had isolated the virus using a method where the 'patient sample was not first combined with any other source of genetic material (i.e. monkey kidney cells aka Vero cells; fetal bovine serum).' And of course, they hadn't, because you MUST infect other cells with the virus in order to culture it."*
This defense inadvertently concedes the premise: **virology cannot isolate a virus directly from a patient without first mixing it with animal cells and foreign genetic material.** The question Christine raises is whether this indirect method constitutes valid evidence of an independent, purified pathogen.
---
## Part 2: Jamie Andrews — Experimental Falsification of Virological Methodology
### The Control Studies Project
Jamie Andrews has been Project Managing The Control Studies Project for more than a year, working with over 100 contributors and a core group of accredited microbiologists and geneticists. The project's stated aim is to *"falsify the underlying methodology behind virology"* — specifically the PCR test and electron microscopy identification of viruses.
### The Bixonimania Experiment (Nature, 2026)
Andrews centers his analysis on a March 2026 *Nature* paper documenting researcher Almira Osmanovic Thunström's experiment. Thunström invented a fake disease called **bixonimania**, uploaded two fabricated preprints about it, and observed the following:
| Observation | Result |
|-------------|--------|
| AI chatbots (Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, ChatGPT) | Repeated bixonimania as genuine medical advice within weeks |
| Peer-reviewed literature | A *Cureus* paper (Springer Nature) cited the fake preprint |
| Retraction | *Cureus* retracted only after *Nature* contacted them |
The fake papers contained deliberate red flags, including:
- A non-existent university (*Asteria Horizon University, Nova City, California*)
- Acknowledgments thanking *"Professor Maria Bohm at Starfleet Academy"*
- Funding from *"the Professor Sideshow Bob Foundation"* and *"the Galactic Triad"*
- Statements reading *"this entire paper is made up"*
These flags were ignored.
### The Nocebo Mechanism
Andrews argues that the power of suggestion — the nocebo effect — is sufficient to generate the symptoms attributed to COVID-19. He cites a 2024 study concluding that **nocebo effects are stronger than placebo effects** in pain perception, consistent with an evolutionarily advantageous *"better-safe-than-sorry"* strategy.
His key observation: the symptom checklist for "fear" (elevated heart rate, shortness of breath, dizziness, nausea) is functionally identical to the checklist for "COVID-19." The same physical sensations, when primed by fear-based media coverage, become diagnostic of infection.
> *"You need precisely NOTHING, no causative agent whatsoever in this entirely plausible scenario."*
---
## Part 3: Synthesis — Two Flanks of the Same Fortress
### Convergent Findings
| Domain | Christine FOIs | Jamie Andrews |
|--------|----------------|----------------|
| Core claim | Institutions cannot produce primary evidence | Methodology cannot distinguish signal from noise |
| Method | Legal demand for documented evidence | Experimental falsification + literature review |
| Key finding | CDC admits no isolation/purification records | AI + peer review cannot detect obvious fraud |
| Implications | No independent variable exists | No valid dependent variable measurement exists |
### The Operational Conclusion
Both investigators arrive at the same operational reality: **the evidentiary chain required for virology as a science does not exist.**
- Christine shows that the CDC cannot produce documentation of direct virus purification from patient samples without foreign cellular material.
- Jamie shows that when fake data is injected into the system, it is accepted and propagated by both AI and peer review.
Together, these constitute a **double falsification**:
1. **Absence of primary evidence** (FOI documentation)
2. **Inability to detect fraudulent evidence** (bixonimania experiment)
### The Nocebo Amplifier
Andrews adds a critical psychological dimension that Christine's FOIs do not address. Even if virology lacks evidentiary foundations, the *belief* in invisible, transmissible threats is sufficient to generate real physical symptoms. The CDC's institutional authority — however empirically hollow — functions as a nocebo primer. The FOI failures do not weaken the nocebo effect; they reveal its underlying mechanism.
---
## Part 4: Direct Citations
### From Christine's Work
- April 2023 FOI request to CDC (documented with page references)
- 1930 Dochez contagion study (participant developed symptoms from suggestion alone)
- Control Studies Project methodology (working with accredited CROs, blinded experiments)
- ATCC protocols referenced for cell culture methodology
---
## Part 5: Outstanding Questions for Further Investigation
1. **Verification of FOI documents** — Christine's claims rest on document authenticity. Independent audit of her FOI release records would strengthen the case.
2. **Peer review of bixonimania** — Which specific journals accepted or rejected the fake preprints? The *Nature* article names *Cureus* but other submissions may exist.
3. **Quantification of nocebo effects in 2020** — Andrews cites studies on pain perception. Direct studies on respiratory symptom suggestion would be more germane.
4. **CDC's definition of "isolation"** — The agency's 2021 response specifies *"in the manner the requestor describes."* What alternative isolation methods does the CDC claim exist? Have those been documented?
---
## Appendix: Recommended Further Reading from Christine's Bibliography
- Dr. Sam Bailey — *High Court Showdown: Can India Prove Viruses Exist?*
- Mike Stone, viroLIEgy.com — *The Case Against Antibodies*
- Dawn Lester — *RSV: More misleading claims!*
- Drs. Sam & Mark Bailey — *The Great Virus Myth & Other Big Pharma Lies*
*(Note: These sources are independently published and not peer-reviewed in the conventional sense.)*
There is no need to engage the establishment biochemistry industry (i.e. to buy pseudoscience based "samples") to disprove a negative claim (i.e. "unicorn does not exist.")
If you've been paying attention since 2020, it is clear, given that MANY still do not "get it," that virology is clearly a bogus load, and the next step is understanding that vaccines are a means of making a LOT of money for a relative few, whilst causing immense misery and damage (and a big middle finger to science).
For some of us this is "old news." But it's still Big News to many, and so, let's applaud those like Christine, who have taken it upon themselves to enlighten-- and continue to enlighten-- those who are as yet unaware of this long-standing fraud. Cheers.
And Hurrah! for those who do the work to awaken the masses.
Virology has been a natural evolution of the pseudoscience (i.e. chemistry, hence biochemistry). The pseudoscience hit the #plandemic wall because of the unproven building block (i.e. periodic table) hypothesis hurt living beings directly through the jab.
The state sponsored mainstream scientific research has been all wrong, hence need defunding.
Many thanks Christine for your tireless work on these issues.
This was at CHD. Apparently NIH have a FOIA lady who helps to make the emails disappear
"A U.S. House committee investigating the COVID-19 pandemic today said it is investigating a possible conspiracy among high-level officials at the NIH to thwart FOIA requests for documents related to grants involving research conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology."
We are told acute respiratory illnesses are easy to transmit. After 200 years of attempts to demonstrate diseases can be spread, we find that transmission is extraordinarily difficult:
-In November 1919, 8 separate experiments were conducted by Rosenau et al. in a group of 62 men trying to prove that influenza is contagious and causes disease. In all 8 experiments, 0/62 men became sick. Another set of 8 experiments were undertaken in December of 1919 by McCoy et al. in 50 men to try and prove contagion. Once again, all 8 experiments failed to prove people with influenza, or their bodily fluids cause illness. 0/50 men became sick.
-In 1919, Wahl et al. conducted 3 separate experiments to infect 6 healthy men with influenza by exposing them to mucous secretions and lung tissue from sick people. 0/6 men contracted influenza in any of the three studies. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30082102?seq=1…
-In 1920, Schmidt et al conducted 2 controlled experiments, exposing healthy people to the bodily fluids of sick people. Of 196 people exposed to the mucous secretions of sick people, 21 (10.7%) developed colds and three developed grippe (1.5%). In the second group, of the 84 healthy people exposed to mucous secretions of sick people, five developed grippe (5.9%) and four colds (4.7%). Of 43 controls who had been inoculated with sterile physiological salt solutions eight (18.6%) developed colds. A higher percentage of people got sick after being exposed to saline compared to those being exposed to the “virus”. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19869857/https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/102609951
-In 1921, Williams et al. tried to experimentally infect 45 healthy men with the common cold and influenza, by exposing them to mucous secretions from sick people. 0/45 became ill. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19869857/
-In 1924, Robertson & Groves exposed 100 healthy individuals to the bodily secretions from 16 different people suffering from influenza. 0/100 became sick. https://academic.oup.com/…/article…/34/4/400/832936…
-The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Vol. 2, No. 2 (Mar. 1, 1905): - Chapman, 1801: Tried to transmit measles using the blood, tears, the mucus of the nostrils and bronchia, and the eruptive matter in the cuticle without any success.
-Willan, 1809: Inoculated three children with vesicle fluids of measles but without success.
-Albers, 1834: Attempted to infect four children with measles without success. He quoted Alexander Monro, Bourgois, and Spray as also having made unsuccessful inoculations with saliva, tears, and cutaneous scales.
-Themmen, 1817: Tried to infect 5 children with measles. 0/5 children became sick.
-Charles Creighton, 1837 (A history of epidemics in Britain). "No proof of the existence of any contagious principles by which it was propagated from one individual to another."
-Note on Hospitals by Florence Nightingale, 1858 - "Suffice it to say, that in the ordinary sense of the word, there is no proof, such as would be admitted in any scientific inquiry, that there is any such thing as 'contagion." also see "Just as there is no such thing as 'contagion,' there is no such thing as inevitable 'infection."
-Dr. Rodermund, 1901 - From his diary of Smallpox experiments. For 15 years he smeared the pus of smallpox patients on his face and used to go home with his family, play cards at the gentleman’s club and treat other patients and never got sick or saw a single other person get sick.
-Walter Reed, 1902 - “Without entering into details, I may say that, in the first place, the Commission saw, with some surprise, what had so often been noted in the literature, that patients in all stages of yellow fever could be cared for by non-immune nurses without danger of contracting the disease. The non-contagious character of yellow fever was, therefore, hardly to be questioned.”
-F.E. Batten, (1909) - “Against the infectivity of the disease may be urged, first, the absence of spread of infection in hospital. The cases of poliomyelitis admitted to hospital freely mixed with other cases in the ward without any isolation or disinfection, some 70 children came in contact, but no infection took place.”
-Dold et al. 1917 - Injected healthy people with the nasal secretions taken from one ill person, 1/40 healthy people became ill.
-J. C. Geiger, 1917 - 66 kids came into intimate contact with a child afflicted with polio. 0/66 became ill.
-Sellards, 1918: Tried to transmit measles to 8 healthy volunteers without a prior history of measles exposure. 0/8 men became sick after multiple failed attempts.
-Sellards and Wenworth, 1918: Inoculated 3 monkeys in various ways, including intensive injections of blood from measles patients. The animals remained well
-Sellards and Wenworth, 1918: Blood from measles patients was injected simultaneously into 2 men and 2 monkeys. Both men remained symptom-free. One of the two monkeys developed symptoms that were not suggestive of measles.
-Hess & Unger, 1918 - "In 3 instances the nasal secretion of varicella patients was applied to the nostrils; in 3 others the tonsillar secretion to the tonsils, and in 6, the tonsillar and pharyngeal secretions were transferred to the nose, the pharynx, and the tonsils. In none of these 12 cases was there any reaction whatsoever, either local or systemic."
-Hess & Unger, 1918 - The vesicle fluids from people with chickenpox was injected intravenously into 38 children. 0/38 became sick.
-Wahl et al, 1919 - Conducted 3 separate trials on 6 men attempting to infect them with different strains of Influenza. Not one person got sick.
-Mahatma Gandhi, 1921 - "and the poison that accumulates in the system is expelled in the form of small-pox. If this view is correct, then there is absolutely no need to be afraid of small-pox" also see "This has given rise to the superstition that it is a contagious disease, and hence to the attempt to mislead the people into the belief that vaccination is an effective means of preventing it."
-Robertson & Groves, 1924 - Exposed 100 healthy individuals to the bodily secretions from 16 different people suffering from influenza. 0 people of 100 got sick.
-Bauguess, 1924 - "A careful search of the literature does not reveal a case in which the blood from a patient having measles was injected into the blood stream of another person and produced measles."
-Volney S and Chney M.D., 1928 - A study where it is clearly stated that cold is not infectious. Dochez et al, 1930 - Attempted to infect 11 men with intranasal influenza. Not a single person got sick.
-Thomas Francis Jr et al, 1936 - Gave 23 people influenza via 3 different methods. 0 people got sick. They gave 2 people already "suffering from colds" the influenza who also did not get sick.
-Burnet and Lush, 1937 - 200 people given "Melbourne type" Influenza . 0 people showed any symptoms of disease.
-Burnet and Foley, 1940 - Attempted to experimentally infect 15 university students with influenza. The authors concluded their experiment was a failure.
-Thomas Francis Jr, 1940 - Gave 11 people "Epidemic Influenza." 0 people got sick.
-Ralph R. Scobey, 1951 - ”Although poliomyelitis is legally a contagious disease, which implies that it is caused by a germ or virus, every attempt has failed conclusively to prove this mandatory requirement of the public health law.”
-Douglas Gordon et al, 1975 - This study gave 10 people English type Influenza and 10 people a placebo. The study was negative. Most telling is they admit that the only symptoms were seen in the placebo group.
-Nancy Padian, 1996 - A study which followed 176 discordant couples (1 HIV positive and the other negative) for 10 years. These couples regularly slept together and had unprotected sex. There were no HIV transmissions from the positive partner to the negative partner during the entirety of the study
-John Treanor et al, 1999 - Gave 108 people Influenza A. Only 35% recorded mild symptoms such as stuffy nose. Unfortunately 35% of the placebo control group also developed mild symptoms.
-Bridges et al, 2003 - "Our review found no human experimental studies published in the English-language literature delineating person-to-person transmission of influenza."
-The Virology Journal, 2008 - ”There were 5 attempts to demonstrate sick-to-well influenza transmission in the desperate days following the 1918 flu and all were ’singularly fruitless’ … all five studies failed to support sick-to-well transmission, in spite of having numerous acutely ill influenza patients, in various stages of their illness, carefully cough, spit, and breathe on a combined total of >150 well patients.”
-Public Health Reports, 2010 - ”It seemed that what was acknowledged to be one of the most contagious of communicable diseases [1918 flu] could not be transferred under experimental conditions.”
-Jonathan Van Tam, 2020 - Conducted these human trials of Flu A in 2013. 52 people were intentionally given "Flu A" and made to live in controlled conditions with 75 people. 0 people got ill.
-In March of 1919 Rosenau & Keegan conducted 9 separate experiments in a group of 49 healthy men, to prove contagion. In all 9 experiments, 0/49 men became sick.
The moment you fully comprehend that there’s no scientific evidence for the existence of any virus. That illnesses misattributed to non-existent viruses are not contagious. You realize, with a rush of true horror, what the vaccine industry is about.
I can point to dozens of studies, that span over 100 years, proving illnesses are not contagious. Yet, the vast majority believe they are. Why? It’s THE ruse which permits deeply unpleasant people use to gain access to the insides of almost every person & captive animal in the world. This cannot be for any purpose other than malign initiatives.
Then you read about Katherine Watt’s deep dive into over a century of federal non-regulation of these non-medical injectable products. Then you begin to appreciate that the burden of chronic illness is precisely aligned to the “vaccine schedule” in the USA. A fake pandemic is triggered in 2020, after 25 years of tabletop simulations, starting at a military base in USA and ending with Event 201 in late 2019. This non public health event has multiple purposes including but not limited to jamming intentionally harmful material into 5.5 billion arms. You explore & confirm that pandemics do not occur, only the pretense of them, like the story of the fake 1918 Spanish Flu pandemic. Then you notice the worldwide rollout of soon to be mandatory digital ID, the worlds first updated in real time ID, which will provide conditional authorization of anything its controllers choose. Having seen “vaccine passports” applied in some places from 2021, you appreciate that this kind of system can be applied everywhere, if the controllers decide it. You observe factories being built capable of delivering tens of billions of doses of new kinds of non medical products called “vaccines”. You realize these intentionally harmful materials can only be destined for animals including humans. You watch as cash gets harder to obtain and to use and digital money becomes near universal. Governments and central banks everywhere talk of CBDC. You put together mandatory digital ID, vaccine passports, cashless CBDC, and things like the UN 2030 Sustainable Development Goals & comprehend that, if the systems outlined above are not for imposition of totalitarian control and population reduction, you can make no sense of any of it. But it’s up to you. If you’ve convinced yourself that there’s a benign interpretation of all of this, I don’t know what I can say to convince you otherwise. https://interestofjustice.substack.com/p/the-global-architecture-of-vaccine
They are death and disease shots administered en masse so as to create a diseased, autistic population dependent on pharma and largely doomed to die of cancer.
Yes! And please note that Christine has been part of the growing number of both scientists AND regular people who can understand the scientists (and common sense) that this has all been a scam for... what else? ... money. (And maybe some fuckery, too, pardon ma francaise.)
I left a detailed commented under this article of Geoff's years ago and he deleted my comment. The study he references is the infamous Australian study by Caly et all, where in addition to the usual absurdities the virologists decided the particle that they wanted to be "the virus" didn't look like their mental image of a coronavirus, so they added the enzyme trypsin which digests proteins, and after the enzyme broke down the particle it was bumpier/spiky in appearance and then they were happy and satisfied that they had "the virus". There are many images in many studies where authors claim to show "the virus". We call this the "point and declare method". They simply point and declare, like me pointing at you and declaring you're a serial killer with no supporting evidence. Geoff should know that getting sick is not evidence of a virus or a contagious illness. I was shocked at his attitude and unwillingless to have a discussion.
It's fascinating, in a tiresome kind of way, to see how hard people will work to prop up a total falsehood. Well, slowly but surely, the Truth Always Outs.
Yes I am stunned as well. He always answers my questions very kindly. I know he does not like some other Substackers, but it is normal to not agree with everyone! This is very disturbing and I thank you for your comment.
Not being a virologist, I have no way to determine if Pain's photos actually show the C19 bug or not...I do know I visited the CDC website in about 2023 and took a screenshot of a page stating "there are currently no purified samples of C19 virus available". If anyone on earth should possess such it would be the CDC...THAT was when I really began to wonder-
There's a book that came out in 2020 by Thomas Cowan about many things, but very scientific in explaining how the entire "virus" (which means "toxin" in Latin) AND the vaccine INDUSTRY (pointedly using that term), has done vast damage to human beings for the simple reason of... Money.
Look for "The Contagion Myth." I recommend Thriftbooks, which often sell books at a bit cheaper than other places it can be found. Cowan takes us through all sorts of information that will advance many of our long-held mythology into factual info.
Cheers.
PS: As a long-term researcher I will say this: There is no "C19 bug" FYI. There are no "germs" as we've been taught to think of them. There are three levels of grunge that can sicken us-- so, starting with the least harmful, and in terminology that is strictly for laypeople: There is Firch, which is something you can brush off or wash off; then there's gunk, which might smell quite nasty and CAN make you ill; and lastly, and most disgusting, and should not be taken into the body for any reason, there is Spooge. ;)
I'm not a virologist either. Tons of people who are not virologists now understand the absurdity of virology. Once you understand the basics of what they are and aren't doing, it's very easy for anyone to see that they do not adhere to the scientific method or even a little bit of logic. There is tons of educational material now for lay people. I've collected some of it here: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/what-the-hell-is-going-on/
there you go - I don't know either, I have no science background at all. Is it or is it not that virus? do viruses exist? This is the only person so far I have come across, who posted this pic. You would think if it were real, it would be all over the place, but it is not. And several doctors, nurses, chemists... have asked all over the world for verification, and none got a result. I am stepping away from the virus idea, I feel more confident in the terrain theory. But let us not forget that all of it is theory! we don't know and probably never will.
Where there's a LOT of money involved, the need to keep the Nastiest Lies, including "viruses" and "contagion" floating around like it's actually TRUE and/or "science" becomes a kind of game. In the first year after the "Covid" vaccine came out, the death rate jumped hugely. But in that same year, the vaccine companies, such as Pfizer made record, and vast, profits. I think I read that the US alone saw about 20 NEW billionaires created. I could be wrong about that number, but... For me, just ONE billionaire profiting from vaccines is anathema.
The pic he posted is from a study cited at the bottom of his article, by Caly et al. That study has been featured on my FOI webpage since 2020, highlighted to show how ridiculous virology is. See my comment above about it.
I FOI'd the institution where that study was done (Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity) and they admitted to having to record of the supposed virus actually being found in and purified from any bodily fluid, by anyone, anywhere on the planet:
The Australian government cited this study in response to an FOI to the Department of Health. They admitted they didn't have what I had asked for and cited this as evidence of "isolation of SARS-CoV-2 in culture“. 'Isolation in culture' is an oxymoron, it is not isolation of anything and does not demonstrate that the particles shown were in the clinical sample to begin with. Plus they never purify the particles even from the cell culture so that they can sequence and characterized them and study them with valid controlled experiments to see if it actually fits the definition of a virus. They just point at tiny particles in the breaking-down monkey/cow/human mixture and declare "that's the virus"!
Here is what Dr. Tom Cowan had to say about this study:
“They said they looked at the results of this culture from the Vero cells, and they found little vesicles and they said they contain coronavirus particles, but the viruses did not look like the normal coronaviruses… in other words they didn’t have the spike protein on them, and then quote ‘It was found that adding trypsin to the cell culture medium immediately improved virion morphology‘ meaning the appearance of the virus, in other words they looked in the cell culture and they didn’t see any particles with the spike protein so they added trypsin which as you probably know is a pancreatic enzyme whose function is to digest proteins, which is what the outer coating of a virus is supposedly made of, so this outer coating of the ‘virus’ was digested by the trypsin which then quote ‘improved the appearance of the ‘virus”. In other words, it was only then that they could see the spike proteins, which immediately would make anybody think that the only reason you could see the spike proteins is because they dissolved the proteins around the coating which would naturally leave little spikey things protruding out from the membrane. When you hear this you can only shake your head and think ‘what the heck, that’s not how people do stuff’. The fact of the matter is there was no spike-protein-looking particle from the culture…. They simply could not find a particle with spike protein, so they cut away some of the edges, leaving naturally spikes protruding from the wall and they said ‘there it is, the spike protein. If that isn’t the wackiest way of thinking I’ve ever seen….”
I already wondered before, how come everyone who asked for it got that response - we do not have the evidence. But there it is. If it were the real thing, would they not jump on it and spread the pictures far and wide?
I have been reading a book from Dr. Cowan and largely agree from what I already knew, with what he states. Only thing - I do not like injections and he seems to be injecting quite a few things (that is just me and needles).
i think the government should pay you to publish this study
i'm with you 100% of the way!
thank you for your diligence
we owe you muchly
regards
The FOI Request is yet another joke by the Borg on all those who still cling to a delusion of democracy and due process. The bureaucrats are paid to ignore you while ticking boxes.
Anything involving the word "freedom" coming from any government and especially the US government, means the exact opposite. Even when they respond, they can simply give you a document with everything blacked out as they did repeatedly on Covid vaccine- related requests. They are demonic criminals laughing at anyone who thinks they can use the system to stop the system.
It's a helluva lot more than just gaslighting! It's criminal fraud, and unlawful use of a seat of governmental power to force the citizenry to accept being systematically poisoned!
Thanks for all that you do! Do you know how difficult it is to see posters and signs and ads pushing these toxic injections and pharmaceuticals and knowing the horrible truth behind it all?? And what THEY did to the entire world economy using this pseudoscientific garbage to justify it?? 😤😠🤬
Wonder if their new system is under Palantir, too— as well as the USDA…
Y’know, I’m so damn sick of these effin people…
In all of the pain, suffering and misery humans are being subjected to by other humans, there are people who simply "roll-up their sleeves" and get on with exposing "evil doers" - dragging the truth into the light and trying to hold people and their institutions to account. They have such indefatigability, courage and fearlessness in pursuit, that they cannot be slowed nor quieted. Christine is one such person, rare like a diamond. Never take such people for granted; they are a gift, a reward to humanity, so cherish them and thank them!
Hear, hear! Christine is a true gem to all of us who look for Truthiness!
Such kinds words, thank you so much Jonny. All the best. xo
He's Right On, O indefatigable CM. Hope you are doing well, you are a Rock of Truthiness for everyone. xo
You are most welcome Christine.
Firm conviction; a good heart; good spirit; good soul and good intentions - lead to good outcomes!
What you do "keeps both hope and a moral future alive" - even in the darkest of times, which we we are all navigating.
Have a happy Labour Day weekend - or just a happy and peaceful weekend - if you have to wait until 1 September!
My assessment of this "virus" propaganda. If you look at how the planet is/was designed, everything is in balance. Like a symbiotic relationship among all living forms. The notion that there is this tiny particle that we are told can only be viewed through electron microscopy just does not pass the smell test. That this tiny particle has the power to cause all kinds of disease/sickness like symptoms is pure fantasy. There are toxic and/or poisonous substances on the planet but those are mostly well known and have been proven to exist. I challenge anyone to explore anywhere on the planet and capture any of these so-called viruses. Again, just an assessment from an old country boy.
I'm in complete agreement with what you say.
# Consolidated Briefing: The Case Against Virology's Empirical Foundations
## A Synthesis of Jamie Andrews (Virology Controls Studies Project) and Christine FOIs
This briefing integrates two independent lines of investigation that converge on a single conclusion: mainstream virology cannot produce the empirical evidence required by its own standards. Jamie Andrews demonstrated this through experimental falsification; Christine documented it through FOI requests that expose institutional evasion.
---
## Part 1: The FOI Evidence — What the CDC Cannot Produce
### The Original Request
On April 11, 2023, Christine filed a Freedom of Information request with the CDC seeking:
> "All studies and/or reports describing the purification of any 'COVID-19' virus directly from a sample taken from a diseased human, where the patient sample was **not first combined with any other source of genetic material (i.e. monkey kidney cells aka Vero cells; fetal bovine serum)**."
This request targets a precise methodological question: can the virus be isolated without first merging it with foreign biological material?
### The CDC's Response (or Non-Response)
After three years, the CDC has not provided the requested evidence. In an April 27, 2026 communication, the Department of Health and Human Services cited *"enhanced processing procedures"* and a *"broader effort to improve long-term efficiency, transparency, and service quality"* as explanations for the delay.
Christine notes the absurdity: three years to say they are still processing.
### Prior Admissions
This is not the first time the CDC has signaled inability to meet basic evidentiary standards. In a 2021 FOI response (Request #21-01075-FOIA), the CDC responded to a similar request by stating:
> *"A search of our records failed to reveal any documents pertaining to your request. Specifically, the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Disease apprises that CDC does not purify or isolate any COVID-19 virus in the manner the requestor describes."*
The CDC does not claim the evidence exists elsewhere. It claims no records exist matching the request.
### The Counterargument and Its Weakness
Critics of Christine's FOI approach argue that her request was deliberately crafted to exclude standard virological methods. A forum post attempting to refute her work states:
> *"She basically asked if the CDC had isolated the virus using a method where the 'patient sample was not first combined with any other source of genetic material (i.e. monkey kidney cells aka Vero cells; fetal bovine serum).' And of course, they hadn't, because you MUST infect other cells with the virus in order to culture it."*
This defense inadvertently concedes the premise: **virology cannot isolate a virus directly from a patient without first mixing it with animal cells and foreign genetic material.** The question Christine raises is whether this indirect method constitutes valid evidence of an independent, purified pathogen.
---
## Part 2: Jamie Andrews — Experimental Falsification of Virological Methodology
### The Control Studies Project
Jamie Andrews has been Project Managing The Control Studies Project for more than a year, working with over 100 contributors and a core group of accredited microbiologists and geneticists. The project's stated aim is to *"falsify the underlying methodology behind virology"* — specifically the PCR test and electron microscopy identification of viruses.
### The Bixonimania Experiment (Nature, 2026)
Andrews centers his analysis on a March 2026 *Nature* paper documenting researcher Almira Osmanovic Thunström's experiment. Thunström invented a fake disease called **bixonimania**, uploaded two fabricated preprints about it, and observed the following:
| Observation | Result |
|-------------|--------|
| AI chatbots (Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, ChatGPT) | Repeated bixonimania as genuine medical advice within weeks |
| Peer-reviewed literature | A *Cureus* paper (Springer Nature) cited the fake preprint |
| Retraction | *Cureus* retracted only after *Nature* contacted them |
The fake papers contained deliberate red flags, including:
- A non-existent university (*Asteria Horizon University, Nova City, California*)
- Acknowledgments thanking *"Professor Maria Bohm at Starfleet Academy"*
- Funding from *"the Professor Sideshow Bob Foundation"* and *"the Galactic Triad"*
- Statements reading *"this entire paper is made up"*
These flags were ignored.
### The Nocebo Mechanism
Andrews argues that the power of suggestion — the nocebo effect — is sufficient to generate the symptoms attributed to COVID-19. He cites a 2024 study concluding that **nocebo effects are stronger than placebo effects** in pain perception, consistent with an evolutionarily advantageous *"better-safe-than-sorry"* strategy.
His key observation: the symptom checklist for "fear" (elevated heart rate, shortness of breath, dizziness, nausea) is functionally identical to the checklist for "COVID-19." The same physical sensations, when primed by fear-based media coverage, become diagnostic of infection.
> *"You need precisely NOTHING, no causative agent whatsoever in this entirely plausible scenario."*
---
## Part 3: Synthesis — Two Flanks of the Same Fortress
### Convergent Findings
| Domain | Christine FOIs | Jamie Andrews |
|--------|----------------|----------------|
| Core claim | Institutions cannot produce primary evidence | Methodology cannot distinguish signal from noise |
| Method | Legal demand for documented evidence | Experimental falsification + literature review |
| Key finding | CDC admits no isolation/purification records | AI + peer review cannot detect obvious fraud |
| Implications | No independent variable exists | No valid dependent variable measurement exists |
### The Operational Conclusion
Both investigators arrive at the same operational reality: **the evidentiary chain required for virology as a science does not exist.**
- Christine shows that the CDC cannot produce documentation of direct virus purification from patient samples without foreign cellular material.
- Jamie shows that when fake data is injected into the system, it is accepted and propagated by both AI and peer review.
Together, these constitute a **double falsification**:
1. **Absence of primary evidence** (FOI documentation)
2. **Inability to detect fraudulent evidence** (bixonimania experiment)
### The Nocebo Amplifier
Andrews adds a critical psychological dimension that Christine's FOIs do not address. Even if virology lacks evidentiary foundations, the *belief* in invisible, transmissible threats is sufficient to generate real physical symptoms. The CDC's institutional authority — however empirically hollow — functions as a nocebo primer. The FOI failures do not weaken the nocebo effect; they reveal its underlying mechanism.
---
## Part 4: Direct Citations
### From Christine's Work
- April 2023 FOI request to CDC (documented with page references)
- HHS April 27, 2026 response citing "enhanced processing procedures" (pg 21-22)
- March 1, 2021 CDC admission re: no isolation/purification (bottom of page 3)
- Database of 225 institutions with no SARS-CoV-2 isolation records (Excel file linked in original)
- CDC FOI #21-01075-FOIA (June 7, 2021 response)
### From Jamie Andrews' Work
- *Nature* bixonimania study (March 2026) — documented in his Substack article
- 2024 pain study: placebo vs. nocebo effects (German Clinical Trials Register #DRKS00029228)
- 1930 Dochez contagion study (participant developed symptoms from suggestion alone)
- Control Studies Project methodology (working with accredited CROs, blinded experiments)
- ATCC protocols referenced for cell culture methodology
---
## Part 5: Outstanding Questions for Further Investigation
1. **Verification of FOI documents** — Christine's claims rest on document authenticity. Independent audit of her FOI release records would strengthen the case.
2. **Peer review of bixonimania** — Which specific journals accepted or rejected the fake preprints? The *Nature* article names *Cureus* but other submissions may exist.
3. **Quantification of nocebo effects in 2020** — Andrews cites studies on pain perception. Direct studies on respiratory symptom suggestion would be more germane.
4. **CDC's definition of "isolation"** — The agency's 2021 response specifies *"in the manner the requestor describes."* What alternative isolation methods does the CDC claim exist? Have those been documented?
---
## Appendix: Recommended Further Reading from Christine's Bibliography
- Dr. Sam Bailey — *High Court Showdown: Can India Prove Viruses Exist?*
- Mike Stone, viroLIEgy.com — *The Case Against Antibodies*
- Dawn Lester — *RSV: More misleading claims!*
- Drs. Sam & Mark Bailey — *The Great Virus Myth & Other Big Pharma Lies*
*(Note: These sources are independently published and not peer-reviewed in the conventional sense.)*
Biochemistry is pseudoscience:
There is no need to engage the establishment biochemistry industry (i.e. to buy pseudoscience based "samples") to disprove a negative claim (i.e. "unicorn does not exist.")
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1873796825364504852.html
If you've been paying attention since 2020, it is clear, given that MANY still do not "get it," that virology is clearly a bogus load, and the next step is understanding that vaccines are a means of making a LOT of money for a relative few, whilst causing immense misery and damage (and a big middle finger to science).
For some of us this is "old news." But it's still Big News to many, and so, let's applaud those like Christine, who have taken it upon themselves to enlighten-- and continue to enlighten-- those who are as yet unaware of this long-standing fraud. Cheers.
And Hurrah! for those who do the work to awaken the masses.
Virology has been a natural evolution of the pseudoscience (i.e. chemistry, hence biochemistry). The pseudoscience hit the #plandemic wall because of the unproven building block (i.e. periodic table) hypothesis hurt living beings directly through the jab.
The state sponsored mainstream scientific research has been all wrong, hence need defunding.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/2028915724404617236.html
I agree.
Many thanks Christine for your tireless work on these issues.
This was at CHD. Apparently NIH have a FOIA lady who helps to make the emails disappear
"A U.S. House committee investigating the COVID-19 pandemic today said it is investigating a possible conspiracy among high-level officials at the NIH to thwart FOIA requests for documents related to grants involving research conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology."
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/nih-fauci-morens-hid-wuhan-gain-of-function-research-documents-public/
We are told acute respiratory illnesses are easy to transmit. After 200 years of attempts to demonstrate diseases can be spread, we find that transmission is extraordinarily difficult:
-In November 1919, 8 separate experiments were conducted by Rosenau et al. in a group of 62 men trying to prove that influenza is contagious and causes disease. In all 8 experiments, 0/62 men became sick. Another set of 8 experiments were undertaken in December of 1919 by McCoy et al. in 50 men to try and prove contagion. Once again, all 8 experiments failed to prove people with influenza, or their bodily fluids cause illness. 0/50 men became sick.
-In 1919, Wahl et al. conducted 3 separate experiments to infect 6 healthy men with influenza by exposing them to mucous secretions and lung tissue from sick people. 0/6 men contracted influenza in any of the three studies. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30082102?seq=1…
-In 1920, Schmidt et al conducted 2 controlled experiments, exposing healthy people to the bodily fluids of sick people. Of 196 people exposed to the mucous secretions of sick people, 21 (10.7%) developed colds and three developed grippe (1.5%). In the second group, of the 84 healthy people exposed to mucous secretions of sick people, five developed grippe (5.9%) and four colds (4.7%). Of 43 controls who had been inoculated with sterile physiological salt solutions eight (18.6%) developed colds. A higher percentage of people got sick after being exposed to saline compared to those being exposed to the “virus”. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19869857/https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/102609951
-In 1921, Williams et al. tried to experimentally infect 45 healthy men with the common cold and influenza, by exposing them to mucous secretions from sick people. 0/45 became ill. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19869857/
-In 1924, Robertson & Groves exposed 100 healthy individuals to the bodily secretions from 16 different people suffering from influenza. 0/100 became sick. https://academic.oup.com/…/article…/34/4/400/832936…
-In 1937 Burnet & Lush conducted an experiment exposing 200 healthy people to bodily secretions from people infected with influenza. 0/200 became sick. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2065253/
-In 1940, Burnet and Foley tried to experimentally infect 15 university students with influenza. The authors concluded their experiment was a failure. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/…/j.1326-5377.1940…
-The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Vol. 2, No. 2 (Mar. 1, 1905): - Chapman, 1801: Tried to transmit measles using the blood, tears, the mucus of the nostrils and bronchia, and the eruptive matter in the cuticle without any success.
-Willan, 1809: Inoculated three children with vesicle fluids of measles but without success.
-Albers, 1834: Attempted to infect four children with measles without success. He quoted Alexander Monro, Bourgois, and Spray as also having made unsuccessful inoculations with saliva, tears, and cutaneous scales.
-Themmen, 1817: Tried to infect 5 children with measles. 0/5 children became sick.
-Charles Creighton, 1837 (A history of epidemics in Britain). "No proof of the existence of any contagious principles by which it was propagated from one individual to another."
-Note on Hospitals by Florence Nightingale, 1858 - "Suffice it to say, that in the ordinary sense of the word, there is no proof, such as would be admitted in any scientific inquiry, that there is any such thing as 'contagion." also see "Just as there is no such thing as 'contagion,' there is no such thing as inevitable 'infection."
-Dr. Rodermund, 1901 - From his diary of Smallpox experiments. For 15 years he smeared the pus of smallpox patients on his face and used to go home with his family, play cards at the gentleman’s club and treat other patients and never got sick or saw a single other person get sick.
-Walter Reed, 1902 - “Without entering into details, I may say that, in the first place, the Commission saw, with some surprise, what had so often been noted in the literature, that patients in all stages of yellow fever could be cared for by non-immune nurses without danger of contracting the disease. The non-contagious character of yellow fever was, therefore, hardly to be questioned.”
-F.E. Batten, (1909) - “Against the infectivity of the disease may be urged, first, the absence of spread of infection in hospital. The cases of poliomyelitis admitted to hospital freely mixed with other cases in the ward without any isolation or disinfection, some 70 children came in contact, but no infection took place.”
-Dold et al. 1917 - Injected healthy people with the nasal secretions taken from one ill person, 1/40 healthy people became ill.
-J. C. Geiger, 1917 - 66 kids came into intimate contact with a child afflicted with polio. 0/66 became ill.
-Sellards, 1918: Tried to transmit measles to 8 healthy volunteers without a prior history of measles exposure. 0/8 men became sick after multiple failed attempts.
-Sellards and Wenworth, 1918: Inoculated 3 monkeys in various ways, including intensive injections of blood from measles patients. The animals remained well
-Sellards and Wenworth, 1918: Blood from measles patients was injected simultaneously into 2 men and 2 monkeys. Both men remained symptom-free. One of the two monkeys developed symptoms that were not suggestive of measles.
-Hess & Unger, 1918 - "In 3 instances the nasal secretion of varicella patients was applied to the nostrils; in 3 others the tonsillar secretion to the tonsils, and in 6, the tonsillar and pharyngeal secretions were transferred to the nose, the pharynx, and the tonsils. In none of these 12 cases was there any reaction whatsoever, either local or systemic."
-Hess & Unger, 1918 - The vesicle fluids from people with chickenpox was injected intravenously into 38 children. 0/38 became sick.
-Wahl et al, 1919 - Conducted 3 separate trials on 6 men attempting to infect them with different strains of Influenza. Not one person got sick.
-Mahatma Gandhi, 1921 - "and the poison that accumulates in the system is expelled in the form of small-pox. If this view is correct, then there is absolutely no need to be afraid of small-pox" also see "This has given rise to the superstition that it is a contagious disease, and hence to the attempt to mislead the people into the belief that vaccination is an effective means of preventing it."
-Robertson & Groves, 1924 - Exposed 100 healthy individuals to the bodily secretions from 16 different people suffering from influenza. 0 people of 100 got sick.
-Bauguess, 1924 - "A careful search of the literature does not reveal a case in which the blood from a patient having measles was injected into the blood stream of another person and produced measles."
-Volney S and Chney M.D., 1928 - A study where it is clearly stated that cold is not infectious. Dochez et al, 1930 - Attempted to infect 11 men with intranasal influenza. Not a single person got sick.
-Thomas Francis Jr et al, 1936 - Gave 23 people influenza via 3 different methods. 0 people got sick. They gave 2 people already "suffering from colds" the influenza who also did not get sick.
-Burnet and Lush, 1937 - 200 people given "Melbourne type" Influenza . 0 people showed any symptoms of disease.
-Burnet and Foley, 1940 - Attempted to experimentally infect 15 university students with influenza. The authors concluded their experiment was a failure.
-Thomas Francis Jr, 1940 - Gave 11 people "Epidemic Influenza." 0 people got sick.
-Ralph R. Scobey, 1951 - ”Although poliomyelitis is legally a contagious disease, which implies that it is caused by a germ or virus, every attempt has failed conclusively to prove this mandatory requirement of the public health law.”
-Douglas Gordon et al, 1975 - This study gave 10 people English type Influenza and 10 people a placebo. The study was negative. Most telling is they admit that the only symptoms were seen in the placebo group.
-Nancy Padian, 1996 - A study which followed 176 discordant couples (1 HIV positive and the other negative) for 10 years. These couples regularly slept together and had unprotected sex. There were no HIV transmissions from the positive partner to the negative partner during the entirety of the study
-John Treanor et al, 1999 - Gave 108 people Influenza A. Only 35% recorded mild symptoms such as stuffy nose. Unfortunately 35% of the placebo control group also developed mild symptoms.
-Bridges et al, 2003 - "Our review found no human experimental studies published in the English-language literature delineating person-to-person transmission of influenza."
-The Virology Journal, 2008 - ”There were 5 attempts to demonstrate sick-to-well influenza transmission in the desperate days following the 1918 flu and all were ’singularly fruitless’ … all five studies failed to support sick-to-well transmission, in spite of having numerous acutely ill influenza patients, in various stages of their illness, carefully cough, spit, and breathe on a combined total of >150 well patients.”
-Public Health Reports, 2010 - ”It seemed that what was acknowledged to be one of the most contagious of communicable diseases [1918 flu] could not be transferred under experimental conditions.”
-Jonathan Van Tam, 2020 - Conducted these human trials of Flu A in 2013. 52 people were intentionally given "Flu A" and made to live in controlled conditions with 75 people. 0 people got ill.
-In March of 1919 Rosenau & Keegan conducted 9 separate experiments in a group of 49 healthy men, to prove contagion. In all 9 experiments, 0/49 men became sick.
And I think it's safe to say, at this point, that contagion is also nonsense.
It's not just "difficult," it's pointless. Well, that's my strongly held conclusion.
To my knowledge, nobody has ever shown contagion to be a reality. ^_^
Good work!
Excellent list, thank you so much, Champ :)
The moment you fully comprehend that there’s no scientific evidence for the existence of any virus. That illnesses misattributed to non-existent viruses are not contagious. You realize, with a rush of true horror, what the vaccine industry is about.
I can point to dozens of studies, that span over 100 years, proving illnesses are not contagious. Yet, the vast majority believe they are. Why? It’s THE ruse which permits deeply unpleasant people use to gain access to the insides of almost every person & captive animal in the world. This cannot be for any purpose other than malign initiatives.
Then you read about Katherine Watt’s deep dive into over a century of federal non-regulation of these non-medical injectable products. Then you begin to appreciate that the burden of chronic illness is precisely aligned to the “vaccine schedule” in the USA. A fake pandemic is triggered in 2020, after 25 years of tabletop simulations, starting at a military base in USA and ending with Event 201 in late 2019. This non public health event has multiple purposes including but not limited to jamming intentionally harmful material into 5.5 billion arms. You explore & confirm that pandemics do not occur, only the pretense of them, like the story of the fake 1918 Spanish Flu pandemic. Then you notice the worldwide rollout of soon to be mandatory digital ID, the worlds first updated in real time ID, which will provide conditional authorization of anything its controllers choose. Having seen “vaccine passports” applied in some places from 2021, you appreciate that this kind of system can be applied everywhere, if the controllers decide it. You observe factories being built capable of delivering tens of billions of doses of new kinds of non medical products called “vaccines”. You realize these intentionally harmful materials can only be destined for animals including humans. You watch as cash gets harder to obtain and to use and digital money becomes near universal. Governments and central banks everywhere talk of CBDC. You put together mandatory digital ID, vaccine passports, cashless CBDC, and things like the UN 2030 Sustainable Development Goals & comprehend that, if the systems outlined above are not for imposition of totalitarian control and population reduction, you can make no sense of any of it. But it’s up to you. If you’ve convinced yourself that there’s a benign interpretation of all of this, I don’t know what I can say to convince you otherwise. https://interestofjustice.substack.com/p/the-global-architecture-of-vaccine
They are death and disease shots administered en masse so as to create a diseased, autistic population dependent on pharma and largely doomed to die of cancer.
Yes! And please note that Christine has been part of the growing number of both scientists AND regular people who can understand the scientists (and common sense) that this has all been a scam for... what else? ... money. (And maybe some fuckery, too, pardon ma francaise.)
Virology is pseudoscience. Vaccines do more harm than good.
Truth, Freedom, and Sanity are threatened nearly to extinction! Thank you Christine for being a beautiful resounding voice of reason. 🙏
#periodictablehoax: "The element discovery stories in textbooks are essentially mythologies."
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/2027374762687705154.html
The only pic I have seen so far from the Corona virus was on a stack from Geoff Pain. https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/first-detected-covid19-case-arrived
He also stated that shortly after he fell sick himself.
Not sure if one caused the other, though. Been in several houses where one or more people were sick and I did not get it.
I left a detailed commented under this article of Geoff's years ago and he deleted my comment. The study he references is the infamous Australian study by Caly et all, where in addition to the usual absurdities the virologists decided the particle that they wanted to be "the virus" didn't look like their mental image of a coronavirus, so they added the enzyme trypsin which digests proteins, and after the enzyme broke down the particle it was bumpier/spiky in appearance and then they were happy and satisfied that they had "the virus". There are many images in many studies where authors claim to show "the virus". We call this the "point and declare method". They simply point and declare, like me pointing at you and declaring you're a serial killer with no supporting evidence. Geoff should know that getting sick is not evidence of a virus or a contagious illness. I was shocked at his attitude and unwillingless to have a discussion.
It's fascinating, in a tiresome kind of way, to see how hard people will work to prop up a total falsehood. Well, slowly but surely, the Truth Always Outs.
Yes I am stunned as well. He always answers my questions very kindly. I know he does not like some other Substackers, but it is normal to not agree with everyone! This is very disturbing and I thank you for your comment.
Not being a virologist, I have no way to determine if Pain's photos actually show the C19 bug or not...I do know I visited the CDC website in about 2023 and took a screenshot of a page stating "there are currently no purified samples of C19 virus available". If anyone on earth should possess such it would be the CDC...THAT was when I really began to wonder-
There's a book that came out in 2020 by Thomas Cowan about many things, but very scientific in explaining how the entire "virus" (which means "toxin" in Latin) AND the vaccine INDUSTRY (pointedly using that term), has done vast damage to human beings for the simple reason of... Money.
Look for "The Contagion Myth." I recommend Thriftbooks, which often sell books at a bit cheaper than other places it can be found. Cowan takes us through all sorts of information that will advance many of our long-held mythology into factual info.
Cheers.
PS: As a long-term researcher I will say this: There is no "C19 bug" FYI. There are no "germs" as we've been taught to think of them. There are three levels of grunge that can sicken us-- so, starting with the least harmful, and in terminology that is strictly for laypeople: There is Firch, which is something you can brush off or wash off; then there's gunk, which might smell quite nasty and CAN make you ill; and lastly, and most disgusting, and should not be taken into the body for any reason, there is Spooge. ;)
I'm not a virologist either. Tons of people who are not virologists now understand the absurdity of virology. Once you understand the basics of what they are and aren't doing, it's very easy for anyone to see that they do not adhere to the scientific method or even a little bit of logic. There is tons of educational material now for lay people. I've collected some of it here: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/what-the-hell-is-going-on/
there you go - I don't know either, I have no science background at all. Is it or is it not that virus? do viruses exist? This is the only person so far I have come across, who posted this pic. You would think if it were real, it would be all over the place, but it is not. And several doctors, nurses, chemists... have asked all over the world for verification, and none got a result. I am stepping away from the virus idea, I feel more confident in the terrain theory. But let us not forget that all of it is theory! we don't know and probably never will.
Where there's a LOT of money involved, the need to keep the Nastiest Lies, including "viruses" and "contagion" floating around like it's actually TRUE and/or "science" becomes a kind of game. In the first year after the "Covid" vaccine came out, the death rate jumped hugely. But in that same year, the vaccine companies, such as Pfizer made record, and vast, profits. I think I read that the US alone saw about 20 NEW billionaires created. I could be wrong about that number, but... For me, just ONE billionaire profiting from vaccines is anathema.
The pic he posted is from a study cited at the bottom of his article, by Caly et al. That study has been featured on my FOI webpage since 2020, highlighted to show how ridiculous virology is. See my comment above about it.
I FOI'd the institution where that study was done (Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity) and they admitted to having to record of the supposed virus actually being found in and purified from any bodily fluid, by anyone, anywhere on the planet:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/australias-doherty-institute-claimed-to-have-isolated-the-covid-19-virus-aka-sars-cov-2-later-said-they-have-no-record-of-such/
The Australian government cited this study in response to an FOI to the Department of Health. They admitted they didn't have what I had asked for and cited this as evidence of "isolation of SARS-CoV-2 in culture“. 'Isolation in culture' is an oxymoron, it is not isolation of anything and does not demonstrate that the particles shown were in the clinical sample to begin with. Plus they never purify the particles even from the cell culture so that they can sequence and characterized them and study them with valid controlled experiments to see if it actually fits the definition of a virus. They just point at tiny particles in the breaking-down monkey/cow/human mixture and declare "that's the virus"!
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/australian-dept-of-health-has-no-record-of-covid-19-virus-isolation/
Here is what Dr. Tom Cowan had to say about this study:
“They said they looked at the results of this culture from the Vero cells, and they found little vesicles and they said they contain coronavirus particles, but the viruses did not look like the normal coronaviruses… in other words they didn’t have the spike protein on them, and then quote ‘It was found that adding trypsin to the cell culture medium immediately improved virion morphology‘ meaning the appearance of the virus, in other words they looked in the cell culture and they didn’t see any particles with the spike protein so they added trypsin which as you probably know is a pancreatic enzyme whose function is to digest proteins, which is what the outer coating of a virus is supposedly made of, so this outer coating of the ‘virus’ was digested by the trypsin which then quote ‘improved the appearance of the ‘virus”. In other words, it was only then that they could see the spike proteins, which immediately would make anybody think that the only reason you could see the spike proteins is because they dissolved the proteins around the coating which would naturally leave little spikey things protruding out from the membrane. When you hear this you can only shake your head and think ‘what the heck, that’s not how people do stuff’. The fact of the matter is there was no spike-protein-looking particle from the culture…. They simply could not find a particle with spike protein, so they cut away some of the edges, leaving naturally spikes protruding from the wall and they said ‘there it is, the spike protein. If that isn’t the wackiest way of thinking I’ve ever seen….”
I already wondered before, how come everyone who asked for it got that response - we do not have the evidence. But there it is. If it were the real thing, would they not jump on it and spread the pictures far and wide?
I have been reading a book from Dr. Cowan and largely agree from what I already knew, with what he states. Only thing - I do not like injections and he seems to be injecting quite a few things (that is just me and needles).
I am not a scientist, but I've read a lot in the past six years, and the conclusion I came to is that vaccines are a fraud and anathema to Nature.
They need to employ A/i to do the searching. Then A/i can invent the answer and all will be well.
LOL Uh huh! ;)